Movement and Pressure Injury Prevention Care for Nursing Home Residents: Addressing the Nescience.

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Tracey L Yap, Jenny Alderden, Kais Gadhoumi, Susan D Horn, Sharon Eve Sonenblum, Judith C Hays, Susan M Kennerly
{"title":"Movement and Pressure Injury Prevention Care for Nursing Home Residents: Addressing the Nescience.","authors":"Tracey L Yap, Jenny Alderden, Kais Gadhoumi, Susan D Horn, Sharon Eve Sonenblum, Judith C Hays, Susan M Kennerly","doi":"10.1097/ASW.0000000000000165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare movement associated with position changes among nursing home residents who remain in lying versus upright positions for more than 2 hours and among residents living with obesity, dementia, or neither condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors conducted a descriptive exploratory study using secondary data (N = 934) from the Turn Everyone And Move for Ulcer Prevention (TEAM-UP) clinical trial to examine transient movements (<60 seconds) within prolonged periods of 2 to 5 hours without repositioning.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Nursing home residents exhibit significantly more episodic transient movements when upright than lying. Residents with obesity or dementia exhibited similar frequencies of episodic transient movements compared with residents with neither obesity nor dementia. Upright or lying movements were more frequent among residents with obesity than among those with neither obesity nor dementia selectively when prolonged events ranged from 2 to 4 hours. Pairwise comparisons of movement rates among resident subgroups (living with obesity, living with dementia, or neither group) across repositioning intervals showed episodic transient movements were significantly higher across all subgroups for repositioning intervals up to 3 hours when compared with repositioning intervals of greater than 3 hours.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings challenge assumptions that nursing home residents are inactive and at risk for prolonged sitting. These preliminary findings, along with TEAM-UP findings where no pressure injuries occurred in up to 5 hours in prolonged positions, support establishing a standard 3-hour repositioning interval with use of high-density mattresses without a negative impact on pressure injury occurrence. There should be caution when considering repositioning intervals greater than 3 hours. Further research is indicated to explore protective effect of episodic transient movements of other subgroups.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11207196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ASW.0000000000000165","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To compare movement associated with position changes among nursing home residents who remain in lying versus upright positions for more than 2 hours and among residents living with obesity, dementia, or neither condition.

Methods: The authors conducted a descriptive exploratory study using secondary data (N = 934) from the Turn Everyone And Move for Ulcer Prevention (TEAM-UP) clinical trial to examine transient movements (<60 seconds) within prolonged periods of 2 to 5 hours without repositioning.

Results: Nursing home residents exhibit significantly more episodic transient movements when upright than lying. Residents with obesity or dementia exhibited similar frequencies of episodic transient movements compared with residents with neither obesity nor dementia. Upright or lying movements were more frequent among residents with obesity than among those with neither obesity nor dementia selectively when prolonged events ranged from 2 to 4 hours. Pairwise comparisons of movement rates among resident subgroups (living with obesity, living with dementia, or neither group) across repositioning intervals showed episodic transient movements were significantly higher across all subgroups for repositioning intervals up to 3 hours when compared with repositioning intervals of greater than 3 hours.

Conclusions: Findings challenge assumptions that nursing home residents are inactive and at risk for prolonged sitting. These preliminary findings, along with TEAM-UP findings where no pressure injuries occurred in up to 5 hours in prolonged positions, support establishing a standard 3-hour repositioning interval with use of high-density mattresses without a negative impact on pressure injury occurrence. There should be caution when considering repositioning intervals greater than 3 hours. Further research is indicated to explore protective effect of episodic transient movements of other subgroups.

养老院住户的运动和压伤预防护理:解决科学难题。
摘要比较养老院居民在保持卧姿和直立姿势超过 2 小时后,以及在患有肥胖症、痴呆症或两种病症的居民中,与体位变化相关的运动情况:作者利用 "预防溃疡的翻身和移动"(TEAM-UP)临床试验的二手数据(N = 934)进行了一项描述性探索研究,以检查瞬时运动(结果:护理院居民的瞬时运动明显多于直立体位的居民:养老院居民直立时的偶发性瞬时运动明显多于躺卧时。与既无肥胖症也无痴呆症的居民相比,患有肥胖症或痴呆症的居民表现出相似的偶发性瞬时运动频率。在持续时间为 2 到 4 小时的情况下,肥胖症患者直立或躺卧的运动频率要高于既无肥胖症也无痴呆症的患者。对居民亚组(肥胖症、痴呆症或两组均无)在不同重新定位时间间隔内的运动率进行配对比较后发现,在所有亚组中,重新定位时间间隔不超过3小时的偶发瞬时运动明显高于重新定位时间间隔超过3小时的运动:研究结果对养老院居民不爱活动和有久坐风险的假设提出了质疑。这些初步研究结果以及 TEAM-UP 的研究结果表明,在长达 5 小时的长时间体位中未发生压伤,这支持在使用高密度床垫的情况下确定 3 小时的标准体位调整间隔,而不会对压伤的发生产生负面影响。在考虑超过 3 小时的调整间隔时应谨慎。需要进一步开展研究,探索其他亚组的偶发性短暂移动的保护作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信