Dynamics and microbial characteristics of nitrogen and carbon in saline-alkali paddy soil under different fertilization

Xinyi Wang , Baixing Yan , Brian Shutes , Mingming Wang , Hui Zhu
{"title":"Dynamics and microbial characteristics of nitrogen and carbon in saline-alkali paddy soil under different fertilization","authors":"Xinyi Wang ,&nbsp;Baixing Yan ,&nbsp;Brian Shutes ,&nbsp;Mingming Wang ,&nbsp;Hui Zhu","doi":"10.1016/j.wsee.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The expansion of saline-alkali paddy fields, coupled with the application of large amounts of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, has given rise to a host of environmental concerns. While N and carbon (C) are vital indicators for assessing soil fertility, their dynamic characteristics in saline-alkali paddy soil remain obscure. To address this knowledge gap, we established paddy mesocosms with five distinct N-fertilizer treatments: control without N-fertilizer (CK), urea (U), urea with inhibitors (UI), organic–inorganic compound fertilizer (OCF) and C-based slow-release fertilizer (CSF). The objective was to monitor the dynamic changes of various N and soil organic-C (SOC) during a 137-day rice growing season, and to clarify the microbiological characteristics. By the end of the rice growing season, soil ammonia-N (NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N) concentrations were UI &gt; OCF &gt; CSF &gt; U &gt; CK, and UI had a significant difference (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) with all the other four treatments. Soil nitrate-N (NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N) concentrations in OCF and CSF treatments were 5.64 ± 1.25 mg kg<sup>−1</sup> and 6.81 ± 0.29 mg kg<sup>−1</sup>, respectively, significantly (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) higher than U and UI treatments. NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N showed a negative correlation with NO<sub>3</sub><sup>−</sup>-N regardless of the N-fertilizer types, and a significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) positive relationship with alkali-hydrolyzable N (AHN). A significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01) positive relationship existed between total-N (TN) and Bacteria 16S rRNA gene. The SOC had a significant (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.05) positive relationship with <em>mcr</em>A gene. During the entire rice growing season, CSF treatment had lower mean TN and SOC concentrations than all the other treatments, and exhibited the highest TN and total organic-C (TOC) content in rice. In summary, the UI can increase the residual NH<sub>4</sub><sup>+</sup>-N in saline-alkali paddy fields, and the CSF is a better choice for growing rice.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101280,"journal":{"name":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","volume":"6 ","pages":"Pages 95-104"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000081/pdfft?md5=efa46b5b0c95d161794a803f2617d3a0&pid=1-s2.0-S2589471424000081-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Watershed Ecology and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589471424000081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The expansion of saline-alkali paddy fields, coupled with the application of large amounts of nitrogen (N) fertilizers, has given rise to a host of environmental concerns. While N and carbon (C) are vital indicators for assessing soil fertility, their dynamic characteristics in saline-alkali paddy soil remain obscure. To address this knowledge gap, we established paddy mesocosms with five distinct N-fertilizer treatments: control without N-fertilizer (CK), urea (U), urea with inhibitors (UI), organic–inorganic compound fertilizer (OCF) and C-based slow-release fertilizer (CSF). The objective was to monitor the dynamic changes of various N and soil organic-C (SOC) during a 137-day rice growing season, and to clarify the microbiological characteristics. By the end of the rice growing season, soil ammonia-N (NH4+-N) concentrations were UI > OCF > CSF > U > CK, and UI had a significant difference (p < 0.05) with all the other four treatments. Soil nitrate-N (NO3-N) concentrations in OCF and CSF treatments were 5.64 ± 1.25 mg kg−1 and 6.81 ± 0.29 mg kg−1, respectively, significantly (p < 0.05) higher than U and UI treatments. NH4+-N showed a negative correlation with NO3-N regardless of the N-fertilizer types, and a significant (p < 0.01) positive relationship with alkali-hydrolyzable N (AHN). A significant (p < 0.01) positive relationship existed between total-N (TN) and Bacteria 16S rRNA gene. The SOC had a significant (p < 0.05) positive relationship with mcrA gene. During the entire rice growing season, CSF treatment had lower mean TN and SOC concentrations than all the other treatments, and exhibited the highest TN and total organic-C (TOC) content in rice. In summary, the UI can increase the residual NH4+-N in saline-alkali paddy fields, and the CSF is a better choice for growing rice.

Abstract Image

不同施肥条件下盐碱水稻土中氮和碳的动态及微生物特征
盐碱水田的扩大以及大量氮肥的施用引发了一系列环境问题。氮(N)和碳(C)是评估土壤肥力的重要指标,但它们在盐碱水稻田土壤中的动态特征仍然模糊不清。为了填补这一知识空白,我们在水稻中型模拟实验中采用了五种不同的氮肥处理方法:不施氮肥的对照组(CK)、尿素(U)、含抑制剂的尿素(UI)、有机-无机复混肥(OCF)和以碳为基础的缓释肥料(CSF)。目的是监测水稻生长季 137 天期间各种氮和土壤有机碳(SOC)的动态变化,并阐明微生物特征。水稻生长季结束时,土壤氨氮(NH4+-N)浓度分别为 UI > OCF > CSF > U > CK,UI 与其他四个处理相比差异显著(p <0.05)。OCF 和 CSF 处理的土壤硝酸盐-N(NO3--N)浓度分别为 5.64 ± 1.25 mg kg-1 和 6.81 ± 0.29 mg kg-1,明显高于 U 和 UI 处理(p < 0.05)。无论采用哪种氮肥,NH4+-N 都与 NO3-N 呈负相关,与碱解氮 (AHN) 呈显著的正相关(p < 0.01)。总氮(TN)与细菌 16S rRNA 基因之间存在明显的正相关关系(p < 0.01)。SOC 与 mcrA 基因呈显著正相关(p < 0.05)。在整个水稻生长季中,CSF 处理的 TN 和 SOC 平均浓度低于其他所有处理,并且在水稻中表现出最高的 TN 和总有机碳(TOC)含量。总之,UI 能增加盐碱地稻田中残留的 NH4+-N ,而 CSF 是种植水稻的更好选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信