Development, validation and reliability of a questionnaire to evaluate coaches' and players' perceptions, learning, and resources regarding the ruck in rugby union.

Q3 Health Professions
South African Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-15 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.17159/2078-516X/2024/v36i1a17109
M Brooks, N Parmar, W Kraak
{"title":"Development, validation and reliability of a questionnaire to evaluate coaches' and players' perceptions, learning, and resources regarding the ruck in rugby union.","authors":"M Brooks, N Parmar, W Kraak","doi":"10.17159/2078-516X/2024/v36i1a17109","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The lack of a reliable research tool for assessing the attitudes, behaviours, and learning resources of rugby coaches and players regarding the ruck event is a significant gap in rugby research.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This study aimed to adapt an existing questionnaire focused on the tackle event and to validate and establish the reliability of the instrument. The questionnaire explores the attitudes, behaviours, and learning resources of rugby coaches and players, with a focus on the ruck event and its impact on coach and player development, as well as coaching practices.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A seven-step design process was followed to validate the questionnaire's content, construct, clarity, and relevance. A panel of 12 experts evaluated the questionnaire, followed by a test-retest procedure involving 15 coaches and 16 players, highlighting the effectiveness of this questionnaire, and emphasising its potential to generate data that can impact the field of rugby coaching and player development.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire was deemed appropriate and clear by the expert panel, with an average completion time of 22 minutes. Moderate to good agreement was observed among players (ICC Agreement = 0.71) and coaches (ICC Agreement = 0.88), with high response consistency (ICC Consistency = 0.71 for players and 0.87 for coaches). Significant agreement was also found in Kendall's W scores (players = 0.85, coaches = 0.93, p<0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study presents a developed questionnaire noted for its clarity, reliability, and consistency. It serves as a valuable tool for future rugby research, with the potential to impact coach and player development significantly.</p>","PeriodicalId":31065,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"36 1","pages":"v36i1a17109"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182620/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17159/2078-516X/2024/v36i1a17109","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The lack of a reliable research tool for assessing the attitudes, behaviours, and learning resources of rugby coaches and players regarding the ruck event is a significant gap in rugby research.

Objectives: This study aimed to adapt an existing questionnaire focused on the tackle event and to validate and establish the reliability of the instrument. The questionnaire explores the attitudes, behaviours, and learning resources of rugby coaches and players, with a focus on the ruck event and its impact on coach and player development, as well as coaching practices.

Methods: A seven-step design process was followed to validate the questionnaire's content, construct, clarity, and relevance. A panel of 12 experts evaluated the questionnaire, followed by a test-retest procedure involving 15 coaches and 16 players, highlighting the effectiveness of this questionnaire, and emphasising its potential to generate data that can impact the field of rugby coaching and player development.

Results: The questionnaire was deemed appropriate and clear by the expert panel, with an average completion time of 22 minutes. Moderate to good agreement was observed among players (ICC Agreement = 0.71) and coaches (ICC Agreement = 0.88), with high response consistency (ICC Consistency = 0.71 for players and 0.87 for coaches). Significant agreement was also found in Kendall's W scores (players = 0.85, coaches = 0.93, p<0.01).

Conclusion: This study presents a developed questionnaire noted for its clarity, reliability, and consistency. It serves as a valuable tool for future rugby research, with the potential to impact coach and player development significantly.

开发、验证和可靠评估橄榄球联盟中教练和球员对 ruck 的看法、学习和资源的问卷。
背景:缺乏一种可靠的研究工具来评估橄榄球教练员和运动员对 ruck 事件的态度、行为和学习资源,这是橄榄球研究中的一个重大空白:本研究旨在调整现有的以擒抱动作为重点的调查问卷,并验证和确定该工具的可靠性。该问卷调查了橄榄球教练和球员的态度、行为和学习资源,重点是 ruck 事件及其对教练和球员发展以及教练实践的影响:方法:采用七步设计流程来验证问卷的内容、结构、清晰度和相关性。由 12 位专家组成的小组对问卷进行了评估,随后由 15 名教练和 16 名球员进行了重复测试,突出了该问卷的有效性,并强调了其生成数据的潜力,这些数据可对橄榄球教练和球员发展领域产生影响:结果:专家小组认为该问卷合适、清晰,平均完成时间为 22 分钟。球员(ICC 同意度 = 0.71)和教练(ICC 同意度 = 0.88)之间的同意度为中等至良好,回答一致性较高(球员的 ICC 一致性 = 0.71,教练的 ICC 一致性 = 0.87)。Kendall's W 分数也有显著的一致性(球员 = 0.85,教练 = 0.93,p 结论:本研究提出的问卷清晰、可靠、一致。它是未来橄榄球研究的宝贵工具,有可能对教练和球员的发展产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信