Efficacy and safety of personalized optimal PD-(L)1 combinations in advanced NSCLC: a network meta-analysis.

IF 9.9 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Xianjing Chu, Wentao Tian, Jiaoyang Ning, Rongrong Zhou
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of personalized optimal PD-(L)1 combinations in advanced NSCLC: a network meta-analysis.","authors":"Xianjing Chu, Wentao Tian, Jiaoyang Ning, Rongrong Zhou","doi":"10.1093/jnci/djae137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-directed immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the optimal therapeutic combinations remain uncertain.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Our study encompassed phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved anti-PD-(L)1-based therapies for stage-IV NSCLC. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidences of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted by treatment lines, PD-L1 expression levels, histological types, and metastatic sites.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our analysis incorporated 38 publications, covering 14 therapeutic combinations and involving 18 048 participants. PD-(L)1+chemotherapy (CT), PD-(L)1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) +CT, and PD-(L)1+ T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain were notably effective in prolonging OS. Overall, PD-(L)1+CT and PD-(L)1+CT+ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly beneficial for PFS and ORR. As for the subsequent-line treatments, incorporating radiotherapy can enhance PFS and ORR (ranked fourth among enrolled treatments). For patients with PD-L1 <1%, PD-(L)1+CT+VEGF and PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT were favorable approaches. Conversely, in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, PD-(L)1+CT represented an effective treatment. Patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma or liver metastases might benefit from the addition of VEGF. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma or brain metastases, the combination of PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT yielded superior benefits.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study underscores the enhanced efficacy of combination immunotherapies over monotherapy. It highlights the necessity for personalized treatment, considering individual factors. These insights are vital for clinical decision making in the management of advanced NSCLC.</p>","PeriodicalId":14809,"journal":{"name":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","volume":" ","pages":"1571-1586"},"PeriodicalIF":9.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djae137","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Programmed death 1 (PD-1)/programmed death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1)-directed immunotherapy has revolutionized the treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), whereas the optimal therapeutic combinations remain uncertain.

Methods: Our study encompassed phase II/III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that involved anti-PD-(L)1-based therapies for stage-IV NSCLC. The primary outcomes included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and incidences of adverse events. Subgroup analyses were conducted by treatment lines, PD-L1 expression levels, histological types, and metastatic sites.

Results: Our analysis incorporated 38 publications, covering 14 therapeutic combinations and involving 18 048 participants. PD-(L)1+chemotherapy (CT), PD-(L)1+ cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA4) +CT, and PD-(L)1+ T-cell immunoglobulin and ITIM domain were notably effective in prolonging OS. Overall, PD-(L)1+CT and PD-(L)1+CT+ vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were significantly beneficial for PFS and ORR. As for the subsequent-line treatments, incorporating radiotherapy can enhance PFS and ORR (ranked fourth among enrolled treatments). For patients with PD-L1 <1%, PD-(L)1+CT+VEGF and PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT were favorable approaches. Conversely, in patients with PD-L1 ≥50%, PD-(L)1+CT represented an effective treatment. Patients with nonsquamous cell carcinoma or liver metastases might benefit from the addition of VEGF. In cases of squamous cell carcinoma or brain metastases, the combination of PD-(L)1+CTLA4+CT yielded superior benefits.

Conclusions: This study underscores the enhanced efficacy of combination immunotherapies over monotherapy. It highlights the necessity for personalized treatment, considering individual factors. These insights are vital for clinical decision making in the management of advanced NSCLC.

晚期 NSCLC 中个性化最佳 PD-(L)1 组合的疗效和安全性:网络 Meta 分析。
导言:程序性死亡1(PD-1)/程序性死亡1配体1(PD-L1)引导的免疫疗法彻底改变了晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的治疗方法,但最佳治疗组合仍不确定:我们的研究涵盖了以抗PD-(L)1为基础的治疗IV期NSCLC的Ⅱ/Ⅲ期随机对照试验(RCT)。主要结果包括总生存期(OS)、无进展生存期(PFS)、客观反应率(ORR)和不良事件(AEs)发生率。按照治疗方案、PD-L1表达水平、组织学类型和转移部位进行了亚组分析:我们的分析纳入了38篇文献,涵盖14种治疗组合,涉及18048名参与者。PD-(L)1+化疗(CT)、PD-(L)1+细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原-4(CTLA4)+CT以及PD-(L)1+T细胞免疫球蛋白和ITIM结构域(TIGIT)在延长OS方面效果显著。总体而言,PD-(L)1+CT和PD-(L)1+CT+血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)对PFS和ORR有显著疗效。至于后续治疗,结合放疗可提高PFS和ORR(在入选治疗中排名第四)。对于PD-L1患者的结论:本研究强调了联合免疫疗法的疗效优于单一疗法。它强调了考虑个体因素进行个性化治疗的必要性。这些见解对于晚期NSCLC治疗的临床决策至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
17.00
自引率
2.90%
发文量
203
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the National Cancer Institute is a reputable publication that undergoes a peer-review process. It is available in both print (ISSN: 0027-8874) and online (ISSN: 1460-2105) formats, with 12 issues released annually. The journal's primary aim is to disseminate innovative and important discoveries in the field of cancer research, with specific emphasis on clinical, epidemiologic, behavioral, and health outcomes studies. Authors are encouraged to submit reviews, minireviews, and commentaries. The journal ensures that submitted manuscripts undergo a rigorous and expedited review to publish scientifically and medically significant findings in a timely manner.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信