Dissociation training and symptom identification accuracy among Australian psychologists.

IF 2.3 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Niclés S A Bestel, Danielle C Williamson, Loredana Tirlea, Jessica L Mackelprang
{"title":"Dissociation training and symptom identification accuracy among Australian psychologists.","authors":"Niclés S A Bestel, Danielle C Williamson, Loredana Tirlea, Jessica L Mackelprang","doi":"10.1037/tra0001717","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Dissociation is a common but underrecognized sequelae of trauma exposure. We investigated Australian psychologists' training in dissociation, assessment practices, and accuracy in identifying dissociation symptoms.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>Participants in this cross-sectional study of Australian psychologists (<i>N</i> = 280) were recruited through publicly available email addresses, graduate psychology programs, and social media. Participants estimated the percentages of their clients who had experienced trauma and had dissociative symptoms, their confidence in assessing and treating trauma and dissociation, their training in trauma and dissociation, and their dissociation screening practices. Participants were also asked to identify dissociation symptoms (per the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II and Somatic Dissociation Questionnaire-5) from a list of trauma-related symptoms.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Although 99% of participants reported treating trauma-exposed clients, only 59.6% and 41.1% reported formal training in trauma or dissociation during their psychology qualification, respectively. One in five participants correctly identified all psychoform and somatoform symptoms as dissociation. Accurately identifying psychoform dissociation symptoms was associated with confidence in treating dissociation (<i>p</i> = .048) and having informal peer consultation on dissociation (<i>p</i> = .032). Accurately identifying somatoform dissociation was associated with confidence assessing (<i>p</i> = .006) and treating (<i>p</i> = .009) dissociation and having completed professional development on dissociation (<i>p</i> = .047).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Most psychologists demonstrated inaccuracies in their knowledge of dissociation, which raises concern that dissociation may not be recognized in clinical practice and thus go untreated. Training on dissociation should be incorporated into psychology curricula, particularly at the graduate level, and accessible, cost-effective professional development programs for practicing clinicians are needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).</p>","PeriodicalId":20982,"journal":{"name":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","volume":" ","pages":"1707-1716"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychological trauma : theory, research, practice and policy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/tra0001717","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Dissociation is a common but underrecognized sequelae of trauma exposure. We investigated Australian psychologists' training in dissociation, assessment practices, and accuracy in identifying dissociation symptoms.

Method: Participants in this cross-sectional study of Australian psychologists (N = 280) were recruited through publicly available email addresses, graduate psychology programs, and social media. Participants estimated the percentages of their clients who had experienced trauma and had dissociative symptoms, their confidence in assessing and treating trauma and dissociation, their training in trauma and dissociation, and their dissociation screening practices. Participants were also asked to identify dissociation symptoms (per the Dissociative Experiences Scale-II and Somatic Dissociation Questionnaire-5) from a list of trauma-related symptoms.

Results: Although 99% of participants reported treating trauma-exposed clients, only 59.6% and 41.1% reported formal training in trauma or dissociation during their psychology qualification, respectively. One in five participants correctly identified all psychoform and somatoform symptoms as dissociation. Accurately identifying psychoform dissociation symptoms was associated with confidence in treating dissociation (p = .048) and having informal peer consultation on dissociation (p = .032). Accurately identifying somatoform dissociation was associated with confidence assessing (p = .006) and treating (p = .009) dissociation and having completed professional development on dissociation (p = .047).

Conclusions: Most psychologists demonstrated inaccuracies in their knowledge of dissociation, which raises concern that dissociation may not be recognized in clinical practice and thus go untreated. Training on dissociation should be incorporated into psychology curricula, particularly at the graduate level, and accessible, cost-effective professional development programs for practicing clinicians are needed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

澳大利亚心理学家的解离训练和症状识别准确性。
目的:解离是一种常见的创伤后遗症,但却未得到充分认识。我们调查了澳大利亚心理学家在解离方面的培训、评估方法以及识别解离症状的准确性:这项横断面研究通过公开的电子邮件地址、心理学研究生课程和社交媒体招募澳大利亚心理学家(N = 280)。参与者估计了他们的客户中经历过创伤并有解离症状的比例、他们在评估和治疗创伤与解离方面的信心、他们在创伤与解离方面的培训以及他们的解离筛查方法。参与者还被要求从与创伤相关的症状列表中识别解离症状(根据解离体验量表 II 和躯体解离问卷-5):尽管 99% 的参与者表示曾治疗过遭受创伤的客户,但只有 59.6% 和 41.1% 的参与者表示在获得心理学资格期间分别接受过创伤或解离方面的正规培训。五分之一的参与者正确地将所有精神形式和躯体形式症状识别为解离。准确识别精神形式解离症状与治疗解离症状的信心(p = .048)和就解离症状进行非正式同伴咨询(p = .032)有关。准确识别躯体形式解离与评估(p = .006)和治疗(p = .009)解离的信心以及完成解离专业发展(p = .047)有关:大多数心理学家对解离的认识不准确,这让人担心解离可能在临床实践中得不到认可,从而得不到治疗。有关解离的培训应纳入心理学课程,尤其是研究生阶段的课程,并且需要为执业临床医师提供方便、经济有效的专业发展项目。(PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, 版权所有)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.20
自引率
3.20%
发文量
427
期刊介绍: Psychological Trauma: Theory, Research, Practice, and Policy publishes empirical research on the psychological effects of trauma. The journal is intended to be a forum for an interdisciplinary discussion on trauma, blending science, theory, practice, and policy. The journal publishes empirical research on a wide range of trauma-related topics, including: -Psychological treatments and effects -Promotion of education about effects of and treatment for trauma -Assessment and diagnosis of trauma -Pathophysiology of trauma reactions -Health services (delivery of services to trauma populations) -Epidemiological studies and risk factor studies -Neuroimaging studies -Trauma and cultural competence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信