Juri Hoedemakers, Isabel de Bruin Cardoso, Philine van Overbeeke, Lucas Meijs
{"title":"Instead of with a rowboat, search for the north star by navigating a sailboat through turbulent times","authors":"Juri Hoedemakers, Isabel de Bruin Cardoso, Philine van Overbeeke, Lucas Meijs","doi":"10.1002/nvsm.1873","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>We respond to von Schnurbein and Ahmad's (2019) metaphor of rowing to elucidate the inflexibility of foundations. We suggest that perhaps a sailboat would be more appropriate to finding the north star and add a fifth proposition: a participatory decision-making process that includes balanced feedback. This approach, though not new, can pose risks such as misaligned priorities and ineffective decisions. To navigate these challenges, the introduction of a \"court jester\" role is proposed, encouraging open dialogue and critical self-reflection. The flexibility akin to sailing, where adjustments are made based on feedback, is advocated for effective and dynamic foundation governance.</p>","PeriodicalId":100823,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","volume":"29 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Philanthropy and Marketing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/nvsm.1873","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We respond to von Schnurbein and Ahmad's (2019) metaphor of rowing to elucidate the inflexibility of foundations. We suggest that perhaps a sailboat would be more appropriate to finding the north star and add a fifth proposition: a participatory decision-making process that includes balanced feedback. This approach, though not new, can pose risks such as misaligned priorities and ineffective decisions. To navigate these challenges, the introduction of a "court jester" role is proposed, encouraging open dialogue and critical self-reflection. The flexibility akin to sailing, where adjustments are made based on feedback, is advocated for effective and dynamic foundation governance.