Peri-Intubation Push Dose Vasopressors in Critical Care Transport

Q3 Nursing
Alissa M. Bates MD, Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP, Kalle J. Fjeld MD, Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN, Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH
{"title":"Peri-Intubation Push Dose Vasopressors in Critical Care Transport","authors":"Alissa M. Bates MD,&nbsp;Alyson M. Esteves PharmD, BCPS, BCCCP,&nbsp;Kalle J. Fjeld MD,&nbsp;Jeremy M. Singleton RN, CFRN,&nbsp;Matthew A. Roginski MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Push dose vasopressors are administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension in critically ill patients. The benefit of push dose vasopressors over initiation of continuous vasopressor infusions is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe current use of push dose vasopressors in critical care transport.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 by a single critical care transport service who received peri-intubation push dose vasopressors. The primary outcome was incidence of push dose vasopressor administration. The secondary outcome was frequency of initiation or increase in continuous vasopressor infusion after intubation.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Three hundred thirty-four patients were intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean age was 55.8 ± 19.7 years and 28 (57.1%) were male. Forty-five (91.8%) were transported via rotor wing aircraft. Twenty-three (46.9%) were scene transports. The most common indication for intubation was trauma (n=30, 61.2%). The mean pre-intubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Forty-eight (97.9%) received push dose vasopressors prior to intubation and 36 (73.4%) received push doses post intubation. Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion post-intubation.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Push dose vasopressors were utilized in a heterogeneous manner in the peri-intubation period. It remains unclear which patients may benefit from initiation of continuous vasopressor infusion rather than push dose vasopressors. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of push dose and continuous vasopressors in the peri-intubation period.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 367"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001184","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Push dose vasopressors are administered to attenuate peri-intubation hypotension in critically ill patients. The benefit of push dose vasopressors over initiation of continuous vasopressor infusions is unclear. The aim of this study was to describe current use of push dose vasopressors in critical care transport.

Methods

This was a retrospective chart review of adult patients (≥18 years) intubated between January 2017 and May 2023 by a single critical care transport service who received peri-intubation push dose vasopressors. The primary outcome was incidence of push dose vasopressor administration. The secondary outcome was frequency of initiation or increase in continuous vasopressor infusion after intubation.

Results

Three hundred thirty-four patients were intubated during this period, 49 (14.7%) received push dose vasopressors in the peri-intubation period. The mean age was 55.8 ± 19.7 years and 28 (57.1%) were male. Forty-five (91.8%) were transported via rotor wing aircraft. Twenty-three (46.9%) were scene transports. The most common indication for intubation was trauma (n=30, 61.2%). The mean pre-intubation shock index was 1.1 ± 0.5. Of those who received push dose vasopressors, 34 (69.4%) received multiple push doses; the mean number of administrations was 2.5 ± 1.9. Forty-eight (97.9%) received push dose vasopressors prior to intubation and 36 (73.4%) received push doses post intubation. Fifteen (30.6%) were started on a continuous vasopressor infusion and 3 (11.1%) had an increase in an existing infusion post-intubation.

Conclusion

Push dose vasopressors were utilized in a heterogeneous manner in the peri-intubation period. It remains unclear which patients may benefit from initiation of continuous vasopressor infusion rather than push dose vasopressors. Further investigation is required to better elucidate the role of push dose and continuous vasopressors in the peri-intubation period.

重症监护转运过程中的插管前推注剂量血管加压药
导言:推注式血管加压素可减轻重症患者插管周围的低血压。目前尚不清楚推注剂量血管加压素比持续输注血管加压素的益处。本研究旨在描述目前在重症监护转运中使用推注剂量血管加压素的情况。方法这是一项回顾性病历审查,审查对象为2017年1月至2023年5月期间在单一重症监护转运服务机构接受插管周围推注剂量血管加压素治疗的成年患者(≥18岁)。主要结果是推注剂量血管加压素的发生率。结果334名患者在此期间接受了插管,49人(14.7%)在插管前接受了推注剂量的血管加压药。平均年龄为 55.8 ± 19.7 岁,男性 28 人(57.1%)。45人(91.8%)通过旋翼飞机转运。23例(46.9%)为现场转运。最常见的插管指征是外伤(30 人,61.2%)。插管前的平均休克指数为 1.1 ± 0.5。在接受推注剂量血管加压剂的患者中,有 34 人(69.4%)接受了多次推注;平均推注次数为 2.5 ± 1.9。48人(97.9%)在插管前接受了推注剂量的血管加压剂,36人(73.4%)在插管后接受了推注剂量的血管加压剂。15人(30.6%)开始持续输注血管加压素,3人(11.1%)在插管后增加了现有的输注量。目前仍不清楚哪些患者可以从持续输注血管加压药而非推注剂量血管加压药中获益。要更好地阐明推注式和持续式血管加压药在插管围手术期的作用,还需要进一步的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信