Influence of midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens on fluid reservoir thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.

IF 4.1 3区 医学 Q1 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo, Ana Amorim-de-Sousa, José M González-Méijome
{"title":"Influence of midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens on fluid reservoir thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.","authors":"Rute J Macedo-de-Araújo, Ana Amorim-de-Sousa, José M González-Méijome","doi":"10.1016/j.clae.2024.102250","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To investigate whether the midday removal and re-application of scleral lenses (SL) influences fluid reservoir (FR) thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two clinical experiments were conducted. A total of 49 keratoconic eyes were evaluated for Part1(tear film and visual acuity analysis) and 12 keratoconic eyes for Part2 (FR thickness analysis). All subjects were wearing 16.4 mm SL for more than 12-months. Tear Film Surface Quality (TFSQ) was evaluated with Medmont E300 at more than 120 min of SL wear, 10 min after SL removal (pre-corneal TFSQ) and 5 min after re-apply the same SL. High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity (HCVA and LCVA) were also assessed with the SL on eye (before and after re-application). For Part2, Anterior OCT (MOptim MOcean4000, China) measurements were taken with and without the SL (at the same time points of Part1) and three outcomes were evaluated: FR thickness, SL thickness (control measurement) and corneal thickness.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Removing and re-applying a SL had a statistically significant positive impact on TFSQ, with an improvement from 0.26 ± 011 to 0.16 ± 0.08 (p = 0.001). This was accompanied by a statistically significant improvement in LogMAR HCVA (from 0.10 ± 0.09 to 0.08 ± 0.08, p < 0.001) and LCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.13 to 0.36 ± 0.13, p < 0.001). Regarding Part2 of the study, a statistically significant increase in FR thickness was observed after SL re-application (from 223.64 ± 48.08 µm to 267.81 ± 80.03 µm, p = 0.007). No changes in corneal thickness were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens positively impacted pre-lens tear film surface quality, although the observed improvement in visual acuity does not constitute a clinically significant change. Clinicians should consider that removing and reapplying a scleral lens may result in an overestimation of the fluid reservoir thickness, which could affect clinical assessments and treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":49087,"journal":{"name":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contact Lens & Anterior Eye","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clae.2024.102250","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate whether the midday removal and re-application of scleral lenses (SL) influences fluid reservoir (FR) thickness, pre-lens tear film quality and visual acuity.

Methods: Two clinical experiments were conducted. A total of 49 keratoconic eyes were evaluated for Part1(tear film and visual acuity analysis) and 12 keratoconic eyes for Part2 (FR thickness analysis). All subjects were wearing 16.4 mm SL for more than 12-months. Tear Film Surface Quality (TFSQ) was evaluated with Medmont E300 at more than 120 min of SL wear, 10 min after SL removal (pre-corneal TFSQ) and 5 min after re-apply the same SL. High and Low Contrast Visual Acuity (HCVA and LCVA) were also assessed with the SL on eye (before and after re-application). For Part2, Anterior OCT (MOptim MOcean4000, China) measurements were taken with and without the SL (at the same time points of Part1) and three outcomes were evaluated: FR thickness, SL thickness (control measurement) and corneal thickness.

Results: Removing and re-applying a SL had a statistically significant positive impact on TFSQ, with an improvement from 0.26 ± 011 to 0.16 ± 0.08 (p = 0.001). This was accompanied by a statistically significant improvement in LogMAR HCVA (from 0.10 ± 0.09 to 0.08 ± 0.08, p < 0.001) and LCVA (from 0.39 ± 0.13 to 0.36 ± 0.13, p < 0.001). Regarding Part2 of the study, a statistically significant increase in FR thickness was observed after SL re-application (from 223.64 ± 48.08 µm to 267.81 ± 80.03 µm, p = 0.007). No changes in corneal thickness were observed.

Conclusions: Midday removal and re-application of a scleral lens positively impacted pre-lens tear film surface quality, although the observed improvement in visual acuity does not constitute a clinically significant change. Clinicians should consider that removing and reapplying a scleral lens may result in an overestimation of the fluid reservoir thickness, which could affect clinical assessments and treatment decisions.

中午摘除和重新佩戴巩膜透镜对储液厚度、透镜前泪膜质量和视力的影响。
目的:研究中午摘戴巩膜塑形镜(SL)是否会影响储液池(FR)厚度、镜前泪膜质量和视力:方法:进行了两项临床实验。第一部分(泪膜和视力分析)共评估了 49 只角膜病变眼,第二部分(泪液储库厚度分析)共评估了 12 只角膜病变眼。所有受试者均配戴 16.4 mm SL 超过 12 个月。泪膜表面质量(TFSQ)用 Medmont E300 进行评估,评估时间为戴镜超过 120 分钟、摘镜后 10 分钟(角膜前 TFSQ)和重新戴镜后 5 分钟。此外,还对戴镜后的高低对比度视力(HCVA 和 LCVA)进行了评估(重新戴镜前后)。在第 2 部分中,在使用和未使用 SL 的情况下(与第 1 部分的时间点相同)进行了前部 OCT(MOptim MOcean4000,中国)测量,并评估了三项结果:结果:结果:去除角膜塑形镜并重新涂上角膜塑形镜对 TFSQ 有显著的统计学积极影响,从 0.26 ± 011 降至 0.16 ± 0.08(p = 0.001)。与此同时,LogMAR HCVA 也有了明显改善(从 0.10 ± 0.09 降至 0.08 ± 0.08,p 结论):中午摘除和重新配戴巩膜透镜对透镜前泪膜表面质量有积极影响,尽管观察到的视力改善并不构成有临床意义的变化。临床医生应考虑到摘除和重新配戴巩膜透镜可能会导致高估储液厚度,从而影响临床评估和治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
18.80%
发文量
198
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Contact Lens & Anterior Eye is a research-based journal covering all aspects of contact lens theory and practice, including original articles on invention and innovations, as well as the regular features of: Case Reports; Literary Reviews; Editorials; Instrumentation and Techniques and Dates of Professional Meetings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信