The quality of qualitative research.

IF 1.2 3区社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY

Medical Humanities Pub Date : 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1136/medhum-2024-012990

Marinus H van IJzendoorn, Siebren Miedema

引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this contribution, we discuss criteria for the quality of qualitative research. We consider reliability and validity as specifications of the comprehensive requirement for 'intersubjective replicability', with which qualitative research should comply. In the data collection phase, 'argumentative' reliability generally must suffice; in the data analysis phase, attention must also be given to 'technical' reliability. Validation of qualitative research has to take place via three approaches: 'communicative', 'critical' or 'empirical' validation. This clarifies the relative validity or 'authenticity' of qualitative research.

查看原文本刊更多论文

定性研究的质量。

在本文中，我们将讨论定性研究的质量标准。我们认为，可靠性和有效性是 "主体间可复制性 "这一综合要求的具体化，定性研究应符合这一要求。在数据收集阶段，"论证 "可靠性一般就足够了；在数据分析阶段，还必须关注 "技术 "可靠性。定性研究必须通过三种方法进行验证：交流"、"批判 "或 "经验 "验证。这就明确了定性研究的相对有效性或 "真实性"。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Medical Humanities HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

8.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： Occupational and Environmental Medicine (OEM) is an international peer reviewed journal concerned with areas of current importance in occupational medicine and environmental health issues throughout the world. Original contributions include epidemiological, physiological and psychological studies of occupational and environmental health hazards as well as toxicological studies of materials posing human health risks. A CPD/CME series aims to help visitors in continuing their professional development. A World at Work series describes workplace hazards and protetctive measures in different workplaces worldwide. A correspondence section provides a forum for debate and notification of preliminary findings.