First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARKTM BMXTM 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Ahmed Abdelsalam, Hayes B Fountain, Ian A Ramsay, Evan M Luther, Mohammad Mahdi Sowlat, Michael A Silva, Ameer E Hassan, Aman B Patel, Tiffany Eatz, Pradeep Joseph, Robert W Regenhardt, Sudhakar R Satti, Adnan H Siddiqui, Sai Sanikommu, Ammad A Baig, Priyank Khandelwal, Alejandro M Spiotta, Robert M Starke
{"title":"First multicenter study evaluating the utility of the BENCHMARK<sup>TM</sup> BMX<sup>TM</sup> 81 large-bore access catheter in neurovascular interventions.","authors":"Ahmed Abdelsalam, Hayes B Fountain, Ian A Ramsay, Evan M Luther, Mohammad Mahdi Sowlat, Michael A Silva, Ameer E Hassan, Aman B Patel, Tiffany Eatz, Pradeep Joseph, Robert W Regenhardt, Sudhakar R Satti, Adnan H Siddiqui, Sai Sanikommu, Ammad A Baig, Priyank Khandelwal, Alejandro M Spiotta, Robert M Starke","doi":"10.1177/15910199241262848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian artery and target vessel (1/90, 1.1%). Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of the cases (89/90), with six cases requiring a switch from radial to femoral (6.7%) and one case from femoral to radial (1.1%). There were no access site complications or complications related to the 0.081″ catheter. Two postprocedural complications occurred (2.2%), unrelated to the access catheter.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The BMX™ 81 large-bore access catheters was safe and effective in both radial and femoral access across a wide range of neurovascular procedures, achieving high technical success without any access site or device-related complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":49174,"journal":{"name":"Interventional Neuroradiology","volume":" ","pages":"15910199241262848"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571168/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interventional Neuroradiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15910199241262848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: This study is the first multicentric report on the safety, efficacy, and technical performance of utilizing a large bore (0.081″ inner diameter) access catheter in neurovascular interventions.

Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from seven sites in the United States for neurovascular procedures via large bore 0.081″ inner diameter access catheter (Benchmark BMX81, Penumbra, Inc.). The primary outcome was technical success, defined as the access catheter reaching its target vessel. Safety outcomes included periprocedural device-related and access site complications.

Results: There were 90 consecutive patients included. The median age of the patients was 63 years (IQR: 53, 68); 53% were female. The most common interventions were aneurysm embolization (33.3%), carotid stenting (12.2%), and arteriovenous malformation embolization (11.1%). The transradial approach was most used (56.7%), followed by transfemoral (41.1%). Challenging anatomic variations included severe vessel tortuosity (8/90, 8.9%), type 2 aortic arch (7/90, 7.8%), type 3 aortic arch (2/90, 2.2%), bovine arch (2/90, 2.2%), and severe angle (<30°) between the subclavian artery and target vessel (1/90, 1.1%). Technical success was achieved in 98.9% of the cases (89/90), with six cases requiring a switch from radial to femoral (6.7%) and one case from femoral to radial (1.1%). There were no access site complications or complications related to the 0.081″ catheter. Two postprocedural complications occurred (2.2%), unrelated to the access catheter.

Conclusion: The BMX™ 81 large-bore access catheters was safe and effective in both radial and femoral access across a wide range of neurovascular procedures, achieving high technical success without any access site or device-related complications.

首项多中心研究评估了 BENCHMARKTM BMXTM 81 大口径入路导管在神经血管介入中的实用性。
简介:这是第一份关于神经血管介入手术中使用大口径(0.081 英寸内径)入路导管的安全性、有效性和技术性能的多中心研究报告:本研究是第一份关于神经血管介入手术中使用大口径(内径 0.081 英寸)入路导管的安全性、有效性和技术性能的多中心报告:回顾性收集了美国 7 家医院通过内径为 0.081 英寸的大口径入路导管(Benchmark BMX81,Penumbra 公司)进行神经血管手术的数据。主要结果是技术成功,即通路导管到达目标血管。安全性结果包括围手术期器械相关并发症和入路部位并发症:结果:共纳入 90 名连续患者。患者的中位年龄为 63 岁(IQR:53, 68);53% 为女性。最常见的介入疗法是动脉瘤栓塞术(33.3%)、颈动脉支架植入术(12.2%)和动静脉畸形栓塞术(11.1%)。经桡动脉途径使用最多(56.7%),其次是经口途径(41.1%)。具有挑战性的解剖变异包括严重的血管迂曲(8/90,8.9%)、2型主动脉弓(7/90,7.8%)、3型主动脉弓(2/90,2.2%)、牛弓(2/90,2.2%)和严重的夹角(结论:BMX™81大口径主动脉瓣置换术是一种新的手术方法,它能在最短的时间内完成手术:BMX™ 81 大口径入路导管在各种神经血管手术的桡动脉和股动脉入路中均安全有效,技术成功率高,未出现任何入路部位或器械相关并发症。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Interventional Neuroradiology
Interventional Neuroradiology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
11.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Interventional Neuroradiology (INR) is a peer-reviewed clinical practice journal documenting the current state of interventional neuroradiology worldwide. INR publishes original clinical observations, descriptions of new techniques or procedures, case reports, and articles on the ethical and social aspects of related health care. Original research published in INR is related to the practice of interventional neuroradiology...
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信