[Pollution Characteristics and Multilevel Risk Assessments of Antibiotics in the Urban Rivers of Beijing, China].

Q2 Environmental Science
Xiao-Shuai Zhao, Qi-Bing Zheng, Rui Ma, Heng Zhang, Miao Chen, Chang-Sheng Guo
{"title":"[Pollution Characteristics and Multilevel Risk Assessments of Antibiotics in the Urban Rivers of Beijing, China].","authors":"Xiao-Shuai Zhao, Qi-Bing Zheng, Rui Ma, Heng Zhang, Miao Chen, Chang-Sheng Guo","doi":"10.13227/j.hjkx.202304094","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To comprehensively assess the pollution characteristics and ecological risks of antibiotics in the rivers in Beijing, the concentrations of 35 common antibiotics belonging to four categories were quantified by using solid phase extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The ecological risks of antibiotics were evaluated using the methods of risk quotient (RQ) and joint probability curves (JPCs). The results showed that a total of 33 antibiotics were detected in the surface water of ten rivers in Beijing, and the total concentrations of antibiotics ranged from N.D. to 1 573.57 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>. Sulfamethoxazole showed the highest concentration (N.D.-160.04 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>), followed by sulfadiazine (0.09-147.90 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>) and ofloxacin (0.28-94.72 ng·L<sup>-1</sup>). There were 16 antibiotics with a detection frequency greater than 50.0 %. The RQ method showed that there were 12 antibiotics with potential ecological risks. Tetracycline, clarithromycin, and trimethoprim showed the highest risks, with RQs of 3.99, 1.86, and 1.01, respectively. The risks of antibiotics at the outlets of wastewater treatment plants were higher than those in mainstream rivers. The PNEC exceedance rates of tetracycline, clarithromycin, and trimethoprim were above 2.3 %. Based on JPCs, the maximum risk product of clarithromycin was 1.66 %, and it showed low risks to 0.3 %-7.0 % of species. The risks of other antibiotics could be ignored. The detection frequency, distribution of concentrations, most sensitive species, and species sensitivity distribution of antibiotics had important impacts on the ecological risk assessment. Using the multilevel ecological risk assessment strategy can effectively avoid inadequate protection and overprotection and is also conducive to the hierarchical and zoning management of antibiotics throughout the region.</p>","PeriodicalId":35937,"journal":{"name":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13227/j.hjkx.202304094","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To comprehensively assess the pollution characteristics and ecological risks of antibiotics in the rivers in Beijing, the concentrations of 35 common antibiotics belonging to four categories were quantified by using solid phase extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The ecological risks of antibiotics were evaluated using the methods of risk quotient (RQ) and joint probability curves (JPCs). The results showed that a total of 33 antibiotics were detected in the surface water of ten rivers in Beijing, and the total concentrations of antibiotics ranged from N.D. to 1 573.57 ng·L-1. Sulfamethoxazole showed the highest concentration (N.D.-160.04 ng·L-1), followed by sulfadiazine (0.09-147.90 ng·L-1) and ofloxacin (0.28-94.72 ng·L-1). There were 16 antibiotics with a detection frequency greater than 50.0 %. The RQ method showed that there were 12 antibiotics with potential ecological risks. Tetracycline, clarithromycin, and trimethoprim showed the highest risks, with RQs of 3.99, 1.86, and 1.01, respectively. The risks of antibiotics at the outlets of wastewater treatment plants were higher than those in mainstream rivers. The PNEC exceedance rates of tetracycline, clarithromycin, and trimethoprim were above 2.3 %. Based on JPCs, the maximum risk product of clarithromycin was 1.66 %, and it showed low risks to 0.3 %-7.0 % of species. The risks of other antibiotics could be ignored. The detection frequency, distribution of concentrations, most sensitive species, and species sensitivity distribution of antibiotics had important impacts on the ecological risk assessment. Using the multilevel ecological risk assessment strategy can effectively avoid inadequate protection and overprotection and is also conducive to the hierarchical and zoning management of antibiotics throughout the region.

[中国北京城市河流的污染特征及抗生素的多层次风险评估]。
为全面评估北京地区河流中抗生素的污染特征和生态风险,采用固相萃取-高效液相色谱-串联质谱法对4类35种常见抗生素的浓度进行了定量分析。采用风险商(RQ)和联合概率曲线(JPCs)的方法对抗生素的生态风险进行了评估。结果表明,在北京 10 条河流的地表水中,共检测到 33 种抗生素,抗生素的总浓度范围为 N.D. 至 1 573.57 ng-L-1。浓度最高的是磺胺甲噁唑(N.D.-160.04 ng-L-1),其次是磺胺嘧啶(0.09-147.90 ng-L-1)和氧氟沙星(0.28-94.72 ng-L-1)。有 16 种抗生素的检测频率大于 50.0%。RQ 方法显示,有 12 种抗生素具有潜在的生态风险。四环素、克拉霉素和三甲氧苄氨嘧啶的风险最高,RQ 分别为 3.99、1.86 和 1.01。污水处理厂出水口的抗生素风险高于主流河流。四环素、克拉霉素和三甲氧苄啶的 PNEC 超标率均超过 2.3%。根据日本农药残留标准,克拉霉素的最大风险积为 1.66%,对 0.3%-7.0% 的物种风险较低。其他抗生素的风险可以忽略。抗生素的检测频率、浓度分布、最敏感物种和物种敏感性分布对生态风险评估有重要影响。采用多层次生态风险评估策略可有效避免保护不足和过度保护,也有利于在全区范围内对抗生素进行分级、分区管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science
Huanjing Kexue/Environmental Science Environmental Science-Environmental Science (all)
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15329
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信