Emotions in search of words: Does alexithymia predict treatment outcome in chronic musculoskeletal pain?

IF 3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Stress and Health Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-19 DOI:10.1002/smi.3436
Roberta Lanzara, Chiara Conti, Vittorio Lalli, Paolo Cannizzaro, Gianna Pia Affaitati, Maria Adele Giamberardino, Alison Williams, Piero Porcelli
{"title":"Emotions in search of words: Does alexithymia predict treatment outcome in chronic musculoskeletal pain?","authors":"Roberta Lanzara, Chiara Conti, Vittorio Lalli, Paolo Cannizzaro, Gianna Pia Affaitati, Maria Adele Giamberardino, Alison Williams, Piero Porcelli","doi":"10.1002/smi.3436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Chronic pain, with its complex and multidimensional nature, poses significant challenges in identifying effective long-term treatments. There is growing scientific interest in how psychopathological and personality dimensions may influence the maintenance and development of chronic pain. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate whether alexithymia can predict the improvement of pain severity following a treatment-as-usual programme for chronic musculoskeletal pain over and above psychological cofactors (emotional distress, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy). A consecutive sample of 129 patients with diagnosed chronic musculoskeletal pain referred to two tertiary care centres was recruited and treated for 16 weeks. Clinical pain, psychological distress, self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and alexithymia were assessed with validated self-report measures at the first medical visit (T0) and at 16-week follow-up (T1). Compared with non-responder patients (n = 72, 55.8%), those who responded (i.e., reduction of >30% in pain severity; n = 57, 44.2%) reported an overall improvement in psychological variables except alexithymia. Alexithymia showed relative stability between baseline and follow-up within the entire sample and remained a significant predictor of treatment outcome even when other predictive cofactors (i.e., pain interference, depressive symptoms, and catastrophizing) were considered simultaneously. Our results suggest that identifying patients with a co-occurrence between alexithymia, depressive symptoms, catastrophizing, and the stressful experience of chronic pain can be clinically relevant in pain prevention and intervention programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":51175,"journal":{"name":"Stress and Health","volume":" ","pages":"e3436"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stress and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.3436","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/19 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Chronic pain, with its complex and multidimensional nature, poses significant challenges in identifying effective long-term treatments. There is growing scientific interest in how psychopathological and personality dimensions may influence the maintenance and development of chronic pain. This longitudinal study aimed to investigate whether alexithymia can predict the improvement of pain severity following a treatment-as-usual programme for chronic musculoskeletal pain over and above psychological cofactors (emotional distress, catastrophizing, and self-efficacy). A consecutive sample of 129 patients with diagnosed chronic musculoskeletal pain referred to two tertiary care centres was recruited and treated for 16 weeks. Clinical pain, psychological distress, self-efficacy, catastrophizing, and alexithymia were assessed with validated self-report measures at the first medical visit (T0) and at 16-week follow-up (T1). Compared with non-responder patients (n = 72, 55.8%), those who responded (i.e., reduction of >30% in pain severity; n = 57, 44.2%) reported an overall improvement in psychological variables except alexithymia. Alexithymia showed relative stability between baseline and follow-up within the entire sample and remained a significant predictor of treatment outcome even when other predictive cofactors (i.e., pain interference, depressive symptoms, and catastrophizing) were considered simultaneously. Our results suggest that identifying patients with a co-occurrence between alexithymia, depressive symptoms, catastrophizing, and the stressful experience of chronic pain can be clinically relevant in pain prevention and intervention programs.

寻找词语的情感:情感障碍能否预测慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛的治疗效果?
慢性疼痛具有复杂性和多面性,给确定有效的长期治疗方法带来了巨大挑战。科学界对心理病理学和人格维度如何影响慢性疼痛的维持和发展越来越感兴趣。这项纵向研究旨在探讨,在对慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛进行 "照常治疗 "后,除了心理辅助因素(情绪困扰、灾难化和自我效能感)外,情感障碍是否还能预测疼痛严重程度的改善。研究人员连续抽取了 129 名转诊至两家三级医疗中心的确诊慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛患者,对其进行了为期 16 周的治疗。在首次就诊(T0)和 16 周随访(T1)时,采用经过验证的自我报告方法对临床疼痛、心理困扰、自我效能感、灾难化和自闭症进行了评估。与无反应的患者(72 人,55.8%)相比,有反应的患者(即疼痛严重程度减轻大于 30%;57 人,44.2%)报告称,除自闭症外,其他心理变量均有整体改善。在整个样本中,自闭症在基线和随访期间表现出相对稳定性,即使同时考虑其他预测性辅助因素(即疼痛干扰、抑郁症状和灾难化),自闭症仍是治疗结果的重要预测因素。我们的研究结果表明,在疼痛预防和干预项目中,识别同时存在情感淡漠、抑郁症状、灾难化和慢性疼痛压力体验的患者具有临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Stress and Health
Stress and Health 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.90%
发文量
91
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Stress is a normal component of life and a number of mechanisms exist to cope with its effects. The stresses that challenge man"s existence in our modern society may result in failure of these coping mechanisms, with resultant stress-induced illness. The aim of the journal therefore is to provide a forum for discussion of all aspects of stress which affect the individual in both health and disease. The Journal explores the subject from as many aspects as possible, so that when stress becomes a consideration, health information can be presented as to the best ways by which to minimise its effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信