Tranexamic Acid in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Future Directions.

IF 1.7 Q2 SURGERY
JBJS Reviews Pub Date : 2024-06-18 eCollection Date: 2024-06-01 DOI:10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00035
Dev Laungani, Joshua R Porto, Lucas Haase, Kira Smith, Raymond Chen, Robert Gillespie
{"title":"Tranexamic Acid in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Scoping Review of Current Practices and Future Directions.","authors":"Dev Laungani, Joshua R Porto, Lucas Haase, Kira Smith, Raymond Chen, Robert Gillespie","doi":"10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) as an antifibrinolytic agent in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is well documented; however, there remains considerable practice variability concerning the optimal route of administration and dosing protocols concerning the medication's use. Our aim was to conduct a scoping review of the literature regarding the efficacy of various methods of TXA administration in TSA and to identify knowledge gaps that may be addressed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The PubMed and MEDLINE electronic databases were searched to identify all articles published before March 2023 investigating the administration of TXA in TSA. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included, and data were extracted to capture information regarding intervention details and related outcomes such as blood loss, transfusion needs, and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 15 studies were included in this review. All selected studies used either intravenous (IV) or topical TXA, with 1 study also including a combined approach of both topical and IV TXA. Of the studies that used an IV approach, the most commonly reported favorable outcomes were a reduction in blood volume loss, reduction in hemoglobin or hematocrit change, and decreased drain output. Dosing varied significantly between all identified studies because some used a standard dosing amount in grams or milligrams for all treatment group participants, whereas others used weight-based dosing amounts. All studies that used a weight-based dosing regimen as well as studies using a standard dosing amount between 1,000 and 5,000 mg reported favorable outcomes for postoperative blood loss.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Both IV and topical TXA clearly demonstrate favorable perioperative hematologic profiles in TSA. Although both approaches have demonstrated a successful association with decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements, there is no definitive benefit to choosing one over the other. Furthermore, the use of oral TXA either in combination or isolation warrants further study in TSA because of its comparable efficacy profiles and significantly lower associated costs of application.</p>","PeriodicalId":47098,"journal":{"name":"JBJS Reviews","volume":"12 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JBJS Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.RVW.24.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) as an antifibrinolytic agent in total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) is well documented; however, there remains considerable practice variability concerning the optimal route of administration and dosing protocols concerning the medication's use. Our aim was to conduct a scoping review of the literature regarding the efficacy of various methods of TXA administration in TSA and to identify knowledge gaps that may be addressed.

Methods: A scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. The PubMed and MEDLINE electronic databases were searched to identify all articles published before March 2023 investigating the administration of TXA in TSA. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies were included, and data were extracted to capture information regarding intervention details and related outcomes such as blood loss, transfusion needs, and complication rates.

Results: A total of 15 studies were included in this review. All selected studies used either intravenous (IV) or topical TXA, with 1 study also including a combined approach of both topical and IV TXA. Of the studies that used an IV approach, the most commonly reported favorable outcomes were a reduction in blood volume loss, reduction in hemoglobin or hematocrit change, and decreased drain output. Dosing varied significantly between all identified studies because some used a standard dosing amount in grams or milligrams for all treatment group participants, whereas others used weight-based dosing amounts. All studies that used a weight-based dosing regimen as well as studies using a standard dosing amount between 1,000 and 5,000 mg reported favorable outcomes for postoperative blood loss.

Conclusion: Both IV and topical TXA clearly demonstrate favorable perioperative hematologic profiles in TSA. Although both approaches have demonstrated a successful association with decreased blood loss and transfusion requirements, there is no definitive benefit to choosing one over the other. Furthermore, the use of oral TXA either in combination or isolation warrants further study in TSA because of its comparable efficacy profiles and significantly lower associated costs of application.

氨甲环酸在全肩关节置换术中的应用:当前做法和未来方向的范围综述。
背景:氨甲环酸(TXA)作为一种抗纤维蛋白溶解剂在全肩关节置换术(TSA)中的疗效已得到充分证实;然而,关于该药物的最佳给药途径和剂量方案,在实践中仍存在相当大的差异。我们的目的是对有关TSA中各种TXA给药方法疗效的文献进行一次范围性综述,并找出可以弥补的知识差距:方法:我们根据《系统综述和元分析的首选报告项目》(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews)指南进行了范围界定综述。检索了 PubMed 和 MEDLINE 电子数据库,以确定 2023 年 3 月之前发表的所有研究在 TSA 中使用 TXA 的文章。研究纳入了随机对照试验和队列研究,并提取了数据以获取有关干预细节和相关结果(如失血量、输血需求和并发症发生率)的信息:本综述共纳入 15 项研究。所有入选研究均采用静脉注射(IV)或局部TXA,其中1项研究还采用了局部TXA和静脉注射TXA相结合的方法。在采用静脉注射方法的研究中,最常报道的有利结果是血容量损失减少、血红蛋白或血细胞比容变化降低以及引流管排出量减少。在所有已确定的研究中,用药剂量差异很大,因为有些研究对所有治疗组的参与者都使用了以克或毫克为单位的标准剂量,而其他研究则使用了基于体重的剂量。所有使用基于体重的给药方案的研究以及使用 1,000 至 5,000 毫克标准给药量的研究都报告了术后失血的良好结果:结论:静脉注射和局部外用 TXA 均明确显示出对 TSA 围手术期血液学状况有利。尽管这两种方法都成功地减少了失血量和输血需求,但选择其中一种方法并没有明确的益处。此外,在 TSA 中联合或单独使用口服 TXA 值得进一步研究,因为其疗效相当,而且相关应用成本明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JBJS Reviews
JBJS Reviews SURGERY-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
132
期刊介绍: JBJS Reviews is an innovative review journal from the publishers of The Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery. This continuously published online journal provides comprehensive, objective, and authoritative review articles written by recognized experts in the field. Edited by Thomas A. Einhorn, MD, and a distinguished Editorial Board, each issue of JBJS Reviews, updates the orthopaedic community on important topics in a concise, time-saving manner, providing expert insights into orthopaedic research and clinical experience. Comprehensive reviews, special features, and integrated CME provide orthopaedic surgeons with valuable perspectives on surgical practice and the latest advances in the field within twelve subspecialty areas: Basic Science, Education & Training, Elbow, Ethics, Foot & Ankle, Hand & Wrist, Hip, Infection, Knee, Oncology, Pediatrics, Pain Management, Rehabilitation, Shoulder, Spine, Sports Medicine, Trauma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信