Testing the Validity and Reliability of a Standardized Virtual Examination for Concussion.

IF 2.3 Q3 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Neurology. Clinical practice Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-14 DOI:10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200328
Alani I Jack, Helena T Digney, Carter A Bell, Scott N Grossman, Jacob I McPherson, Ghazala T Saleem, Mohammad N Haider, John J Leddy, Barry S Willer, Laura J Balcer, Steven L Galetta, Neil A Busis, Daniel M Torres
{"title":"Testing the Validity and Reliability of a Standardized Virtual Examination for Concussion.","authors":"Alani I Jack, Helena T Digney, Carter A Bell, Scott N Grossman, Jacob I McPherson, Ghazala T Saleem, Mohammad N Haider, John J Leddy, Barry S Willer, Laura J Balcer, Steven L Galetta, Neil A Busis, Daniel M Torres","doi":"10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200328","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>We determined inter-modality (in-person vs telemedicine examination) and inter-rater agreement for telemedicine assessments (2 different examiners) using the Telemedicine Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination (Tele-BCPE), a standardized concussion examination designed for remote use.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients referred for an initial evaluation for concussion were invited to participate. Participants had a brief initial assessment by the treating neurologist. After a patient granted informed consent to participate in the study, the treating neurologist obtained a concussion-related history before leaving the examination room. Using the Tele-BCPE, 2 virtual examinations in no specific sequence were then performed from nearby rooms by the treating neurologist and another neurologist. After the 2 telemedicine examinations, the treating physician returned to the examination room to perform the in-person examination. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined inter-modality validity (in-person vs remote examination by the same examiner) and inter-rater reliability (between remote examinations done by 2 examiners) of overall scores of the Tele-BCPE within the comparison datasets. Cohen's kappa, κ, measured levels of agreement of dichotomous ratings (abnormality present vs absent) on individual components of the Tele-BCPE to determine inter-modality and inter-rater agreement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For total scores of the Tele-BCPE, both inter-modality agreement (ICC = 0.95 [95% CI 0.86-0.98, <i>p</i> < 0.001]) and inter-rater agreement (ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.71-0.95, <i>p</i> < 0.001]) were reliable (ICC >0.70). There was at least substantial inter-modality agreement (κ ≥ 0.61) for 25 of 29 examination elements. For inter-rater agreement (2 telemedicine examinations), there was at least substantial agreement for 8 of 29 examination elements.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study demonstrates that the Tele-BCPE yielded consistent clinical results, whether conducted in-person or virtually by the same examiner, or when performed virtually by 2 different examiners. The Tele-BCPE is a valid indicator of neurologic examination findings as determined by an in-person concussion assessment. The Tele-BCPE may also be performed with excellent levels of reliability by neurologists with different training and backgrounds in the virtual setting. These findings suggest that a combination of in-person and telemedicine modalities, or involvement of 2 telemedicine examiners for the same patient, can provide consistent concussion assessments across the continuum of care.</p>","PeriodicalId":19136,"journal":{"name":"Neurology. Clinical practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11182663/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurology. Clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200328","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: We determined inter-modality (in-person vs telemedicine examination) and inter-rater agreement for telemedicine assessments (2 different examiners) using the Telemedicine Buffalo Concussion Physical Examination (Tele-BCPE), a standardized concussion examination designed for remote use.

Methods: Patients referred for an initial evaluation for concussion were invited to participate. Participants had a brief initial assessment by the treating neurologist. After a patient granted informed consent to participate in the study, the treating neurologist obtained a concussion-related history before leaving the examination room. Using the Tele-BCPE, 2 virtual examinations in no specific sequence were then performed from nearby rooms by the treating neurologist and another neurologist. After the 2 telemedicine examinations, the treating physician returned to the examination room to perform the in-person examination. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) determined inter-modality validity (in-person vs remote examination by the same examiner) and inter-rater reliability (between remote examinations done by 2 examiners) of overall scores of the Tele-BCPE within the comparison datasets. Cohen's kappa, κ, measured levels of agreement of dichotomous ratings (abnormality present vs absent) on individual components of the Tele-BCPE to determine inter-modality and inter-rater agreement.

Results: For total scores of the Tele-BCPE, both inter-modality agreement (ICC = 0.95 [95% CI 0.86-0.98, p < 0.001]) and inter-rater agreement (ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.71-0.95, p < 0.001]) were reliable (ICC >0.70). There was at least substantial inter-modality agreement (κ ≥ 0.61) for 25 of 29 examination elements. For inter-rater agreement (2 telemedicine examinations), there was at least substantial agreement for 8 of 29 examination elements.

Discussion: Our study demonstrates that the Tele-BCPE yielded consistent clinical results, whether conducted in-person or virtually by the same examiner, or when performed virtually by 2 different examiners. The Tele-BCPE is a valid indicator of neurologic examination findings as determined by an in-person concussion assessment. The Tele-BCPE may also be performed with excellent levels of reliability by neurologists with different training and backgrounds in the virtual setting. These findings suggest that a combination of in-person and telemedicine modalities, or involvement of 2 telemedicine examiners for the same patient, can provide consistent concussion assessments across the continuum of care.

测试脑震荡标准化虚拟检查的有效性和可靠性。
背景和目标:我们使用远程医疗水牛城脑震荡体格检查(Tele-BCPE)确定了远程医疗评估(2 名不同的检查者)的模式间差异(面对面检查与远程医疗检查)和评分者间的一致性,远程医疗水牛城脑震荡体格检查是专为远程使用而设计的标准化脑震荡检查:方法:邀请转诊进行脑震荡初步评估的患者参加。神经科主治医生会对参与者进行简短的初步评估。在患者知情同意参与研究后,神经科主治医师在离开检查室之前会询问患者与脑震荡相关的病史。然后,主治神经科医生和另一名神经科医生在附近的房间内使用远程脑震荡综合评估系统(Tele-BCPE)进行了 2 次虚拟检查,检查没有特定顺序。2 次远程医疗检查结束后,主治医生返回检查室进行现场检查。类内相关系数(ICC)确定了对比数据集中远程 BCPE 总分的模式间有效性(由同一检查者进行的面对面检查与远程检查)和评分者间可靠性(由两名检查者进行的远程检查)。科恩卡帕(Cohen's kappa, κ)测量了远程BCPE各组成部分的二分法评分(存在异常与不存在异常)的一致性水平,以确定模式间和评分者间的一致性:对于 Tele-BCPE 的总分,模式间一致性(ICC = 0.95 [95% CI 0.86-0.98,p < 0.001])和评分者间一致性(ICC = 0.88 [95% CI 0.71-0.95,p < 0.001])均可靠(ICC >0.70)。在 29 项检查要素中,有 25 项至少具有相当程度的模式间一致性(κ ≥ 0.61)。至于评分者之间的一致性(2 次远程医疗检查),29 项检查要素中有 8 项至少达到了基本一致:讨论:我们的研究表明,无论是由同一考官亲自或通过虚拟方式进行远程 BCPE,还是由两名不同的考官通过虚拟方式进行远程 BCPE,其临床结果都是一致的。远程脑震荡综合评估是通过现场脑震荡评估确定神经系统检查结果的有效指标。在虚拟环境中,由受过不同培训和拥有不同背景的神经科医生进行远程脑震荡评估,也能达到极佳的可靠性水平。这些研究结果表明,将现场和远程医疗模式相结合,或由两名远程医疗检查人员共同为同一患者进行检查,可以在整个治疗过程中提供一致的脑震荡评估结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Neurology. Clinical practice
Neurology. Clinical practice CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
77
期刊介绍: Neurology® Genetics is an online open access journal publishing peer-reviewed reports in the field of neurogenetics. The journal publishes original articles in all areas of neurogenetics including rare and common genetic variations, genotype-phenotype correlations, outlier phenotypes as a result of mutations in known disease genes, and genetic variations with a putative link to diseases. Articles include studies reporting on genetic disease risk, pharmacogenomics, and results of gene-based clinical trials (viral, ASO, etc.). Genetically engineered model systems are not a primary focus of Neurology® Genetics, but studies using model systems for treatment trials, including well-powered studies reporting negative results, are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信