II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RHEUMATOLOGY
Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Luciana Parente Costa Seguro, Emília Inoue Sato, Eduardo Ferreira Borba, Evandro Mendes Klumb, Lilian Tereza Lavras Costallat, Marta Maria das Chagas Medeiros, Eloisa Bonfá, Nafice Costa Araújo, Simone Appenzeller, Ana Carolina de Oliveira E Silva Montandon, Emily Figueiredo Neves Yuki, Roberto Cordeiro de Andrade Teixeira, Rosa Weiss Telles, Danielle Christinne Soares do Egypto, Francinne Machado Ribeiro, Andrese Aline Gasparin, Antonio Silaide de Araujo Junior, Cláudia Lopes Santoro Neiva, Debora Cerqueira Calderaro, Odirlei Andre Monticielo
{"title":"II Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for lupus nephritis diagnosis and treatment.","authors":"Edgard Torres Dos Reis-Neto, Luciana Parente Costa Seguro, Emília Inoue Sato, Eduardo Ferreira Borba, Evandro Mendes Klumb, Lilian Tereza Lavras Costallat, Marta Maria das Chagas Medeiros, Eloisa Bonfá, Nafice Costa Araújo, Simone Appenzeller, Ana Carolina de Oliveira E Silva Montandon, Emily Figueiredo Neves Yuki, Roberto Cordeiro de Andrade Teixeira, Rosa Weiss Telles, Danielle Christinne Soares do Egypto, Francinne Machado Ribeiro, Andrese Aline Gasparin, Antonio Silaide de Araujo Junior, Cláudia Lopes Santoro Neiva, Debora Cerqueira Calderaro, Odirlei Andre Monticielo","doi":"10.1186/s42358-024-00386-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.</p>","PeriodicalId":48634,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s42358-024-00386-8","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To develop the second evidence-based Brazilian Society of Rheumatology consensus for diagnosis and treatment of lupus nephritis (LN).

Methods: Two methodologists and 20 rheumatologists from Lupus Comittee of Brazilian Society of Rheumatology participate in the development of this guideline. Fourteen PICO questions were defined and a systematic review was performed. Eligible randomized controlled trials were analyzed regarding complete renal remission, partial renal remission, serum creatinine, proteinuria, serum creatinine doubling, progression to end-stage renal disease, renal relapse, and severe adverse events (infections and mortality). The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to develop these recommendations. Recommendations required ≥82% of agreement among the voting members and were classified as strongly in favor, weakly in favor, conditional, weakly against or strongly against a particular intervention. Other aspects of LN management (diagnosis, general principles of treatment, treatment of comorbidities and refractory cases) were evaluated through literature review and expert opinion.

Results: All SLE patients should undergo creatinine and urinalysis tests to assess renal involvement. Kidney biopsy is considered the gold standard for diagnosing LN but, if it is not available or there is a contraindication to the procedure, therapeutic decisions should be based on clinical and laboratory parameters. Fourteen recommendations were developed. Target Renal response (TRR) was defined as improvement or maintenance of renal function (±10% at baseline of treatment) combined with a decrease in 24-h proteinuria or 24-h UPCR of 25% at 3 months, a decrease of 50% at 6 months, and proteinuria < 0.8 g/24 h at 12 months. Hydroxychloroquine should be prescribed to all SLE patients, except in cases of contraindication. Glucocorticoids should be used at the lowest dose and for the minimal necessary period. In class III or IV (±V), mycophenolate (MMF), cyclophosphamide, MMF plus tacrolimus (TAC), MMF plus belimumab or TAC can be used as induction therapy. For maintenance therapy, MMF or azathioprine (AZA) are the first choice and TAC or cyclosporin or leflunomide can be used in patients who cannot use MMF or AZA. Rituximab can be prescribed in cases of refractory disease. In cases of failure in achieving TRR, it is important to assess adherence, immunosuppressant dosage, adjuvant therapy, comorbidities, and consider biopsy/rebiopsy.

Conclusion: This consensus provides evidence-based data to guide LN diagnosis and treatment, supporting the development of public and supplementary health policies in Brazil.

第二届巴西风湿病学会狼疮肾炎诊断和治疗共识。
目的制定第二份巴西风湿病学会狼疮肾炎(LN)诊断和治疗循证共识:巴西风湿病学会狼疮委员会的两名方法学专家和 20 名风湿病学家参与了该指南的制定。确定了 14 个 PICO 问题,并进行了系统回顾。对符合条件的随机对照试验进行了分析,内容涉及完全肾功能缓解、部分肾功能缓解、血清肌酐、蛋白尿、血清肌酐倍增、进展至终末期肾病、肾病复发以及严重不良事件(感染和死亡)。在制定这些建议时采用了建议评估、发展和评价分级法(GRADE)。建议要求投票成员的同意率≥82%,并分为强烈支持、微弱支持、有条件支持、微弱反对或强烈反对特定干预措施。LN管理的其他方面(诊断、治疗的一般原则、合并症和难治性病例的治疗)则通过文献回顾和专家意见进行评估:所有系统性红斑狼疮患者都应接受肌酐和尿液分析检查,以评估肾脏受累情况。肾活检被认为是诊断LN的金标准,但如果无法进行肾活检或有禁忌症,则应根据临床和实验室指标做出治疗决定。共制定了 14 项建议。目标肾功能反应(TRR)定义为肾功能改善或维持(治疗基线为±10%),同时 24 小时蛋白尿或 24 小时 UPCR 在 3 个月时下降 25%,在 6 个月时下降 50%,蛋白尿 结论:该共识为指导 LN 诊断和治疗提供了循证数据,为巴西公共和辅助医疗政策的制定提供了支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Advances in Rheumatology
Advances in Rheumatology Medicine-Rheumatology
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
41
审稿时长
53 weeks
期刊介绍: Formerly named Revista Brasileira de Reumatologia, the journal is celebrating its 60th year of publication. Advances in Rheumatology is an international, open access journal publishing pre-clinical, translational and clinical studies on all aspects of paediatric and adult rheumatic diseases, including degenerative, inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. The journal is the official publication of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology and welcomes original research (including systematic reviews and meta-analyses), literature reviews, guidelines and letters arising from published material.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信