Factors influencing gastrostomy tube removal.

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q3 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Heather Parr, Sean White, Claire Loversidge, Mohamed G Shiha, Suneil A Raju, Malik S El Atrash, Mark E McAlindon, Andrew D Hopper, Elizabeth A Williams, David S Sanders
{"title":"Factors influencing gastrostomy tube removal.","authors":"Heather Parr, Sean White, Claire Loversidge, Mohamed G Shiha, Suneil A Raju, Malik S El Atrash, Mark E McAlindon, Andrew D Hopper, Elizabeth A Williams, David S Sanders","doi":"10.1080/00365521.2024.2366968","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>When commencing enteral feeding, patients and families will want to know the likelihood of returning to an oral diet. There is a paucity of data on the prognosis of patients with gastrostomies. We describe a large dataset of patients, which identifies factors influencing gastrostomy removal and assesses the likelihood of the patient having at home enteral nutrition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective data was collected on patients from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals who had received a gastrostomy and had outpatient enteral feeding between January 2016 and December 2019. Demographic data, indication and outcomes were analysed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 451 patients were assessed, median age: 67.7. 183/451(40.6%) gastrostomies were for head and neck cancer, 88/451 (19.5%) for stroke, 28/451 (6.2%) for Motor Neuron Disease, 32/451 (7.1%) for other neurodegenerative causes, 120/451 (26.6%) other. Of the 31.2% who had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years, head and neck cancer was the most common indication (58.3%) followed by stroke (10.2%), Motor Neuron Disease (7.1%) and other neurodegenerative diseases (3.1%). Gastrostomy removal was significantly influenced by age, place of residence, and having head and neck cancer (<i>p</i> < 0.05). There was the greatest likelihood of removal within the first year (24%). 70.5% had enteral feeding at home.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This large cohort study demonstrates 31.2% of patients had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years. Head and neck cancer patients, younger age and residing at home can help positively predict removal. Most patients manage their feeding at home rather than a nursing home. This study provides new information on gastrostomy outcomes when counselling patients to provide realistic expectations.</p>","PeriodicalId":21461,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":" ","pages":"1010-1014"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00365521.2024.2366968","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: When commencing enteral feeding, patients and families will want to know the likelihood of returning to an oral diet. There is a paucity of data on the prognosis of patients with gastrostomies. We describe a large dataset of patients, which identifies factors influencing gastrostomy removal and assesses the likelihood of the patient having at home enteral nutrition.

Methods: Retrospective data was collected on patients from Sheffield Teaching Hospitals who had received a gastrostomy and had outpatient enteral feeding between January 2016 and December 2019. Demographic data, indication and outcomes were analysed.

Results: A total of 451 patients were assessed, median age: 67.7. 183/451(40.6%) gastrostomies were for head and neck cancer, 88/451 (19.5%) for stroke, 28/451 (6.2%) for Motor Neuron Disease, 32/451 (7.1%) for other neurodegenerative causes, 120/451 (26.6%) other. Of the 31.2% who had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years, head and neck cancer was the most common indication (58.3%) followed by stroke (10.2%), Motor Neuron Disease (7.1%) and other neurodegenerative diseases (3.1%). Gastrostomy removal was significantly influenced by age, place of residence, and having head and neck cancer (p < 0.05). There was the greatest likelihood of removal within the first year (24%). 70.5% had enteral feeding at home.

Conclusion: This large cohort study demonstrates 31.2% of patients had their gastrostomy removed within 3 years. Head and neck cancer patients, younger age and residing at home can help positively predict removal. Most patients manage their feeding at home rather than a nursing home. This study provides new information on gastrostomy outcomes when counselling patients to provide realistic expectations.

影响胃造瘘管移除的因素。
背景:开始肠内喂养时,患者和家属希望了解恢复口服饮食的可能性。有关胃造口术患者预后的数据很少。我们描述了一个大型患者数据集,该数据集确定了影响胃造口术切除的因素,并评估了患者在家接受肠内营养的可能性:我们收集了谢菲尔德教学医院在 2016 年 1 月至 2019 年 12 月期间接受胃造口术并在门诊进行肠内喂养的患者的回顾性数据。对人口统计学数据、适应症和结果进行了分析:共有 451 名患者接受了评估,年龄中位数为 67.7 岁。183/451(40.6%)例胃造口患者的病因是头颈部癌症,88/451(19.5%)例患者的病因是中风,28/451(6.2%)例患者的病因是运动神经元病,32/451(7.1%)例患者的病因是其他神经退行性病变,120/451(26.6%)例患者的病因是其他。在3年内切除胃造瘘管的31.2%患者中,头颈部癌症是最常见的适应症(58.3%),其次是中风(10.2%)、运动神经元疾病(7.1%)和其他神经退行性疾病(3.1%)。年龄、居住地和是否患有头颈部癌症对胃造口术的切除有明显影响(P 结论:这项大型队列研究表明,31.2%的患者在 3 年内切除了胃造口术。头颈部癌症患者、年龄较小和居住在家中有助于积极预测胃造口的移除。大多数患者在家中而非疗养院进行喂养。这项研究提供了有关胃造口手术结果的新信息,为患者提供了切合实际的期望值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
5.30%
发文量
222
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology is one of the most important journals for international medical research in gastroenterology and hepatology with international contributors, Editorial Board, and distribution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信