GAMUT Metric Implementation Improves Ventilator Documentation and Management Practices

Q3 Nursing
Kellan Doberstein, Dr. Andrew Cathers, Dr. Craig Tschautscher, Dr. Ryan Newberry, Dr. Brittney Bernardoni
{"title":"GAMUT Metric Implementation Improves Ventilator Documentation and Management Practices","authors":"Kellan Doberstein,&nbsp;Dr. Andrew Cathers,&nbsp;Dr. Craig Tschautscher,&nbsp;Dr. Ryan Newberry,&nbsp;Dr. Brittney Bernardoni","doi":"10.1016/j.amj.2024.05.019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>It is well established that lung-protective ventilation strategies are imperative for reducing patient morbidity and mortality. Recognizing the importance of early lung-protective ventilation in the pre-hospital setting, the Ground and Air Medical qUality Transport (GAMUT) Quality Improvement Collaborative recently established a metric that aims to keep plateau pressure &lt; 30 mmHg. GAMUT develops and tracks transport-specific quality metrics used by both domestic and international critical care transport (CCT) programs. The impact of GAMUT metric implementation on documentation practices and patient care in a CCT program remains unanswered.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>To determine if incorporation of the GAMUT metric, plateau pressure &lt; 30 mmHg, changed the incidence of plateau pressure documentation or lung-protective ventilation.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This was a single center, retrospective cohort study of endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients transported by a university affiliated, physician/nurse-staffed CCT program between August 2021 and October 2022. Patients mechanically ventilated via an extraglottic airway and those under the age of 18 were excluded. Pre-GAMUT data was collected from August 2021 to January 2022 and post-GAMUT implementation data from May 2022 to October 2022. February 2022 to April 2022 was excluded from analysis as this was the initial education and implementation period. Data was extracted from the transport service chart by a trained data abstractor and recorded in an external database (REDCap). Statistical analysis was performed using a Pearson chi square for categorical variables and a two-sample t-test for continuous variables.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Before implementation of the GAMUT metric, plateau pressure was documented in 11.8% of charts (n=22/187) compared to 69.4% (n=109/157) in post GAMUT charts (p &lt; 0.0125). There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients ventilated with both plateau pressure &lt; 30 mmHg and driving pressure &lt; 15 mmHg post GAMUT metric implementation (p &lt; 0.0125 for both).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Our findings indicate that GAMUT metric implementation not only improved documentation of plateau pressure by nearly 6-fold, but also significantly increased the proportion of patients transported with lung-protective ventilation as evidenced by both lower plateau and driving pressures. Implementation of a GAMUT metric appears to improve both documentation practices and quality of patient care.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35737,"journal":{"name":"Air Medical Journal","volume":"43 4","pages":"Page 366"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Air Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1067991X24001160","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Nursing","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

It is well established that lung-protective ventilation strategies are imperative for reducing patient morbidity and mortality. Recognizing the importance of early lung-protective ventilation in the pre-hospital setting, the Ground and Air Medical qUality Transport (GAMUT) Quality Improvement Collaborative recently established a metric that aims to keep plateau pressure < 30 mmHg. GAMUT develops and tracks transport-specific quality metrics used by both domestic and international critical care transport (CCT) programs. The impact of GAMUT metric implementation on documentation practices and patient care in a CCT program remains unanswered.

Objectives

To determine if incorporation of the GAMUT metric, plateau pressure < 30 mmHg, changed the incidence of plateau pressure documentation or lung-protective ventilation.

Methods

This was a single center, retrospective cohort study of endotracheally intubated and mechanically ventilated adult patients transported by a university affiliated, physician/nurse-staffed CCT program between August 2021 and October 2022. Patients mechanically ventilated via an extraglottic airway and those under the age of 18 were excluded. Pre-GAMUT data was collected from August 2021 to January 2022 and post-GAMUT implementation data from May 2022 to October 2022. February 2022 to April 2022 was excluded from analysis as this was the initial education and implementation period. Data was extracted from the transport service chart by a trained data abstractor and recorded in an external database (REDCap). Statistical analysis was performed using a Pearson chi square for categorical variables and a two-sample t-test for continuous variables.

Results

Before implementation of the GAMUT metric, plateau pressure was documented in 11.8% of charts (n=22/187) compared to 69.4% (n=109/157) in post GAMUT charts (p < 0.0125). There was a statistically significant increase in the proportion of patients ventilated with both plateau pressure < 30 mmHg and driving pressure < 15 mmHg post GAMUT metric implementation (p < 0.0125 for both).

Conclusions

Our findings indicate that GAMUT metric implementation not only improved documentation of plateau pressure by nearly 6-fold, but also significantly increased the proportion of patients transported with lung-protective ventilation as evidenced by both lower plateau and driving pressures. Implementation of a GAMUT metric appears to improve both documentation practices and quality of patient care.

GAMUT 指标的实施改进了呼吸机文档和管理实践
背景众所周知,肺保护性通气策略对于降低患者发病率和死亡率至关重要。认识到院前早期肺保护性通气的重要性,地面和空中医疗质量转运(GAMUT)质量改进合作组织最近制定了一项指标,旨在将高原压保持在 30 mmHg。GAMUT 制定并跟踪国内和国际重症监护转运 (CCT) 计划使用的特定转运质量指标。目标确定 GAMUT 指标(高原压 < 30 mmHg)的纳入是否改变了高原压记录或肺保护性通气的发生率。方法这是一项单中心、回顾性队列研究,研究对象为 2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 10 月间由大学附属、医生/护士参与的 CCT 项目转运的气管插管和机械通气成人患者。不包括通过声门外气道进行机械通气的患者和未满 18 岁的患者。2021 年 8 月至 2022 年 1 月收集了 GAMUT 实施前的数据,2022 年 5 月至 2022 年 10 月收集了 GAMUT 实施后的数据。由于 2022 年 2 月至 2022 年 4 月是教育和实施的初始阶段,因此不在分析之列。数据由经过培训的数据抽取员从运输服务图表中提取,并记录在外部数据库(REDCap)中。结果在实施 GAMUT 指标前,11.8% 的病历(n=22/187)记录有高原压,而在实施 GAMUT 后,69.4% 的病历(n=109/157)记录有高原压(p <0.0125)。结论我们的研究结果表明,GAMUT 标准的实施不仅将高原压的记录提高了近 6 倍,而且还显著提高了肺保护性通气患者的转运比例,这体现在较低的高原压和驱动压上。GAMUT 指标的实施似乎同时改善了记录方法和患者护理质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Air Medical Journal
Air Medical Journal Nursing-Emergency Nursing
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
112
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Air Medical Journal is the official journal of the five leading air medical transport associations in the United States. AMJ is the premier provider of information for the medical transport industry, addressing the unique concerns of medical transport physicians, nurses, pilots, paramedics, emergency medical technicians, communication specialists, and program administrators. The journal contains practical how-to articles, debates on controversial industry issues, legislative updates, case studies, and peer-reviewed original research articles covering all aspects of the medical transport profession.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信