Unveiling the impact of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy on portal hemodynamics and survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a prospective study

IF 2.3 3区 医学 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Yaozu Liu, Fangmin Meng, Jingqin Ma, Wen Zhang, Jiaze Yu, Yongjie Zhou, Wuxu Zuo, Zhiping Yan, Cuizhen Pan, Jianjun Luo
{"title":"Unveiling the impact of cirrhotic cardiomyopathy on portal hemodynamics and survival after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt: a prospective study","authors":"Yaozu Liu,&nbsp;Fangmin Meng,&nbsp;Jingqin Ma,&nbsp;Wen Zhang,&nbsp;Jiaze Yu,&nbsp;Yongjie Zhou,&nbsp;Wuxu Zuo,&nbsp;Zhiping Yan,&nbsp;Cuizhen Pan,&nbsp;Jianjun Luo","doi":"10.1007/s00261-024-04446-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background and aims</h3><p>The placement of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) results in a sudden increase in central circulating blood volume, which requires proper regulation of the cardiovascular system. We aimed to investigate the impact of TIPS on cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM).</p><h3>Method</h3><p>A consecutive case series of patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS were evaluated by echocardiography and pressure measurements before, immediately after TIPS and 2–4 days later (delayed). Furthermore, all patients underwent a one-year follow-up.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>In this study, 107 patients were enrolled, 38 (35.5%) with CCM. Echocardiography revealed an increase in postoperative left ventricular filling pressure accompanied by an elevation in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, patients in the CCM group exhibited lower LVEF and mean arterial pressure (MAP) compared to the non-CCM group. Post-TIPS, CCM patients showed increased right atrium pressure (RAP) that normalized within 2–4 days, whereas non-CCM patients had lower RAP than baseline. Compared to patient without CCM, CCM patients revealed lower immediate (16.7 ± 4.4 vs. 18.9 ± 4.8, <i>p</i> = 0.022) and delayed 15.9 ± 3.7 vs. 17.7 ± 5.3, <i>p</i> = 0.044) portal vein pressures (PVP) and portal pressure gradients (PPG) (7.7 ± 3.4 vs. 9.2 ± 3.6, <i>p</i> = 0.032 and 10.1 ± 3.1 vs. 12.3 ± 4.9, <i>p</i> = 0.013). The 1-year mortality rates were 13.2% for CCM patients and 4.3% for non-CCM patients (log-rank test, <i>p</i> = 0.093), with MELD score, and preoperative RAP significantly associated with the mortality.</p><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Cirrhotic patients with CCM exhibit lower PVP and PPG immediately after TIPS and 2–4 days later, without significantly impacting one-year survival outcomes.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7126,"journal":{"name":"Abdominal Radiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Abdominal Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00261-024-04446-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims

The placement of Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) results in a sudden increase in central circulating blood volume, which requires proper regulation of the cardiovascular system. We aimed to investigate the impact of TIPS on cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM).

Method

A consecutive case series of patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS were evaluated by echocardiography and pressure measurements before, immediately after TIPS and 2–4 days later (delayed). Furthermore, all patients underwent a one-year follow-up.

Results

In this study, 107 patients were enrolled, 38 (35.5%) with CCM. Echocardiography revealed an increase in postoperative left ventricular filling pressure accompanied by an elevation in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). However, patients in the CCM group exhibited lower LVEF and mean arterial pressure (MAP) compared to the non-CCM group. Post-TIPS, CCM patients showed increased right atrium pressure (RAP) that normalized within 2–4 days, whereas non-CCM patients had lower RAP than baseline. Compared to patient without CCM, CCM patients revealed lower immediate (16.7 ± 4.4 vs. 18.9 ± 4.8, p = 0.022) and delayed 15.9 ± 3.7 vs. 17.7 ± 5.3, p = 0.044) portal vein pressures (PVP) and portal pressure gradients (PPG) (7.7 ± 3.4 vs. 9.2 ± 3.6, p = 0.032 and 10.1 ± 3.1 vs. 12.3 ± 4.9, p = 0.013). The 1-year mortality rates were 13.2% for CCM patients and 4.3% for non-CCM patients (log-rank test, p = 0.093), with MELD score, and preoperative RAP significantly associated with the mortality.

Conclusion

Cirrhotic patients with CCM exhibit lower PVP and PPG immediately after TIPS and 2–4 days later, without significantly impacting one-year survival outcomes.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

揭示肝硬化心肌病对经颈静脉肝内门体分流术后门静脉血流动力学和存活率的影响:一项前瞻性研究。
背景和目的:经颈静脉肝内门体分流术(TIPS)会导致中心循环血容量突然增加,需要对心血管系统进行适当调节。我们旨在研究 TIPS 对肝硬化心肌病(CCM)的影响:方法:我们对接受 TIPS 的肝硬化患者进行了连续病例系列研究,通过超声心动图和压力测量对患者进行了评估,包括 TIPS 前、TIPS 后和 2-4 天后(延迟)。此外,所有患者都接受了为期一年的随访:本研究共纳入 107 例患者,其中 38 例(35.5%)患有 CCM。超声心动图显示,术后左心室充盈压增加,同时左心室射血分数(LVEF)升高。不过,与非 CCM 组相比,CCM 组患者的 LVEF 和平均动脉压 (MAP) 较低。TIPS 后,CCM 患者的右心房压力(RAP)升高,并在 2-4 天内恢复正常,而非 CCM 患者的 RAP 则低于基线。与非 CCM 患者相比,CCM 患者的即时(16.7 ± 4.4 vs. 18.9 ± 4.8,p = 0.022)和延迟(15.9 ± 3.7 vs. 17.7 ± 5.3,p = 0.044)门静脉压力(PVP)和门静脉压力梯度(PPG)(7.7 ± 3.4 vs. 9.2 ± 3.6,p = 0.032 和 10.1 ± 3.1 vs. 12.3 ± 4.9,p = 0.013)。CCM患者的1年死亡率为13.2%,非CCM患者为4.3%(对数秩检验,p = 0.093),MELD评分和术前RAP与死亡率显著相关:结论:CCM 肝硬化患者在 TIPS 术后即刻和 2-4 天后表现出较低的 PVP 和 PPG,但不会对一年生存率产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Abdominal Radiology
Abdominal Radiology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
334
期刊介绍: Abdominal Radiology seeks to meet the professional needs of the abdominal radiologist by publishing clinically pertinent original, review and practice related articles on the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tracts and abdominal interventional and radiologic procedures. Case reports are generally not accepted unless they are the first report of a new disease or condition, or part of a special solicited section. Reasons to Publish Your Article in Abdominal Radiology: · Official journal of the Society of Abdominal Radiology (SAR) · Published in Cooperation with: European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR) European Society of Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) Asian Society of Abdominal Radiology (ASAR) · Efficient handling and Expeditious review · Author feedback is provided in a mentoring style · Global readership · Readers can earn CME credits
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信