Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations for patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a network meta-analysis and cost-utility analysis.

IF 4.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Youwen Zhu, Kun Liu, Hong Zhu
{"title":"Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations for patients with advanced endometrial cancer: a network meta-analysis and cost-utility analysis.","authors":"Youwen Zhu, Kun Liu, Hong Zhu","doi":"10.1136/ijgc-2024-005296","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations show significant survival advantages compared with chemotherapy for patients with advanced endometrial cancer.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of different immunotherapy combinations for clinician and patient decision-making.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Databases were reviewed from January 1, 2010 to October 30, 2023, for phase III randomized controlled trials of first-line immunotherapy combinations in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival and progression-free survival, relative risks (RRs) of adverse events, and corresponding p value. The lifetime Markov model of cost-effectiveness analysis was developed to summarize the cost, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at the US$150 000/QALY of willingness-to-pay of six first-line treatment strategies.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Four trials were identified, involving 2577 patients. Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy or durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib was associated with more survival benefits than other immunotherapy regimens and chemotherapy in the mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and mismatch repair-proficient microsatellite-stable (pMMR/MSS) population, respectively. Further, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy increased efficacy (cost) by 3.76 QALYs and US$540 817, which yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$143 894/QALY in the dMMR/MSI-H population.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>First-line durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib, and dostarlimab plus chemotherapy, were more beneficial for survival in the pMMR/MSS and dMMR/MSI-H populations, respectively. Only pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was cost-effective for patients with dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer in the USA.</p>","PeriodicalId":14097,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","volume":" ","pages":"1570-1579"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Gynecological Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2024-005296","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations show significant survival advantages compared with chemotherapy for patients with advanced endometrial cancer.

Objective: To compare the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of different immunotherapy combinations for clinician and patient decision-making.

Methods: The PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, and Web of Science Databases were reviewed from January 1, 2010 to October 30, 2023, for phase III randomized controlled trials of first-line immunotherapy combinations in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. Bayesian network meta-analysis was performed to obtain hazard ratios (HRs) of overall survival and progression-free survival, relative risks (RRs) of adverse events, and corresponding p value. The lifetime Markov model of cost-effectiveness analysis was developed to summarize the cost, life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios at the US$150 000/QALY of willingness-to-pay of six first-line treatment strategies.

Results: Four trials were identified, involving 2577 patients. Dostarlimab plus chemotherapy or durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib was associated with more survival benefits than other immunotherapy regimens and chemotherapy in the mismatch repair-deficient microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) and mismatch repair-proficient microsatellite-stable (pMMR/MSS) population, respectively. Further, pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy increased efficacy (cost) by 3.76 QALYs and US$540 817, which yielded incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of US$143 894/QALY in the dMMR/MSI-H population.

Conclusion: First-line durvalumab plus chemotherapy with olaparib, and dostarlimab plus chemotherapy, were more beneficial for survival in the pMMR/MSS and dMMR/MSI-H populations, respectively. Only pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy was cost-effective for patients with dMMR/MSI-H endometrial cancer in the USA.

晚期子宫内膜癌患者的免疫检查点抑制剂组合:网络荟萃分析和成本效用分析。
背景与化疗相比,免疫检查点抑制剂联合疗法对晚期子宫内膜癌患者的生存有显著优势:比较不同免疫疗法组合的疗效、安全性和成本效益,以便临床医生和患者做出决策:方法:对2010年1月1日至2023年10月30日期间PubMed、Embase、Cochrane和Web of Science数据库中关于晚期子宫内膜癌患者一线免疫疗法组合的III期随机对照试验进行了检索。通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析得出了总生存期和无进展生存期的危险比(HRs)、不良事件的相对危险度(RRs)以及相应的P值。建立了终生马尔可夫成本效益分析模型,总结了六种一线治疗策略的成本、生命年、质量调整生命年(QALYs)和增量成本效益比(支付意愿为150 000美元/QALY):结果:共确定了四项试验,涉及 2577 名患者。在错配修复缺陷微卫星不稳定性高(dMMR/MSI-H)和错配修复缺陷微卫星稳定(pMMR/MSS)人群中,多沙利单抗联合化疗或杜伐单抗联合奥拉帕利化疗的生存获益分别高于其他免疫疗法和化疗。此外,在dMMR/MSI-H人群中,pembrolizumab联合化疗与化疗相比,疗效(成本)增加了3.76 QALYs和540 817美元,增量成本效益比为143 894美元/QALY:结论:在pMMR/MSS和dMMR/MSI-H人群中,一线durvalumab+奥拉帕利化疗和dostarlimab+化疗分别更有利于生存。在美国,只有pembrolizumab联合化疗与化疗相比,对dMMR/MSI-H子宫内膜癌患者具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.40%
发文量
280
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, the official journal of the International Gynecologic Cancer Society and the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology, is the primary educational and informational publication for topics relevant to detection, prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of gynecologic malignancies. IJGC emphasizes a multidisciplinary approach, and includes original research, reviews, and video articles. The audience consists of gynecologists, medical oncologists, radiation oncologists, radiologists, pathologists, and research scientists with a special interest in gynecological oncology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信