Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing a patient-led escalation system: a qualitative study.

IF 5.6 1区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Elizabeth Sutton, Mudathir Ibrahim, William Plath, Lesley Booth, Mark Sujan, Peter McCulloch, Nicola Mackintosh
{"title":"Understanding the enablers and barriers to implementing a patient-led escalation system: a qualitative study.","authors":"Elizabeth Sutton, Mudathir Ibrahim, William Plath, Lesley Booth, Mark Sujan, Peter McCulloch, Nicola Mackintosh","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The management of acute deterioration following surgery remains highly variable. Patients and families can play an important role in identifying early signs of deterioration but effective contribution to escalation of care can be practically difficult to achieve. This paper reports the enablers and barriers to the implementation of patient-led escalation systems found during a process evaluation of a quality improvement programme Rescue for Emergency Surgery Patients Observed to uNdergo acute Deterioration (RESPOND).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The research used ethnographic methods, including over 100 hours of observations on surgical units in three English hospitals in order to understand the everyday context of care. Observations focused on the coordination of activities such as handovers and how rescue featured as part of this. We also conducted 27 interviews with a range of clinical and managerial staff and patients. We employed a thematic analysis approach, combined with a theoretically focused implementation coding framework, based on Normalisation Process Theory.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We found that organisational infrastructural support in the form of a leadership support and clinical care outreach teams with capacity were enablers in implementing the patient-led escalation system. Barriers to implementation included making changes to professional practice without discussing the value and legitimacy of operationalising patient concerns, and ensuring equity of use. We found that organisational work is needed to overcome patient fears about disrupting social and cultural norms.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This paper reveals the need for infrastructural support to facilitate the implementation of a patient-led escalation system, and leadership support to normalise the everyday process of involving patients and families in escalation. This type of system may not achieve its goals without properly understanding and addressing the concerns of both nurses and patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":9077,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Quality & Safety","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Quality & Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2024-017132","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The management of acute deterioration following surgery remains highly variable. Patients and families can play an important role in identifying early signs of deterioration but effective contribution to escalation of care can be practically difficult to achieve. This paper reports the enablers and barriers to the implementation of patient-led escalation systems found during a process evaluation of a quality improvement programme Rescue for Emergency Surgery Patients Observed to uNdergo acute Deterioration (RESPOND).

Methods: The research used ethnographic methods, including over 100 hours of observations on surgical units in three English hospitals in order to understand the everyday context of care. Observations focused on the coordination of activities such as handovers and how rescue featured as part of this. We also conducted 27 interviews with a range of clinical and managerial staff and patients. We employed a thematic analysis approach, combined with a theoretically focused implementation coding framework, based on Normalisation Process Theory.

Results: We found that organisational infrastructural support in the form of a leadership support and clinical care outreach teams with capacity were enablers in implementing the patient-led escalation system. Barriers to implementation included making changes to professional practice without discussing the value and legitimacy of operationalising patient concerns, and ensuring equity of use. We found that organisational work is needed to overcome patient fears about disrupting social and cultural norms.

Conclusions: This paper reveals the need for infrastructural support to facilitate the implementation of a patient-led escalation system, and leadership support to normalise the everyday process of involving patients and families in escalation. This type of system may not achieve its goals without properly understanding and addressing the concerns of both nurses and patients.

了解实施患者主导的升级系统的有利因素和障碍:一项定性研究。
背景:手术后急性病情恶化的处理方法仍然千差万别。患者和家属在识别病情恶化的早期迹象方面可以发挥重要作用,但实际上很难有效促进护理升级。本文报告了在对 "急诊手术患者急性病情恶化观察救援"(RESPOND)质量改进项目进行过程评估时发现的实施患者主导的病情升级系统的有利因素和障碍:研究采用人种学方法,包括在三家英国医院的外科病房进行 100 多个小时的观察,以了解日常护理环境。观察的重点是交接班等活动的协调以及抢救如何成为其中的一部分。我们还对一系列临床和管理人员以及患者进行了 27 次访谈。我们采用了主题分析方法,并结合以规范化过程理论为基础的、以理论为重点的实施编码框架:我们发现,以领导支持和临床护理外联团队能力为形式的组织基础设施支持是实施患者主导的升级系统的促进因素。实施过程中遇到的障碍包括:在未讨论将患者关注的问题付诸实施的价值和合法性的情况下改变专业实践,以及确保使用的公平性。我们发现,需要开展组织工作,克服患者对破坏社会和文化规范的恐惧:本文揭示了需要基础设施支持来促进患者主导的上报系统的实施,以及领导支持来使患者和家属参与上报的日常过程正常化。如果不能正确理解并解决护士和患者的关切,这类系统可能无法实现其目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMJ Quality & Safety
BMJ Quality & Safety HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
7.40%
发文量
104
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Quality & Safety (previously Quality & Safety in Health Care) is an international peer review publication providing research, opinions, debates and reviews for academics, clinicians and healthcare managers focused on the quality and safety of health care and the science of improvement. The journal receives approximately 1000 manuscripts a year and has an acceptance rate for original research of 12%. Time from submission to first decision averages 22 days and accepted articles are typically published online within 20 days. Its current impact factor is 3.281.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信