Does Swimming Exercise Impair Bone Health? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Evidence in Humans and Rodent Models.

IF 9.3 1区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES
Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1007/s40279-024-02052-x
Laura Freitas, Andrea Bezerra, Giorjines Boppre, Tânia Amorim, Ricardo J Fernandes, Hélder Fonseca
{"title":"Does Swimming Exercise Impair Bone Health? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing the Evidence in Humans and Rodent Models.","authors":"Laura Freitas, Andrea Bezerra, Giorjines Boppre, Tânia Amorim, Ricardo J Fernandes, Hélder Fonseca","doi":"10.1007/s40279-024-02052-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effect of swimming on bone health remains unclear, namely due to discrepant findings between studies in humans and animal models.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to identify the available evidence on the effects of swimming on bone mass, geometry and microarchitecture at the lumbar spine, femur and tibia in both humans and rodent animal models.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD4202236347 and CRD42022363714 for human and animal studies). Two different systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, retrieving 36 and 16 reports for humans and animal models, respectively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In humans, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was similar between swimmers and non-athletic controls at the lumbar spine, hip and femoral neck. Swimmers' tibia diaphysis showed a higher cross-sectional area but lower cortical thickness. Inconsistent findings at the femoral neck cortical thickness were found. Due to the small number of studies, trabecular microarchitecture in human swimmers was not assessed. In rodent models, aBMD was found to be lower at the tibia, but similar at the femur. Inconsistent findings in femur diaphysis cross-sectional area were observed. No differences in femur and tibia trabecular microarchitecture were found.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Swimming seems to affect bone health differently according to anatomical region. Studies in both humans and rodent models suggest that tibia cortical bone is negatively affected by swimming. There was no evidence of a negative effect of swimming on other bone regions, both in humans and animal models.</p>","PeriodicalId":21969,"journal":{"name":"Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2373-2394"},"PeriodicalIF":9.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s40279-024-02052-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effect of swimming on bone health remains unclear, namely due to discrepant findings between studies in humans and animal models.

Objective: The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to identify the available evidence on the effects of swimming on bone mass, geometry and microarchitecture at the lumbar spine, femur and tibia in both humans and rodent animal models.

Methods: The study followed PRISMA guidelines and was registered at PROSPERO (CRD4202236347 and CRD42022363714 for human and animal studies). Two different systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science, retrieving 36 and 16 reports for humans and animal models, respectively.

Results: In humans, areal bone mineral density (aBMD) was similar between swimmers and non-athletic controls at the lumbar spine, hip and femoral neck. Swimmers' tibia diaphysis showed a higher cross-sectional area but lower cortical thickness. Inconsistent findings at the femoral neck cortical thickness were found. Due to the small number of studies, trabecular microarchitecture in human swimmers was not assessed. In rodent models, aBMD was found to be lower at the tibia, but similar at the femur. Inconsistent findings in femur diaphysis cross-sectional area were observed. No differences in femur and tibia trabecular microarchitecture were found.

Conclusion: Swimming seems to affect bone health differently according to anatomical region. Studies in both humans and rodent models suggest that tibia cortical bone is negatively affected by swimming. There was no evidence of a negative effect of swimming on other bone regions, both in humans and animal models.

Abstract Image

游泳运动会损害骨骼健康吗?比较人类和啮齿动物模型证据的系统回顾和元分析》。
背景:游泳对骨骼健康的影响仍不明确,这主要是由于人类和动物模型的研究结果不一致:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在确定游泳对人类和啮齿类动物模型腰椎、股骨和胫骨的骨量、几何形状和微结构影响的现有证据:该研究遵循了 PRISMA 准则,并在 PROSPERO 注册(人类和动物研究分别为 CRD4202236347 和 CRD42022363714)。在 PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science 上进行了两次不同的系统文献检索,分别检索到 36 篇和 16 篇关于人类和动物模型的报告:结果:在人类中,游泳者和非运动对照组的腰椎、髋部和股骨颈的骨矿物质密度(aBMD)相似。游泳运动员的胫骨干骺端横截面积较大,但皮质厚度较低。股骨颈皮质厚度的研究结果不一致。由于研究数量较少,因此没有对人类游泳者的骨小梁微结构进行评估。在啮齿动物模型中,发现胫骨的 aBMD 较低,但股骨的 aBMD 相似。股骨干骺端横截面积的研究结果不一致。股骨和胫骨骨小梁微结构没有发现差异:结论:游泳对骨骼健康的影响似乎因解剖区域而异。对人类和啮齿动物模型的研究表明,游泳会对胫骨皮质骨产生负面影响。在人类和动物模型中,没有证据表明游泳会对其他骨骼区域产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Sports Medicine
Sports Medicine 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
18.40
自引率
5.10%
发文量
165
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Sports Medicine focuses on providing definitive and comprehensive review articles that interpret and evaluate current literature, aiming to offer insights into research findings in the sports medicine and exercise field. The journal covers major topics such as sports medicine and sports science, medical syndromes associated with sport and exercise, clinical medicine's role in injury prevention and treatment, exercise for rehabilitation and health, and the application of physiological and biomechanical principles to specific sports. Types of Articles: Review Articles: Definitive and comprehensive reviews that interpret and evaluate current literature to provide rationale for and application of research findings. Leading/Current Opinion Articles: Overviews of contentious or emerging issues in the field. Original Research Articles: High-quality research articles. Enhanced Features: Additional features like slide sets, videos, and animations aimed at increasing the visibility, readership, and educational value of the journal's content. Plain Language Summaries: Summaries accompanying articles to assist readers in understanding important medical advances. Peer Review Process: All manuscripts undergo peer review by international experts to ensure quality and rigor. The journal also welcomes Letters to the Editor, which will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信