[Responses of radial growth of Larix principis-rupprechtii at different densities to drought events].

Q3 Environmental Science
Zi-Hang Zhang, Heng Wang, Jian-Heng Jia, Hao-Kang Sun, Jia-Xuan Han, Ming-Ming Guo
{"title":"[Responses of radial growth of <i>Larix principis-rupprechtii</i> at different densities to drought events].","authors":"Zi-Hang Zhang, Heng Wang, Jian-Heng Jia, Hao-Kang Sun, Jia-Xuan Han, Ming-Ming Guo","doi":"10.13287/j.1001-9332.202405.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In recent years, a surge in drought occurrences has dramatically impacted tree growth worldwide. We examined the ecological resilience of <i>Larix principis-rupprechtii</i> plantations with varying densities (1950, 2355, and 2595 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup>) at the Saihanba Mechanical Forest Farm, by extracting the increment cores using the standard dendrochronological method to measure individual-tree basal area increments (BAI) as part of our assessment of ecological resilience, including resistance (<i>R</i><sub>t</sub>), recovery (<i>R</i><sub>c</sub>), and resilience (<i>R</i><sub>s</sub>). The results showed that drought events occurred in 2006-2010, 2015, and 2018. The <i>R</i><sub>t</sub> for <i>L. principis-rupprechtii</i> plantations varied from 0.76 to 2.01 across three drought events, indicating generally high resistance, except for the plantation with 2355 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup> during the second dry year (<i>R</i><sub>t</sub>=0.69). The <i>R</i><sub>t</sub> for the plantation with 2595 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup> significantly decreased across all drought events, while no significant change was observed in the plantations with 1950 and 2355 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup>. The <i>R</i><sub>c</sub> showed no differences in response to a single drought event across plantation densities, with a significant upward trend for all the densities with each occurrence of drought event. There was no significant difference in the resilience of different densities of <i>L. principis-rupprechtii</i> to the first drought event, whereas the plantation with 2595 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup> exhibited significantly lower <i>R</i><sub>s</sub> during the second and third drought events compared with 1950 and 2355 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup>, respectively. During the 2015 drought event, plantation with 2595 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup> experienced a significant growth decline (radial growth change rate was -26.5%), while no such decline was observed in the plantations with 1950 and 2355 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup>. Overall, the plantation with 2595 trees·hm<sup>-2</sup> demonstrated the lowest resilience to drought events.</p>","PeriodicalId":35942,"journal":{"name":"应用生态学报","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"应用生态学报","FirstCategoryId":"1087","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13287/j.1001-9332.202405.005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In recent years, a surge in drought occurrences has dramatically impacted tree growth worldwide. We examined the ecological resilience of Larix principis-rupprechtii plantations with varying densities (1950, 2355, and 2595 trees·hm-2) at the Saihanba Mechanical Forest Farm, by extracting the increment cores using the standard dendrochronological method to measure individual-tree basal area increments (BAI) as part of our assessment of ecological resilience, including resistance (Rt), recovery (Rc), and resilience (Rs). The results showed that drought events occurred in 2006-2010, 2015, and 2018. The Rt for L. principis-rupprechtii plantations varied from 0.76 to 2.01 across three drought events, indicating generally high resistance, except for the plantation with 2355 trees·hm-2 during the second dry year (Rt=0.69). The Rt for the plantation with 2595 trees·hm-2 significantly decreased across all drought events, while no significant change was observed in the plantations with 1950 and 2355 trees·hm-2. The Rc showed no differences in response to a single drought event across plantation densities, with a significant upward trend for all the densities with each occurrence of drought event. There was no significant difference in the resilience of different densities of L. principis-rupprechtii to the first drought event, whereas the plantation with 2595 trees·hm-2 exhibited significantly lower Rs during the second and third drought events compared with 1950 and 2355 trees·hm-2, respectively. During the 2015 drought event, plantation with 2595 trees·hm-2 experienced a significant growth decline (radial growth change rate was -26.5%), while no such decline was observed in the plantations with 1950 and 2355 trees·hm-2. Overall, the plantation with 2595 trees·hm-2 demonstrated the lowest resilience to drought events.

[不同密度 Larix principis-rupprechtii 的径向生长对干旱事件的响应]。
近年来,干旱频发对全球树木生长造成了巨大影响。我们在赛罕坝机械林场考察了不同密度(1950、2355 和 2595 棵树-hm-2)的 Larix principis-rupprechtii 人工林的生态恢复力,采用标准树木年代学方法提取增量核心,测量单棵树木的基部面积增量(BAI),作为生态恢复力评估的一部分,包括抵抗力(Rt)、恢复力(Rc)和复原力(Rs)。结果显示,2006-2010 年、2015 年和 2018 年都发生了干旱事件。在三次干旱事件中,L. principis-rupprechtii 种植园的 Rt 从 0.76 到 2.01 不等,表明除了在第二个干旱年种植 2355 棵树-hm-2 的种植园(Rt=0.69)外,其他种植园的抵抗力普遍较高。在所有干旱事件中,种植 2595 棵树-hm-2 的人工林的 Rt 显著下降,而种植 1950 棵树-hm-2 和 2355 棵树-hm-2 的人工林的 Rt 没有显著变化。不同种植密度的 Rc 对单次干旱事件的响应没有差异,在每次干旱事件发生时,所有种植密度的 Rc 都呈显著上升趋势。不同密度的 L. principis-rupprechtii 对第一次干旱事件的恢复能力没有明显差异,而在第二次和第三次干旱事件中,2595 棵树-hm-2 的种植园的 Rs 分别明显低于 1950 棵树-hm-2 和 2355 棵树-hm-2。在 2015 年的干旱事件中,种植 2595 棵树-hm-2 的人工林出现了明显的生长衰退(径向生长变化率为-26.5%),而种植 1950 棵树和 2355 棵树-hm-2 的人工林则没有出现这种衰退。总体而言,种植 2595 棵树-hm-2 的人工林对干旱事件的适应能力最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
应用生态学报
应用生态学报 Environmental Science-Ecology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11393
期刊介绍:
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信