Ten years of maintenance treatment of severe melancholic depression in an adult woman including discontinuation experiences.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Udo Bonnet
{"title":"Ten years of maintenance treatment of severe melancholic depression in an adult woman including discontinuation experiences.","authors":"Udo Bonnet","doi":"10.1055/a-2332-6107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There are only few publications on long-term treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) lasting 5 years or longer. Most clinical controlled trials lasted no longer than 2 years and some recent studies suggested an advantage of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) over antidepressants in relapse prevention of MDD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Exclusively outpatient \"real world\" treatment of severe melancholia, prospectively documented over 10 years with different serial treatment strategies, discontinuation phenomena and complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Compared to CBT, agomelatine, mirtazapine, bupropion and high-dose milnacipran, high-dose venlafaxine (extended-release form, XR) was effective, even sustainably. Asymptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were found at the beginning of the treatment of the MDD, which initially led to the discontinuation of high-dose venlafaxine (300 mg daily). Even the various treatment strategies mentioned above were unable to compensate for or prevent the subsequent severe deterioration in MDD (2 rebounds, 1 recurrence). Only the renewed use of high-dose venlafaxine was successful. PVC no longer occurred and the treatment was also well tolerated over the years, with venlafaxine serum levels at times exceeding 5 times the recommended upper therapeutic reference level (known bupropion-venlafaxine interaction, otherwise 2.5 to 3-fold increase with high-dose venlafaxine alone). During dose reduction or after gradual discontinuation of high-dose venlafaxine, rather mild withdrawal symptoms occurred, but as described above, also two severe rebounds and one severe recurrence happened.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This long-term observation supports critical reflections on the discontinuation of successful long-term treatment with antidepressants in severe MDD, even if it should be under \"the protection\" of CBT. The PVC seemed to be more related to the duration of the severe major depressive episode than to the venlafaxine treatment itself. A particular prospective observation of this longitudinal case study is that relapses (in the sense of rebounds) during or after previous venlafaxine tapering seemed to herald the recurrence after complete recovery. Remarkably, neither relapses nor recurrence could be prevented by CBT.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In this case, high-dose venlafaxine has a particular relapse-preventive (and \"recurrence-preventive\") effect with good long-term tolerability.</p>","PeriodicalId":12353,"journal":{"name":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fortschritte Der Neurologie Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2332-6107","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There are only few publications on long-term treatments for major depressive disorder (MDD) lasting 5 years or longer. Most clinical controlled trials lasted no longer than 2 years and some recent studies suggested an advantage of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) over antidepressants in relapse prevention of MDD.

Methods: Exclusively outpatient "real world" treatment of severe melancholia, prospectively documented over 10 years with different serial treatment strategies, discontinuation phenomena and complications.

Methods: Compared to CBT, agomelatine, mirtazapine, bupropion and high-dose milnacipran, high-dose venlafaxine (extended-release form, XR) was effective, even sustainably. Asymptomatic premature ventricular contractions (PVCs) were found at the beginning of the treatment of the MDD, which initially led to the discontinuation of high-dose venlafaxine (300 mg daily). Even the various treatment strategies mentioned above were unable to compensate for or prevent the subsequent severe deterioration in MDD (2 rebounds, 1 recurrence). Only the renewed use of high-dose venlafaxine was successful. PVC no longer occurred and the treatment was also well tolerated over the years, with venlafaxine serum levels at times exceeding 5 times the recommended upper therapeutic reference level (known bupropion-venlafaxine interaction, otherwise 2.5 to 3-fold increase with high-dose venlafaxine alone). During dose reduction or after gradual discontinuation of high-dose venlafaxine, rather mild withdrawal symptoms occurred, but as described above, also two severe rebounds and one severe recurrence happened.

Discussion: This long-term observation supports critical reflections on the discontinuation of successful long-term treatment with antidepressants in severe MDD, even if it should be under "the protection" of CBT. The PVC seemed to be more related to the duration of the severe major depressive episode than to the venlafaxine treatment itself. A particular prospective observation of this longitudinal case study is that relapses (in the sense of rebounds) during or after previous venlafaxine tapering seemed to herald the recurrence after complete recovery. Remarkably, neither relapses nor recurrence could be prevented by CBT.

Conclusion: In this case, high-dose venlafaxine has a particular relapse-preventive (and "recurrence-preventive") effect with good long-term tolerability.

对一名成年女性的严重忧郁抑郁症进行了长达十年的维持治疗,包括中断治疗的经历。
背景:关于重度抑郁障碍(MDD)5年或5年以上长期治疗的文献寥寥无几。大多数临床对照试验持续时间不超过2年,最近的一些研究表明,在预防重度抑郁症复发方面,认知行为疗法(CBT)比抗抑郁药物更有优势:方法:完全在门诊 "真实世界 "治疗重度忧郁症,前瞻性记录10年来的不同系列治疗策略、停药现象和并发症:与 CBT、阿戈美拉汀、米氮平、安非他酮和大剂量米那西普相比,大剂量文拉法辛(缓释型,XR)有效,甚至可持续。在开始治疗 MDD 时,发现了无症状的室性早搏(PVC),这导致了大剂量文拉法辛(每天 300 毫克)的停药。即便是上述各种治疗策略,也无法弥补或防止随后 MDD 的严重恶化(2 次反弹,1 次复发)。只有重新使用大剂量文拉法辛取得了成功。多年来,PVC 不再发生,治疗的耐受性也很好,文拉法辛的血清浓度有时超过推荐治疗参考上限的 5 倍(已知安非他酮与文拉法辛之间存在相互作用,否则单独使用大剂量文拉法辛会增加 2.5 至 3 倍)。在减量或逐渐停用大剂量文拉法辛期间,出现了相当轻微的戒断症状,但如上所述,也出现了两次严重反弹和一次严重复发:讨论:这一长期观察结果支持了对严重 MDD 患者停止长期成功的抗抑郁药物治疗的批判性思考,即使这种治疗是在 CBT 的 "保护 "下进行的。PVC似乎与严重重度抑郁发作的持续时间有关,而不是与文拉法辛治疗本身有关。这项纵向病例研究的一个特别的前瞻性观察结果是,在之前文拉法辛减量期间或之后的复发(反弹)似乎预示着完全康复后的复发。值得注意的是,无论是复发还是复发,CBT 都无法预防:在这种情况下,大剂量文拉法辛具有特殊的预防复发(和 "预防复发")效果,而且长期耐受性良好。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
139
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Fundiertes Wissen für den Berufsalltag Relevante Originalarbeiten Informative Übersichten zu wichtigen Themen Fortbildungsteil mit Zertifizierung – 36 CME-Punkte pro Jahr Interessante Kasuistiken Referiert & kommentiert: Internationale Studien Aktuelles zu Begutachtung und Neurobiologie International gelistet und häufig zitiert
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信