Microvascular Decompression Using the Gelatin Sponge Insertion Technique for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Operative Neurosurgery Pub Date : 2025-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1227/ons.0000000000001229
Zhongding Zhang, Hua Zhao, Yinda Tang, Baimiao Wang, Qing Yuan, Haopeng Wang, Xiaomin Cai, Wanchun Zhu, Shiting Li
{"title":"Microvascular Decompression Using the Gelatin Sponge Insertion Technique for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Retrospective Cohort Study.","authors":"Zhongding Zhang, Hua Zhao, Yinda Tang, Baimiao Wang, Qing Yuan, Haopeng Wang, Xiaomin Cai, Wanchun Zhu, Shiting Li","doi":"10.1227/ons.0000000000001229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the primary surgical intervention for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), with Teflon being the most conventional decompressing material. However, Teflon has been associated with adhesion and granulomas after MVD, which closely correlated with the recurrence of TN. Therefore, we developed a new technique to prevent direct contact between Teflon and nerve. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of MVD using the gelatin sponge (GS) insertion technique with that of Teflon inserted alone in treating primary TN.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and the follow-up data of 734 patients with unilateral primary TN who underwent MVD at our center from January 2014 to December 2019. After exclusions, we identified 313 cases of GS-inserted MVD and 347 cases of traditional MVD. The follow-up exceeded 3 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The operating time of the GS-inserted group was longer than that of the Teflon group (109.38 ± 14.77 vs 103.53 ± 16.02 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference between 2 groups in immediate surgical outcomes and postoperative complications. The yearly recurrence rate for GS-inserted MVD was lower at first (1.0%), second (1.2%), and third (1.2%) years after surgery, compared with its counterpart of Teflon group (3.7%, 2.9%, and 1.7% respectively). The first-year recurrence rate ( P = .031) and total recurrence rate in 3 years ( P = .013) was significantly lower in the GS-inserted group than Teflon group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated better outcomes in GS-inserted MVD groups ( P = .020).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The application of the GS insertion technique in MVD reduced first-year postoperative recurrence of TN, with similar complications rates compared with traditional MVD.</p>","PeriodicalId":54254,"journal":{"name":"Operative Neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"52-58"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operative Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1227/ons.0000000000001229","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Microvascular decompression (MVD) is the primary surgical intervention for trigeminal neuralgia (TN), with Teflon being the most conventional decompressing material. However, Teflon has been associated with adhesion and granulomas after MVD, which closely correlated with the recurrence of TN. Therefore, we developed a new technique to prevent direct contact between Teflon and nerve. The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of MVD using the gelatin sponge (GS) insertion technique with that of Teflon inserted alone in treating primary TN.

Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the medical records and the follow-up data of 734 patients with unilateral primary TN who underwent MVD at our center from January 2014 to December 2019. After exclusions, we identified 313 cases of GS-inserted MVD and 347 cases of traditional MVD. The follow-up exceeded 3 years.

Results: The operating time of the GS-inserted group was longer than that of the Teflon group (109.38 ± 14.77 vs 103.53 ± 16.02 minutes, P < .001). There was no difference between 2 groups in immediate surgical outcomes and postoperative complications. The yearly recurrence rate for GS-inserted MVD was lower at first (1.0%), second (1.2%), and third (1.2%) years after surgery, compared with its counterpart of Teflon group (3.7%, 2.9%, and 1.7% respectively). The first-year recurrence rate ( P = .031) and total recurrence rate in 3 years ( P = .013) was significantly lower in the GS-inserted group than Teflon group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated better outcomes in GS-inserted MVD groups ( P = .020).

Conclusion: The application of the GS insertion technique in MVD reduced first-year postoperative recurrence of TN, with similar complications rates compared with traditional MVD.

使用明胶海绵插入技术对三叉神经痛进行微血管减压:回顾性队列研究
背景和目的:微血管减压术(MVD)是治疗三叉神经痛(TN)的主要手术疗法,特氟隆是最传统的减压材料。然而,特氟隆与 MVD 后的粘连和肉芽肿有关,这与 TN 的复发密切相关。因此,我们开发了一种新技术,防止特氟龙与神经直接接触。本研究的目的是比较使用明胶海绵(GS)插入技术与单独插入特氟龙治疗原发性 TN 的疗效:我们回顾性分析了2014年1月至2019年12月在本中心接受MVD治疗的734例单侧原发性TN患者的病历和随访数据。排除后,我们确定了313例GS插入式MVD和347例传统MVD。随访时间超过3年:结果:GS-插入组的手术时间长于特氟隆组(109.38 ± 14.77 vs 103.53 ± 16.02 分钟,P < .001)。两组在即时手术效果和术后并发症方面没有差异。与特氟隆组(分别为 3.7%、2.9% 和 1.7%)相比,GS-插入式 MVD 在术后第一年(1.0%)、第二年(1.2%)和第三年(1.2%)的年复发率较低。GS植入组的第一年复发率(P = 0.031)和三年总复发率(P = 0.013)明显低于特氟隆植入组。Kaplan-Meier生存分析表明,插入GS的MVD组疗效更好(P = .020):结论:在MVD中应用GS插入技术降低了TN的术后第一年复发率,并发症发生率与传统MVD相似。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Operative Neurosurgery
Operative Neurosurgery Medicine-Neurology (clinical)
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
530
期刊介绍: Operative Neurosurgery is a bi-monthly, unique publication focusing exclusively on surgical technique and devices, providing practical, skill-enhancing guidance to its readers. Complementing the clinical and research studies published in Neurosurgery, Operative Neurosurgery brings the reader technical material that highlights operative procedures, anatomy, instrumentation, devices, and technology. Operative Neurosurgery is the practical resource for cutting-edge material that brings the surgeon the most up to date literature on operative practice and technique
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信