Burnout Prevalence and Associated Factors Among Palliative and Hospice Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Endemic: An Exploratory Survey.

Wan Ru Ng, Nur Hamizah, Xiangyi Chen, Zhi Zheng Yeo, Keng Chuan Soh, Poh Heng Chong
{"title":"Burnout Prevalence and Associated Factors Among Palliative and Hospice Care Professionals During the COVID-19 Endemic: An Exploratory Survey.","authors":"Wan Ru Ng, Nur Hamizah, Xiangyi Chen, Zhi Zheng Yeo, Keng Chuan Soh, Poh Heng Chong","doi":"10.1177/10499091241257958","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Burnout is a significant issue for palliative and hospice professionals, exacerbated by the impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare professionals. It is crucial to update our understanding of prevalence data, identify associated factors, and evaluate support resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We aimed to explore the prevalence of burnout among palliative and hospice care workers, 2 years into the COVID-19 pandemic by using the Maslach's Burnout Inventory; anxiety, using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), workload, risk perception of COVID-19, confidence in protective measures (personal, workplace, and government), and usage and perceived helpfulness of support resources. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyse burnout against these factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 115 respondents encompassing doctors, nurses and social workers (76.5% female; average age 40.9), 48.7% experienced burnout. Burnout correlated with increased anxiety, higher COVID-19 risk perception, heavier workload, and reduced confidence in protective measures. Peer support, COVID information, and psychological programs were rated as the most effective for coping.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The study indicates considerable levels of burnout among palliative and hospice care workers, linked to workload, anxiety, and perceived risk. Traditional mental health interventions had limited efficacy; respondents favoured peer support and organisational changes. The findings stress the need for a holistic approach, including diverse resources, workload management, and regular mental health assessments.</p>","PeriodicalId":94222,"journal":{"name":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","volume":" ","pages":"365-371"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The American journal of hospice & palliative care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10499091241257958","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Burnout is a significant issue for palliative and hospice professionals, exacerbated by the impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on healthcare professionals. It is crucial to update our understanding of prevalence data, identify associated factors, and evaluate support resources during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods: We aimed to explore the prevalence of burnout among palliative and hospice care workers, 2 years into the COVID-19 pandemic by using the Maslach's Burnout Inventory; anxiety, using General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), workload, risk perception of COVID-19, confidence in protective measures (personal, workplace, and government), and usage and perceived helpfulness of support resources. Univariate logistic regression analysis was conducted to analyse burnout against these factors.

Results: Of the 115 respondents encompassing doctors, nurses and social workers (76.5% female; average age 40.9), 48.7% experienced burnout. Burnout correlated with increased anxiety, higher COVID-19 risk perception, heavier workload, and reduced confidence in protective measures. Peer support, COVID information, and psychological programs were rated as the most effective for coping.

Conclusion: The study indicates considerable levels of burnout among palliative and hospice care workers, linked to workload, anxiety, and perceived risk. Traditional mental health interventions had limited efficacy; respondents favoured peer support and organisational changes. The findings stress the need for a holistic approach, including diverse resources, workload management, and regular mental health assessments.

COVID-19 流行期间姑息治疗和安宁疗护专业人员的职业倦怠发生率及相关因素:一项探索性调查。
背景:职业倦怠是姑息治疗和临终关怀专业人员面临的一个重要问题,而冠状病毒病 2019(COVID-19)对医护人员的影响加剧了这一问题。在 COVID-19 大流行期间,更新我们对流行率数据的了解、确定相关因素并评估支持资源至关重要:我们的目的是在 COVID-19 流行两年后,使用马斯拉赫职业倦怠量表(Maslach's Burnout Inventory)探究姑息治疗和安宁疗护工作者的职业倦怠发生率;使用一般焦虑症-7(GAD-7)量表探究焦虑发生率、工作量、对 COVID-19 的风险感知、对保护措施(个人、工作场所和政府)的信心以及对支持资源的使用和感知有用性。对这些因素进行了单变量逻辑回归分析,以分析职业倦怠:在包括医生、护士和社工(76.5% 为女性,平均年龄为 40.9 岁)在内的 115 名受访者中,48.7% 的人有职业倦怠经历。职业倦怠与焦虑增加、COVID-19 风险感知增加、工作量增加以及对保护措施的信心降低相关。同伴支持、COVID 信息和心理计划被评为最有效的应对措施:研究表明,姑息关怀和临终关怀工作者的职业倦怠程度相当高,与工作量、焦虑和风险感知有关。传统的心理健康干预措施效果有限;受访者更倾向于同伴支持和组织变革。研究结果强调,需要采取综合方法,包括多样化的资源、工作量管理和定期心理健康评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信