Are professional road cycling countries selecting their talents based on anthropometric characteristics which suit the countries' terrain?

Abstract

Background: This study investigates if countries are more focused on certain specializations (one day, climb, sprint, time trial [TT] and grand tour [GC]) in male professional road cycling and if this is possibly linked to the countries landscape (for example, does a mountainous country have more climbers?) and anthropometric characteristics (does the mountainous country also have lighter cyclists?) of their cyclists.

Methods: Body weight, height, procyclingstats (PCS) points per specialty were gathered from 1810 professional cyclists out of 15 countries, as well as the elevation span of those countries. To compare the anthropometric differences between different countries, height was normalized based on the average height of the countries' population, while BMI was used as a correction for body weight.

Results: The average anthropometrics (body weight and height) of professional cyclists in a country are related to the relative number of PCS points collected in GC, sprint and climb races. This means that when a country has shorter and lighter cyclists, they score relatively better in GC and climb races and vice versa for sprint races, which indicates that countries are focused on certain specialties. However, these relationships were not found for TT and one day PCS points. In addition, countries with larger cyclists have a less mountainous (elevation span) landscape compared to countries with lighter cyclists.

Conclusions: The results suggest a selection bias towards smaller/lighter or taller/heavier cyclists in various countries, probably caused by the terrain of their home country, leading to missed opportunities for some cyclists to reach professional level.