Neurocognitive performance of badminton players at different competitive levels in visuospatial attention tasks.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Experimental Brain Research Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-20 DOI:10.1007/s00221-024-06872-1
Cheng-Liang Chang, Yu-Chia Gan, Chien-Yu Pan, Yu-Ting Tseng, Tsai-Chiao Wang, Chia-Liang Tsai
{"title":"Neurocognitive performance of badminton players at different competitive levels in visuospatial attention tasks.","authors":"Cheng-Liang Chang, Yu-Chia Gan, Chien-Yu Pan, Yu-Ting Tseng, Tsai-Chiao Wang, Chia-Liang Tsai","doi":"10.1007/s00221-024-06872-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Visuospatial attention (VSA) is a cognitive function that enables athletes, particularly those engaged in open-skill sports, to allocate attentional resources efficiently to the appropriate target and in the appropriate direction. Studies have indicated that expert players exhibit superior cognitive performance to that of novices. However, no study has investigated differences in VSA performance among elite, expert, and intermediate badminton players or the potential neurophysiological mechanisms underlying such differences. Accordingly, the present study explored neuropsychological and neurophysiological parameters during VSA tasks among badminton players of varying competitive levels. The study included 54 participants and divided them into three groups according to their competition records: elite (n = 18), expert (n = 18), and intermediate (n = 18). Their neuropsychological performance and brain event-related potentials (ERPs) during the Posner cueing paradigm were collected. Although the three groups did not differ in their accuracy rates, ERP N2 amplitudes, or N2 or P3 latencies, the elite and expert groups exhibited notably faster reaction times and more pronounced P3 amplitudes than did the intermediate group during the cognitive task. However, we did not observe these between-group differences when we controlled for the covariate training years. Additionally, the elite and expert groups exhibited comparable neurocognitive performance. These findings indicate that badminton players' competitive levels influence their VSA. However, the beneficial effects on neuropsychological and neurophysiological performance could stabilize after a certain level of badminton competence is reached. Year of training could also be a major factor influencing badminton players' neurocognitive performance in VSA tasks.</p>","PeriodicalId":12268,"journal":{"name":"Experimental Brain Research","volume":" ","pages":"1933-1946"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Experimental Brain Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00221-024-06872-1","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Visuospatial attention (VSA) is a cognitive function that enables athletes, particularly those engaged in open-skill sports, to allocate attentional resources efficiently to the appropriate target and in the appropriate direction. Studies have indicated that expert players exhibit superior cognitive performance to that of novices. However, no study has investigated differences in VSA performance among elite, expert, and intermediate badminton players or the potential neurophysiological mechanisms underlying such differences. Accordingly, the present study explored neuropsychological and neurophysiological parameters during VSA tasks among badminton players of varying competitive levels. The study included 54 participants and divided them into three groups according to their competition records: elite (n = 18), expert (n = 18), and intermediate (n = 18). Their neuropsychological performance and brain event-related potentials (ERPs) during the Posner cueing paradigm were collected. Although the three groups did not differ in their accuracy rates, ERP N2 amplitudes, or N2 or P3 latencies, the elite and expert groups exhibited notably faster reaction times and more pronounced P3 amplitudes than did the intermediate group during the cognitive task. However, we did not observe these between-group differences when we controlled for the covariate training years. Additionally, the elite and expert groups exhibited comparable neurocognitive performance. These findings indicate that badminton players' competitive levels influence their VSA. However, the beneficial effects on neuropsychological and neurophysiological performance could stabilize after a certain level of badminton competence is reached. Year of training could also be a major factor influencing badminton players' neurocognitive performance in VSA tasks.

Abstract Image

不同竞技水平的羽毛球运动员在视觉空间注意力任务中的神经认知表现。
视觉空间注意力(VSA)是一种认知功能,它能使运动员,尤其是那些从事开放性技能运动的运动员,将注意力资源有效地分配到适当的目标和适当的方向上。研究表明,专业运动员的认知表现优于新手。然而,还没有研究调查过羽毛球精英、专家和中级运动员在 VSA 表现上的差异,也没有研究过这种差异背后潜在的神经生理机制。因此,本研究探讨了不同竞技水平的羽毛球运动员在执行 VSA 任务时的神经心理学和神经生理学参数。本研究包括 54 名参与者,根据他们的比赛记录将他们分为三组:精英组(18 人)、专家组(18 人)和中级组(18 人)。研究收集了他们的神经心理学表现以及在 Posner 提示范式中的大脑事件相关电位(ERPs)。虽然三组在准确率、ERP N2 振幅、N2 或 P3 潜伏期方面没有差异,但精英组和专家组在认知任务中的反应时间和 P3 振幅明显快于中级组。然而,当我们对训练年限这一协变因素进行控制时,并没有观察到这些组间差异。此外,精英组和专家组的神经认知表现相当。这些研究结果表明,羽毛球运动员的竞技水平会影响他们的 VSA。不过,在羽毛球水平达到一定程度后,对神经心理和神经生理表现的有益影响可能会趋于稳定。训练年限也可能是影响羽毛球运动员在 VSA 任务中神经认知表现的一个主要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
5.00%
发文量
228
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Founded in 1966, Experimental Brain Research publishes original contributions on many aspects of experimental research of the central and peripheral nervous system. The focus is on molecular, physiology, behavior, neurochemistry, developmental, cellular and molecular neurobiology, and experimental pathology relevant to general problems of cerebral function. The journal publishes original papers, reviews, and mini-reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信