Minimising warm ischaemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. A video-based assessment of tumour excision, kidney reconstruction and intermediate time.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
Ovidiu S Barnoiu, Hamid R Yazdani Arazi, Aage V Andersen
{"title":"Minimising warm ischaemia time during robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. A video-based assessment of tumour excision, kidney reconstruction and intermediate time.","authors":"Ovidiu S Barnoiu, Hamid R Yazdani Arazi, Aage V Andersen","doi":"10.2340/sju.v59.40397","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Surgical video review is an emerging tool for assessing patient outcomes, especially in complex surgeries such as robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Assessing and measuring warm ischaemia time (WIT) during RAPN by dividing it into the time used for tumour excision time (ExcT), time used for kidney reconstruction time (RecT) and intermediate time (IntT) has not been performed before. This study aimed to analyse the factors that can influence all surgical times and assess their impact on positive surgical margins (PSMs) and complication rates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated 32 surgical video recordings from patients undergoing RAPN and measured WIT, ExcT, RecT and IntT with a stopwatch. Factors such as tumour characteristics and surgeon experience were also recorded. SPSS software was used to identify the predictors for all surgical times and to correlate ExcT with PSM and RecT with complication rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We recorded a median WIT of 1,048 s (17 min and 28 s). The median of ExcT, RecT and IntT was 398 s (37.1% of WIT), 518 s (46.7% of WIT) and 180 s (16.2% of WIT), respectively. We found a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between R.E.N.A.L. score and all surgical times. No correlation was found between ExcT and PSM (P = 0.488) and between RecT and the probability of developing complications (P = 0.544).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Tumour morphology influences all surgical times, and surgeon experience influences only ExcT. We observed a short RecT during RAPN though at the cost of increased ExcT, and we believe that improving surgical experience, especially for the excision of more complex tumours, can reduce WIT during RAPN.</p>","PeriodicalId":21542,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Urology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2340/sju.v59.40397","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Surgical video review is an emerging tool for assessing patient outcomes, especially in complex surgeries such as robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN). Assessing and measuring warm ischaemia time (WIT) during RAPN by dividing it into the time used for tumour excision time (ExcT), time used for kidney reconstruction time (RecT) and intermediate time (IntT) has not been performed before. This study aimed to analyse the factors that can influence all surgical times and assess their impact on positive surgical margins (PSMs) and complication rates.

Methods: We evaluated 32 surgical video recordings from patients undergoing RAPN and measured WIT, ExcT, RecT and IntT with a stopwatch. Factors such as tumour characteristics and surgeon experience were also recorded. SPSS software was used to identify the predictors for all surgical times and to correlate ExcT with PSM and RecT with complication rate.

Results: We recorded a median WIT of 1,048 s (17 min and 28 s). The median of ExcT, RecT and IntT was 398 s (37.1% of WIT), 518 s (46.7% of WIT) and 180 s (16.2% of WIT), respectively. We found a significant correlation (P < 0.001) between R.E.N.A.L. score and all surgical times. No correlation was found between ExcT and PSM (P = 0.488) and between RecT and the probability of developing complications (P = 0.544).

Conclusion: Tumour morphology influences all surgical times, and surgeon experience influences only ExcT. We observed a short RecT during RAPN though at the cost of increased ExcT, and we believe that improving surgical experience, especially for the excision of more complex tumours, can reduce WIT during RAPN.

尽量缩短机器人辅助肾部分切除术中的热缺血时间。通过视频评估肿瘤切除、肾脏重建和中间时间。
简介:手术视频回顾是一种新兴的评估患者预后的工具,尤其是在机器人辅助肾部分切除术(RAPN)等复杂手术中。通过将RAPN手术过程中的温缺血时间(WIT)分为肿瘤切除时间(ExcT)、肾脏重建时间(RecT)和中间时间(IntT)来评估和测量温缺血时间(WIT),在此之前尚未进行过。本研究旨在分析影响所有手术时间的因素,并评估这些因素对手术切缘阳性率(PSM)和并发症发生率的影响:我们评估了 32 位接受 RAPN 手术患者的手术录像,并用秒表测量了 WIT、ExcT、RecT 和 IntT。同时还记录了肿瘤特征和外科医生经验等因素。使用 SPSS 软件确定了所有手术时间的预测因素,并将 ExcT 与 PSM 和 RecT 与并发症发生率联系起来:我们记录的中位 WIT 为 1,048 秒(17 分 28 秒)。ExcT、RecT 和 IntT 的中位数分别为 398 秒(占 WIT 的 37.1%)、518 秒(占 WIT 的 46.7%)和 180 秒(占 WIT 的 16.2%)。我们发现,R.E.N.A.L.评分与所有手术时间之间存在明显相关性(P < 0.001)。ExcT和PSM(P = 0.488)之间没有相关性,RecT和出现并发症的概率(P = 0.544)之间也没有相关性:结论:肿瘤形态影响所有手术时间,而外科医生的经验仅影响ExcT。我们观察到 RAPN 期间的 RecT 较短,但代价是 ExcT 增加。我们认为,提高手术经验,尤其是切除更复杂肿瘤的手术经验,可以减少 RAPN 期间的 WIT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Scandinavian Journal of Urology
Scandinavian Journal of Urology UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
6.70%
发文量
70
期刊介绍: Scandinavian Journal of Urology is a journal for the clinical urologist and publishes papers within all fields in clinical urology. Experimental papers related to clinical questions are also invited.Important reports with great news value are published promptly.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信