Karlin E. Rufenacht, Alexa J. Asson, Kawsar Hossain, Stephen W. Santoro
{"title":"The influence of olfactory experience on the birthrates of olfactory sensory neurons with specific odorant receptor identities","authors":"Karlin E. Rufenacht, Alexa J. Asson, Kawsar Hossain, Stephen W. Santoro","doi":"10.1002/dvg.23611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) are one of a few neuron types that are generated continuously throughout life in mammals. The persistence of olfactory sensory neurogenesis beyond early development has long been thought to function simply to replace neurons that are lost or damaged through exposure to environmental insults. The possibility that olfactory sensory neurogenesis may also serve an adaptive function has received relatively little consideration, largely due to the assumption that the generation of new OSNs is stochastic with respect to OSN subtype, as defined by the single odorant receptor gene that each neural precursor stochastically chooses for expression out of hundreds of possibilities. Accordingly, the relative birthrates of different OSN subtypes are predicted to be constant and impervious to olfactory experience. This assumption has been called into question, however, by evidence that the birthrates of specific OSN subtypes can be selectively altered by manipulating olfactory experience through olfactory deprivation, enrichment, and conditioning paradigms. Moreover, studies of recovery of the OSN population following injury provide further evidence that olfactory sensory neurogenesis may not be strictly stochastic with respect to subtype. Here we review this evidence and consider mechanistic and functional implications of the prospect that specific olfactory experiences can regulate olfactory sensory neurogenesis rates in a subtype-selective manner.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":12718,"journal":{"name":"genesis","volume":"62 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"genesis","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/dvg.23611","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENTAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) are one of a few neuron types that are generated continuously throughout life in mammals. The persistence of olfactory sensory neurogenesis beyond early development has long been thought to function simply to replace neurons that are lost or damaged through exposure to environmental insults. The possibility that olfactory sensory neurogenesis may also serve an adaptive function has received relatively little consideration, largely due to the assumption that the generation of new OSNs is stochastic with respect to OSN subtype, as defined by the single odorant receptor gene that each neural precursor stochastically chooses for expression out of hundreds of possibilities. Accordingly, the relative birthrates of different OSN subtypes are predicted to be constant and impervious to olfactory experience. This assumption has been called into question, however, by evidence that the birthrates of specific OSN subtypes can be selectively altered by manipulating olfactory experience through olfactory deprivation, enrichment, and conditioning paradigms. Moreover, studies of recovery of the OSN population following injury provide further evidence that olfactory sensory neurogenesis may not be strictly stochastic with respect to subtype. Here we review this evidence and consider mechanistic and functional implications of the prospect that specific olfactory experiences can regulate olfactory sensory neurogenesis rates in a subtype-selective manner.
嗅觉神经元(OSN)是哺乳动物一生中持续生成的少数神经元类型之一。长期以来,人们一直认为嗅觉神经元在早期发育之后仍能持续生成,其功能仅仅是替代因暴露于环境中而丢失或受损的神经元。嗅觉神经发生也可能具有适应功能,但这种可能性相对较少被考虑,这主要是由于人们假设新的嗅觉神经元的产生与嗅觉神经元亚型有关,是随机的,这是由每个神经前体从数百种可能性中随机选择表达的单一气味受体基因所定义的。因此,不同 OSN 亚型的相对出生率被认为是恒定的,不受嗅觉经验的影响。然而,有证据表明,特定 OSN 亚型的出生率可以通过嗅觉剥夺、富集和条件反射等范式操纵嗅觉体验,从而有选择性地改变,这就对上述假设提出了质疑。此外,对受伤后 OSN 群体恢复的研究也进一步证明,嗅觉神经发生在亚型方面可能不是严格随机的。在此,我们回顾了这些证据,并考虑了特定嗅觉体验能以亚型选择性方式调节嗅觉神经发生率这一前景的机理和功能意义。
期刊介绍:
As of January 2000, Developmental Genetics was renamed and relaunched as genesis: The Journal of Genetics and Development, with a new scope and Editorial Board. The journal focuses on work that addresses the genetics of development and the fundamental mechanisms of embryological processes in animals and plants. With increased awareness of the interplay between genetics and evolutionary change, particularly during developmental processes, we encourage submission of manuscripts from all ecological niches. The expanded numbers of genomes for which sequencing is being completed will facilitate genetic and genomic examination of developmental issues, even if the model system does not fit the “classical genetic” mold. Therefore, we encourage submission of manuscripts from all species. Other areas of particular interest include: 1) the roles of epigenetics, microRNAs and environment on developmental processes; 2) genome-wide studies; 3) novel imaging techniques for the study of gene expression and cellular function; 4) comparative genetics and genomics and 5) animal models of human genetic and developmental disorders.
genesis presents reviews, full research articles, short research letters, and state-of-the-art technology reports that promote an understanding of the function of genes and the roles they play in complex developmental processes.