Associations of smart device apps with and without a perceived self-efficacy component in a physical activity context with BMI.

IF 2.5 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL
Journal of Health Psychology Pub Date : 2025-05-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1177/13591053241258254
Alexander Karl Ferdinand Loder, Mireille Nicoline Maria van Poppel
{"title":"Associations of smart device apps with and without a perceived self-efficacy component in a physical activity context with BMI.","authors":"Alexander Karl Ferdinand Loder, Mireille Nicoline Maria van Poppel","doi":"10.1177/13591053241258254","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Smart device apps can be used to promote physical activity, decrease sedentariness, or increase self-efficacy to get active in college students, possibly reducing their obesity risk. This study assessed associations of college students' smart device use with body mass index (BMI), expecting associations between physical activity parameters and self-efficacy with BMI, moderated by app type. In an online survey, app data of a week from student's devices, weight, height, physical activity, and self-efficacy to get active were collected from 120 students. Apps were categorized \"physical activity,\" \"physical activity with a self-efficacy component,\" or \"unrelated.\" Use time of physical activity apps is not associated with BMI, while self-efficacy app time show negative and unrelated app time positive associations. Self-efficacy may be an important component in app design for obesity risk reduction of college students. Test economy was low, which is why future studies need to concentrate on better data extraction methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":51355,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Health Psychology","volume":" ","pages":"1334-1348"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12053270/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Health Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13591053241258254","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Smart device apps can be used to promote physical activity, decrease sedentariness, or increase self-efficacy to get active in college students, possibly reducing their obesity risk. This study assessed associations of college students' smart device use with body mass index (BMI), expecting associations between physical activity parameters and self-efficacy with BMI, moderated by app type. In an online survey, app data of a week from student's devices, weight, height, physical activity, and self-efficacy to get active were collected from 120 students. Apps were categorized "physical activity," "physical activity with a self-efficacy component," or "unrelated." Use time of physical activity apps is not associated with BMI, while self-efficacy app time show negative and unrelated app time positive associations. Self-efficacy may be an important component in app design for obesity risk reduction of college students. Test economy was low, which is why future studies need to concentrate on better data extraction methods.

在体育锻炼背景下,含有和不含有感知自我效能成分的智能设备应用程序与体重指数的关系。
智能设备应用程序可用于促进大学生的体育锻炼、减少久坐或提高自我活动能力,从而降低其肥胖风险。本研究评估了大学生使用智能设备与体重指数(BMI)之间的关联,预计体育锻炼参数和自我效能与BMI之间的关联会受到应用程序类型的调节。在一项在线调查中,我们收集了 120 名学生一周内使用智能设备的应用程序数据、体重、身高、体力活动和运动自我效能。应用程序被归类为 "体育活动"、"有自我效能感的体育活动 "或 "无关"。体育锻炼应用程序的使用时间与体重指数无关,而自我效能应用程序的使用时间与体重指数呈负相关,与无关应用程序的使用时间呈正相关。自我效能可能是设计减少大学生肥胖风险的应用程序的重要组成部分。测试的经济性较低,这也是为什么未来的研究需要专注于更好的数据提取方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Health Psychology
Journal of Health Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
3.10%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: ournal of Health Psychology is an international peer-reviewed journal that aims to support and help shape research in health psychology from around the world. It provides a platform for traditional empirical analyses as well as more qualitative and/or critically oriented approaches. It also addresses the social contexts in which psychological and health processes are embedded. Studies published in this journal are required to obtain ethical approval from an Institutional Review Board. Such approval must include informed, signed consent by all research participants. Any manuscript not containing an explicit statement concerning ethical approval and informed consent will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信