Blood group is a long-term cardiovascular risk factor after carotid endarterectomy.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
Filipa Jácome, Mariana Basílio Martins, Alexandre Sarmento, Andreia Coelho, Marina Dias-Neto, Ahmed Khairy, Eduardo Ocke-Reis, José Andrade, João Rocha-Neves
{"title":"Blood group is a long-term cardiovascular risk factor after carotid endarterectomy.","authors":"Filipa Jácome, Mariana Basílio Martins, Alexandre Sarmento, Andreia Coelho, Marina Dias-Neto, Ahmed Khairy, Eduardo Ocke-Reis, José Andrade, João Rocha-Neves","doi":"10.1080/00015458.2024.2371697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>ABO blood group system has been clinically related to an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Preliminary data relating Rhesus (Rh) factor and these outcomes also have been published. Our aim was to analyse the impact of blood group on the short and long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>From 2012 to 2019, patients from a referral centre who underwent CEA for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis were prospectively followed. Our primary outcomes were long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 21-69). Time-to-event analysis was used to determine the effect of ABO and Rh groups in long-term outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and eighty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.1 years. Eighteen (25.7%) patients with O type and 48 (42.1%) patients with non-O type presented coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.313, 5-95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.297, <i>p</i> = .008). Patients Rh<sup>+</sup> presented significantly more congestive heart failure, 23 (14.7%), <i>p</i> = .03. The incidence of MACE in the long-term was higher in non-O patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.034; CI: 1.032-4.010, <i>p</i> = .040). Rh<sup>-</sup> patients, presented a higher incidence of perioperative MINS. However, there was no statistically significant association with long-term risk of MACE.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The incidence of MACE in long-term analysis was higher in non-O blood type and 30-day MINS was significantly more common amongst Rh<sup>-</sup> patients. The benefit from a more complete preoperative cardiac study in these patients should be performed.</p>","PeriodicalId":6935,"journal":{"name":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Chirurgica Belgica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00015458.2024.2371697","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: ABO blood group system has been clinically related to an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Preliminary data relating Rhesus (Rh) factor and these outcomes also have been published. Our aim was to analyse the impact of blood group on the short and long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA).

Materials and methods: From 2012 to 2019, patients from a referral centre who underwent CEA for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis were prospectively followed. Our primary outcomes were long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 21-69). Time-to-event analysis was used to determine the effect of ABO and Rh groups in long-term outcomes.

Results: One hundred and eighty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.1 years. Eighteen (25.7%) patients with O type and 48 (42.1%) patients with non-O type presented coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.313, 5-95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.297, p = .008). Patients Rh+ presented significantly more congestive heart failure, 23 (14.7%), p = .03. The incidence of MACE in the long-term was higher in non-O patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.034; CI: 1.032-4.010, p = .040). Rh- patients, presented a higher incidence of perioperative MINS. However, there was no statistically significant association with long-term risk of MACE.

Conclusion: The incidence of MACE in long-term analysis was higher in non-O blood type and 30-day MINS was significantly more common amongst Rh- patients. The benefit from a more complete preoperative cardiac study in these patients should be performed.

血型是颈动脉内膜切除术后心血管疾病的长期风险因素。
背景:ABO 血型系统在临床上与心血管疾病发病率的增加有关。有关恒河猴(Rh)因子和这些结果的初步数据也已公布。我们的目的是分析血型对颈动脉内膜剥脱术(CEA)后短期和长期预后的影响:从 2012 年到 2019 年,我们对一家转诊中心因动脉粥样硬化性颈动脉狭窄而接受 CEA 的患者进行了前瞻性随访。我们的主要结果是长期主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和全因死亡率。次要结果是围手术期并发症和非心脏手术后心肌损伤(MINS)。中位随访时间为 50 个月(四分位数间距为 21-69 个月)。采用时间到事件分析法确定ABO和Rh血型对长期结果的影响:共纳入 184 名患者,平均年龄为 70.1 ± 9.1 岁。18名(25.7%)O型患者和48名(42.1%)非O型患者出现冠状动脉疾病(几率比[OR]:2.313 5-95% 置信区间[CI]1.245-4.297,P = 0.008)。Rh+患者出现充血性心力衰竭的比例明显更高,为23例(14.7%),P= 0.03。非O型患者的长期MACE发生率更高(调整后危险比:2.034;CI:1.032-4.010,P= 0.040)。Rh-患者围手术期MINS发生率较高。然而,长期MACE风险与之并无统计学意义:结论:在长期分析中,非 O 型血患者的 MACE 发生率较高,Rh- 患者的 30 天 MINS 发生率明显更高。应该对这些患者进行更全面的术前心脏检查,以便从中获益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Acta Chirurgica Belgica
Acta Chirurgica Belgica 医学-外科
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
82
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Chirurgica Belgica (ACB) is the official journal of the Royal Belgian Society for Surgery (RBSS) and its affiliated societies. It publishes Editorials, Review papers, Original Research, and Technique related manuscripts in the broad field of Clinical Surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信