Biological and mechanical performance of calcium phosphate cements modified with phytic acid

IF 4.2 3区 医学 Q2 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Valentin C. Steinacker, Jan Weichhold, Tobias Renner, Sebastian Gubik, Andreas Vollmer, Niko Breitenbücher, Andreas Fuchs, Anton Straub, Stefan Hartmann, Alexander C. Kübler, Uwe Gbureck
{"title":"Biological and mechanical performance of calcium phosphate cements modified with phytic acid","authors":"Valentin C. Steinacker,&nbsp;Jan Weichhold,&nbsp;Tobias Renner,&nbsp;Sebastian Gubik,&nbsp;Andreas Vollmer,&nbsp;Niko Breitenbücher,&nbsp;Andreas Fuchs,&nbsp;Anton Straub,&nbsp;Stefan Hartmann,&nbsp;Alexander C. Kübler,&nbsp;Uwe Gbureck","doi":"10.1007/s10856-024-06805-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Calcium phosphate cements, primarily brushite cements, require the addition of setting retarders to ensure adequate processing time and processability. So far, citric acid has been the primary setting retarder used in this context. Due to the poor biocompatibility, it is crucial to explore alternative options for better processing. In recent years, the setting retarder phytic acid (IP6) has been increasingly investigated. This study investigates the biological behaviour of calcium phosphate cements with varying concentrations of IP6, in addition to their physical properties. Therefore cytocompatibility in vitro testing was performed using osteoblastic (MG-63) and osteoclastic (RAW 264.7 differentiated with RANKL) cells. We could demonstrate that the physical properties like the compressive strength of specimens formed with IP6 (brushite_IP6_5 = 11.2 MPa) were improved compared to the reference (brushite = 9.8 MPa). In osteoblast and osteoclast assays, IP6 exhibited significantly better cytocompatibility in terms of cell activity and cell number for brushite cements up to 11 times compared to the brushite reference. In contrast, the calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA) cements produced similar results for IP6 (CDHA_IP6_0.25 = 27.0 MPa) when compared to their reference (CDHA = 21.2 MPa). Interestingly, lower doses of IP6 were found to be more effective than higher doses with up to 3 times higher. Additionally, IP6 significantly increased degradation in both passive and active resorption. For these reasons, IP6 is emerging as a strong new competitor to established setting retarders such as citric acid. These cements have potential applications in bone augmentation, the stabilisation of non-load bearing fractures (craniofacial), or the cementation of metal implants.</p><h3>Graphical Abstract</h3><div><figure><div><div><picture><source><img></source></picture></div></div></figure></div></div>","PeriodicalId":647,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189980/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10856-024-06805-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Calcium phosphate cements, primarily brushite cements, require the addition of setting retarders to ensure adequate processing time and processability. So far, citric acid has been the primary setting retarder used in this context. Due to the poor biocompatibility, it is crucial to explore alternative options for better processing. In recent years, the setting retarder phytic acid (IP6) has been increasingly investigated. This study investigates the biological behaviour of calcium phosphate cements with varying concentrations of IP6, in addition to their physical properties. Therefore cytocompatibility in vitro testing was performed using osteoblastic (MG-63) and osteoclastic (RAW 264.7 differentiated with RANKL) cells. We could demonstrate that the physical properties like the compressive strength of specimens formed with IP6 (brushite_IP6_5 = 11.2 MPa) were improved compared to the reference (brushite = 9.8 MPa). In osteoblast and osteoclast assays, IP6 exhibited significantly better cytocompatibility in terms of cell activity and cell number for brushite cements up to 11 times compared to the brushite reference. In contrast, the calcium-deficient hydroxyapatite (CDHA) cements produced similar results for IP6 (CDHA_IP6_0.25 = 27.0 MPa) when compared to their reference (CDHA = 21.2 MPa). Interestingly, lower doses of IP6 were found to be more effective than higher doses with up to 3 times higher. Additionally, IP6 significantly increased degradation in both passive and active resorption. For these reasons, IP6 is emerging as a strong new competitor to established setting retarders such as citric acid. These cements have potential applications in bone augmentation, the stabilisation of non-load bearing fractures (craniofacial), or the cementation of metal implants.

Graphical Abstract

Abstract Image

植酸改性磷酸钙水泥的生物和机械性能。
磷酸钙水泥(主要是刷石水泥)需要添加缓凝剂,以确保足够的加工时间和可加工性。迄今为止,柠檬酸一直是这方面使用的主要缓凝剂。由于柠檬酸的生物相容性较差,因此探索替代方案以改善加工性能至关重要。近年来,人们对植酸(IP6)这种缓凝剂的研究越来越多。本研究除了研究磷酸钙水泥的物理性质外,还研究了含有不同浓度 IP6 的磷酸钙水泥的生物特性。因此,我们使用成骨细胞(MG-63)和破骨细胞(用 RANKL 分化的 RAW 264.7)进行了体外细胞相容性测试。结果表明,使用 IP6(brushite_IP6_5 = 11.2 兆帕)形成的试样的抗压强度等物理性质比参考值(brushite = 9.8 兆帕)有所提高。在成骨细胞和破骨细胞试验中,就细胞活性和细胞数量而言,IP6 的细胞相容性明显优于 brushite 水泥,最高可达 brushite 参考材料的 11 倍。相比之下,缺钙羟基磷灰石(CDHA)水门汀的 IP6 结果(CDHA_IP6_0.25 = 27.0 MPa)与其参考值(CDHA = 21.2 MPa)相似。有趣的是,较低剂量的 IP6 比高剂量(高达 3 倍)的 IP6 更有效。此外,IP6 还能明显增加被动和主动吸收的降解。由于这些原因,IP6 正在成为柠檬酸等既有凝固延缓剂的有力竞争者。这些水门汀在骨增量、稳定非承重骨折(颅面部)或金属植入物的粘接方面具有潜在的应用价值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine
Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine 工程技术-材料科学:生物材料
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
73
审稿时长
3.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine publishes refereed papers providing significant progress in the application of biomaterials and tissue engineering constructs as medical or dental implants, prostheses and devices. Coverage spans a wide range of topics from basic science to clinical applications, around the theme of materials in medicine and dentistry. The central element is the development of synthetic and natural materials used in orthopaedic, maxillofacial, cardiovascular, neurological, ophthalmic and dental applications. Special biomedical topics include biomaterial synthesis and characterisation, biocompatibility studies, nanomedicine, tissue engineering constructs and cell substrates, regenerative medicine, computer modelling and other advanced experimental methodologies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信