Decarbonization pathways in Brazilian maritime cabotage: A comparative analysis of very low sulfur fuel oil, marine diesel oil, and hydrogenated vegetable oil in carbon dioxide equivalent emissions

Gustavo Adolfo Alves da Costa , André Bergsten Mendes , Vanina Macowski Durski Silva
{"title":"Decarbonization pathways in Brazilian maritime cabotage: A comparative analysis of very low sulfur fuel oil, marine diesel oil, and hydrogenated vegetable oil in carbon dioxide equivalent emissions","authors":"Gustavo Adolfo Alves da Costa ,&nbsp;André Bergsten Mendes ,&nbsp;Vanina Macowski Durski Silva","doi":"10.1016/j.latran.2024.100018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study evaluates the decarbonization potential within Brazilian maritime cabotage by comparing carbon dioxide equivalent emissions from conventional fuels - specifically, Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil and Marine Diesel Oil - with those from Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil. Utilizing a life cycle assessment approach alongside a mathematical model based on operational schedules from four leading Brazilian maritime cabotage companies in the container sector, this research quantifies the environmental benefits of switching fuels. The results demonstrate that transitioning to Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil could significantly reduce annual emissions, from 1395,466 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent to 343,950 tons, amounting to a 75.4 % decrease. This noticeable decrease underscores the critical importance and viability of incorporating hydrogenated vegetable oil into the maritime sector's fuel mix as part of Brazil's broader decarbonization strategy. This research highlights the need for strategic policy reforms and strengthened collaboration across sectors to advance Brazil's maritime sustainability efforts.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100868,"journal":{"name":"Latin American Transport Studies","volume":"2 ","pages":"Article 100018"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950024924000106/pdfft?md5=2babf6db5a34a83530d3bc8465c15905&pid=1-s2.0-S2950024924000106-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin American Transport Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950024924000106","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study evaluates the decarbonization potential within Brazilian maritime cabotage by comparing carbon dioxide equivalent emissions from conventional fuels - specifically, Very Low Sulfur Fuel Oil and Marine Diesel Oil - with those from Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil. Utilizing a life cycle assessment approach alongside a mathematical model based on operational schedules from four leading Brazilian maritime cabotage companies in the container sector, this research quantifies the environmental benefits of switching fuels. The results demonstrate that transitioning to Hydrogenated Vegetable Oil could significantly reduce annual emissions, from 1395,466 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent to 343,950 tons, amounting to a 75.4 % decrease. This noticeable decrease underscores the critical importance and viability of incorporating hydrogenated vegetable oil into the maritime sector's fuel mix as part of Brazil's broader decarbonization strategy. This research highlights the need for strategic policy reforms and strengthened collaboration across sectors to advance Brazil's maritime sustainability efforts.

巴西海运业的去碳化途径:超低硫燃油、船用柴油和氢化植物油二氧化碳排放当量比较分析
本研究通过比较传统燃料(特别是超低硫燃料油和船用柴油)和氢化植物油的二氧化碳排放当量,评估了巴西海运业的脱碳潜力。这项研究利用生命周期评估方法和数学模型,以巴西四家领先的集装箱海运公司的运营时间表为基础,量化了燃料转换的环境效益。结果表明,过渡到氢化植物油可显著减少年排放量,从 1395,466 吨二氧化碳当量降至 343,950 吨,降幅达 75.4%。这一明显的减少突出了将氢化植物油纳入海运部门燃料组合的重要性和可行性,这也是巴西更广泛的去碳化战略的一部分。这项研究强调了进行战略性政策改革和加强跨部门合作的必要性,以推进巴西海事可持续发展的努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信