Photobiomodulation versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for stria alba in phototype III-IV: a randomized controlled study.

IF 2.1 4区 医学 Q3 ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL
Vanessa Hafez, Doaa Mahgoub, Elsayed Mohamed Ali Satour, Marina Mozeih Shaker Mikhail, Mona El-Kalioby
{"title":"Photobiomodulation versus fractional carbon dioxide laser for stria alba in phototype III-IV: a randomized controlled study.","authors":"Vanessa Hafez, Doaa Mahgoub, Elsayed Mohamed Ali Satour, Marina Mozeih Shaker Mikhail, Mona El-Kalioby","doi":"10.1007/s10103-024-04107-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Striae distensae are common dermatological complaint. Cold laser using low-level light/laser therapy (LLLT) offers healing and analgesic effects and was not yet compared to 'hot lasers' efficacy. Study objective: to assess the efficacy and safety of LLLT in the management of stria alba compared to fractional carbon dioxide (FCO<sub>2</sub>) laser alone and to the combined use of both devices. Thirty patients with stria alba were randomized to receive either LLLT using diode 808 nm; 8-12 sessions, 2-3 sessions weekly (Group A) or FCO<sub>2</sub> laser; 2 monthly sessions (Group B) or combined both devices simultaneously (Group C). Follow up was at 1 month and 3 months after last session. The efficacy of LLLT was statistically comparable to FCO2, despite numerical superiority of the latter. The combined group had the least numerical values in all efficacy outcomes. Patients in LLLT group did not experience any downtime. LLLT is effective in the management of stria alba comparable to the FCO<sub>2</sub> laser. The lack of downtime with LLLT is reflected positively on patient's satisfaction. However, this is counterbalanced by the frequent weekly visits. Although adding LLLT to FCO2 laser palliates the laser side effects but it offers the least efficacy. Trial registration number NCT04165226 (clinicaltrials.gov).</p>","PeriodicalId":17978,"journal":{"name":"Lasers in Medical Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11189306/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lasers in Medical Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10103-024-04107-x","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, BIOMEDICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Striae distensae are common dermatological complaint. Cold laser using low-level light/laser therapy (LLLT) offers healing and analgesic effects and was not yet compared to 'hot lasers' efficacy. Study objective: to assess the efficacy and safety of LLLT in the management of stria alba compared to fractional carbon dioxide (FCO2) laser alone and to the combined use of both devices. Thirty patients with stria alba were randomized to receive either LLLT using diode 808 nm; 8-12 sessions, 2-3 sessions weekly (Group A) or FCO2 laser; 2 monthly sessions (Group B) or combined both devices simultaneously (Group C). Follow up was at 1 month and 3 months after last session. The efficacy of LLLT was statistically comparable to FCO2, despite numerical superiority of the latter. The combined group had the least numerical values in all efficacy outcomes. Patients in LLLT group did not experience any downtime. LLLT is effective in the management of stria alba comparable to the FCO2 laser. The lack of downtime with LLLT is reflected positively on patient's satisfaction. However, this is counterbalanced by the frequent weekly visits. Although adding LLLT to FCO2 laser palliates the laser side effects but it offers the least efficacy. Trial registration number NCT04165226 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Abstract Image

光生物调节与点阵二氧化碳激光治疗 III-IV 型白纹病:随机对照研究。
条纹扩张是一种常见的皮肤病。使用低强度光/激光疗法(LLLT)的冷激光具有愈合和镇痛效果,但尚未与 "热激光 "的疗效进行比较。研究目的:评估低强度光/激光疗法与单独使用点阵二氧化碳(FCO2)激光以及两种设备联合使用治疗白纹病的疗效和安全性。30 名白纹病患者被随机分配接受使用二极管 808 纳米激光的 LLLT 治疗,疗程为 8-12 次,每周 2-3 次(A 组),或 FCO2 激光治疗,每月 2 次(B 组),或同时联合使用两种设备(C 组)。随访时间为最后一次治疗后的 1 个月和 3 个月。从统计学角度看,LLLT 的疗效与 FCO2 相当,尽管后者在数值上更胜一筹。在所有疗效结果中,联合组的数值最小。LLLT 组患者没有任何停工期。LLLT 治疗白纹的效果与 FCO2 激光相当。LLLT 无停工期对患者的满意度有积极影响。不过,每周一次的频繁就诊也抵消了这一点。虽然在 FCO2 激光疗法中加入 LLLT 可以减轻激光的副作用,但其疗效却最差。试验注册号 NCT04165226(clinicaltrials.gov)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lasers in Medical Science
Lasers in Medical Science 医学-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
4.80%
发文量
192
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Lasers in Medical Science (LIMS) has established itself as the leading international journal in the rapidly expanding field of medical and dental applications of lasers and light. It provides a forum for the publication of papers on the technical, experimental, and clinical aspects of the use of medical lasers, including lasers in surgery, endoscopy, angioplasty, hyperthermia of tumors, and photodynamic therapy. In addition to medical laser applications, LIMS presents high-quality manuscripts on a wide range of dental topics, including aesthetic dentistry, endodontics, orthodontics, and prosthodontics. The journal publishes articles on the medical and dental applications of novel laser technologies, light delivery systems, sensors to monitor laser effects, basic laser-tissue interactions, and the modeling of laser-tissue interactions. Beyond laser applications, LIMS features articles relating to the use of non-laser light-tissue interactions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信