Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review.

IF 2 Q2 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE
Setareh Hosseinpour, Mohammad Hadi Khademi, Maryam Erfani, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Artak Heboyan
{"title":"Are implant-based treatments considered viable for patients with focal or florid cemento-osseous dysplasia? A systematic review.","authors":"Setareh Hosseinpour, Mohammad Hadi Khademi, Maryam Erfani, Seyed Ali Mosaddad, Artak Heboyan","doi":"10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients.</p><p><strong>Main text: </strong>Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.</p>","PeriodicalId":18357,"journal":{"name":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189879/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40902-024-00432-x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Focal and florid cemento-osseous dysplasia are benign fibro-osseous lesions affecting the quality and quantity of the jawbones. This study aimed to determine the viability of implant-based approaches in the affected patients.

Main text: Different scientific databases, including PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar, were searched until October 8, 2023, using a pre-determined search strategy. Two reviewers screened the retrieved reports and extracted the required information from the included studies. The eligibility criteria included English-language case reports/series or clinical trials. The JBI critical appraisal checklist for case reports was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. Three studies were deemed eligible to be included in this study out of the initial 202 records found. Five implants were placed in three patients, positioned in the proximity of the lesion area, without any additional treatment to remove the pathology. The mandibular posterior area was the affected site in all patients. Only one implant failed in one patient after 16 years, which was attributed to peri-implantitis and not the lesion. Other implants demonstrated successful maintenance over follow-up periods.

Conclusions: Although the number of the included records was relatively low to draw firm conclusions, it seems that implant-based treatments in patients with focal/florid cemento-osseous dysplasia could be viable, considering a conservative and well-planned approach.

对局灶性或花斑状骨水泥骨发育不良的患者来说,种植治疗是否可行?系统综述。
背景:局灶性和多发性骨水泥骨发育不良是影响颌骨质量和数量的良性纤维骨病变。本研究旨在确定受影响患者使用种植体方法的可行性:采用预先确定的检索策略,在2023年10月8日前检索了不同的科学数据库,包括PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、Web of Science、Embase、Cochrane Library和Google Scholar。两名审稿人对检索到的报告进行了筛选,并从纳入的研究中提取了所需的信息。合格标准包括英文病例报告/系列研究或临床试验。JBI 病例报告批判性评估清单用于评估纳入研究的方法学质量。在最初找到的 202 份记录中,有三项研究被认为符合纳入本研究的条件。在三名患者的病变部位附近植入了五颗种植体,没有采取任何额外的治疗来消除病变。所有患者的病变部位均为下颌后部。只有一名患者的一颗种植体在 16 年后失败,原因是种植体周围炎而不是病变。其他种植体在随访期间都得到了成功的维护:虽然纳入的病例数量相对较少,无法得出确切的结论,但从保守和周密计划的角度来看,对局灶性/叶状骨水泥骨发育不良患者进行种植治疗似乎是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信