Diet quality, Self-efficacy and Health Literacy in Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q2 NUTRITION & DIETETICS
Erynn A McAuley, Lynda A Ross, Mary T Hannan-Jones, Helen L MacLaughlin
{"title":"Diet quality, Self-efficacy and Health Literacy in Adults with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cross-Sectional Study.","authors":"Erynn A McAuley, Lynda A Ross, Mary T Hannan-Jones, Helen L MacLaughlin","doi":"10.1053/j.jrn.2024.06.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Adherence to high quality dietary patterns is associated with lower risk of disease progression and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Self-efficacy and health literacy are recognised as factors that may lead to better adherence to high quality diets. However, these associations are not well studied in CKD. This study aims to explore the relationship between health literacy, self-efficacy, and diet quality in CKD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants with CKD stages 3a-5 recruited from three large tertiary hospitals were assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item scale (SEMCD-6), the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and the Australian Eating Survey (AES) Food Frequency Questionnaire. Diet quality was measured using the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). Associations were examined using multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for sex and type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty participants were included in the analysis. Mean age of participants was 74.5 years old and 58% were male. The mean ARFS was poor (Mean=29.9±9.1/73) and characterised by high intake of processed foods and animal protein, and low intake of fruit and vegetables. Mean SEMCD-6 was high (7.12±2.07/10). Self-efficacy and health literacy domains 6 - Actively engage with healthcare providers and 7 - Navigating healthcare system independently predicted diet quality in the adjusted model for sex and T2D.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Adults with CKD report suboptimal diet quality. The results suggest that self-efficacy and aspects of health literacy should be considered when designing interventions aimed at improving diet quality in people with CKD.</p>","PeriodicalId":50066,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Renal Nutrition","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jrn.2024.06.005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NUTRITION & DIETETICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Adherence to high quality dietary patterns is associated with lower risk of disease progression and all-cause mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD). Self-efficacy and health literacy are recognised as factors that may lead to better adherence to high quality diets. However, these associations are not well studied in CKD. This study aims to explore the relationship between health literacy, self-efficacy, and diet quality in CKD.

Methods: Participants with CKD stages 3a-5 recruited from three large tertiary hospitals were assessed using the Self-Efficacy for Managing Chronic Disease 6-item scale (SEMCD-6), the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) and the Australian Eating Survey (AES) Food Frequency Questionnaire. Diet quality was measured using the Australian Recommended Food Score (ARFS). Associations were examined using multivariable linear regression models, adjusted for sex and type 2 diabetes (T2D) diagnosis.

Results: Sixty participants were included in the analysis. Mean age of participants was 74.5 years old and 58% were male. The mean ARFS was poor (Mean=29.9±9.1/73) and characterised by high intake of processed foods and animal protein, and low intake of fruit and vegetables. Mean SEMCD-6 was high (7.12±2.07/10). Self-efficacy and health literacy domains 6 - Actively engage with healthcare providers and 7 - Navigating healthcare system independently predicted diet quality in the adjusted model for sex and T2D.

Conclusion: Adults with CKD report suboptimal diet quality. The results suggest that self-efficacy and aspects of health literacy should be considered when designing interventions aimed at improving diet quality in people with CKD.

慢性肾病成人的饮食质量、自我效能感和健康素养:一项横断面研究。
目的:坚持优质饮食模式与降低慢性肾脏病(CKD)的疾病进展风险和全因死亡率有关。自我效能感和健康素养被认为是可能导致更好地坚持优质饮食的因素。然而,这些关联在 CKD 中并没有得到很好的研究。本研究旨在探讨 CKD 患者的健康素养、自我效能感和饮食质量之间的关系:从三家大型三甲医院招募的 CKD 3a-5 期患者使用管理慢性疾病自我效能 6 项量表 (SEMCD-6)、健康素养问卷 (HLQ) 和澳大利亚饮食调查 (AES) 食物频率问卷进行评估。饮食质量采用澳大利亚推荐食物评分(ARFS)进行测量。采用多变量线性回归模型对相关性进行了研究,并对性别和2型糖尿病(T2D)诊断进行了调整:60名参与者参与了分析。参与者的平均年龄为 74.5 岁,58% 为男性。平均ARFS较差(Mean=29.9±9.1/73),特点是加工食品和动物蛋白摄入量高,水果和蔬菜摄入量低。SEMCD-6平均值较高(7.12±2.07/10)。在性别和 T2D 调整模型中,自我效能和健康素养领域 6 - 积极与医疗保健提供者接触和 7 - 医疗保健系统导航可独立预测饮食质量:结论:患有慢性肾脏病的成年人的饮食质量欠佳。结果表明,在设计旨在改善慢性肾脏病患者饮食质量的干预措施时,应考虑自我效能和健康素养的各个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Renal Nutrition
Journal of Renal Nutrition 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.50%
发文量
146
审稿时长
6.7 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Renal Nutrition is devoted exclusively to renal nutrition science and renal dietetics. Its content is appropriate for nutritionists, physicians and researchers working in nephrology. Each issue contains a state-of-the-art review, original research, articles on the clinical management and education of patients, a current literature review, and nutritional analysis of food products that have clinical relevance.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信