Reduction of ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) during storage despite plasma renewal: evidence for hemostatic importance of GPIbα shedding.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q2 HEMATOLOGY
Expert Review of Hematology Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-21 DOI:10.1080/17474086.2024.2370557
Ehteramolsadat Hosseini, Emad Taherabadi, Ali Rajabi, Mehran Ghasemzadeh
{"title":"Reduction of ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) during storage despite plasma renewal: evidence for hemostatic importance of GPIbα shedding.","authors":"Ehteramolsadat Hosseini, Emad Taherabadi, Ali Rajabi, Mehran Ghasemzadeh","doi":"10.1080/17474086.2024.2370557","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Platelet storage is complicated by deleterious changes, among which reduction of ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) has a poorly understood mechanism. The study elucidates the mechanistic roles of all the possible players in this process.</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>PRP-platelet concentrates were subjected to RIPA, collagen-induced platelet aggregation (CIPA), and flowcytometric analysis of GPIbα and PAC-1 binding from days 0 to 5 of storage. Platelet-poor plasma was subjected to colorimetric assays for glucose/LDH evaluation and automatic analyzer to examine VWF antigen and activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From day three of platelet storage, reducing CIPA but not RIPA was correlated with the reduction of both metabolic state and integrin activity. RIPA reduction was directly related to the decreased levels of total-content/expression of GPIbα, and inversely related to its shedding levels during storage. Re-suspension of 5-day stored platelet in fresh plasma compensated CIPA, but not RIPA. VWF concentration and its activity did not change during storage while they had no correlation with RIPA.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study identified the irreversible loss of platelet GPIbα, but not VWF status, as the primary cause of the storage-dependent decrease of RIPA. Unlike CIPA, this observation was not compensated by plasma refreshment, suggesting that some evidence of PSL may not be recovered after transfusion.</p>","PeriodicalId":12325,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Hematology","volume":" ","pages":"391-403"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Hematology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2024.2370557","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/21 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HEMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Platelet storage is complicated by deleterious changes, among which reduction of ristocetin-induced platelet aggregation (RIPA) has a poorly understood mechanism. The study elucidates the mechanistic roles of all the possible players in this process.

Research design and methods: PRP-platelet concentrates were subjected to RIPA, collagen-induced platelet aggregation (CIPA), and flowcytometric analysis of GPIbα and PAC-1 binding from days 0 to 5 of storage. Platelet-poor plasma was subjected to colorimetric assays for glucose/LDH evaluation and automatic analyzer to examine VWF antigen and activity.

Results: From day three of platelet storage, reducing CIPA but not RIPA was correlated with the reduction of both metabolic state and integrin activity. RIPA reduction was directly related to the decreased levels of total-content/expression of GPIbα, and inversely related to its shedding levels during storage. Re-suspension of 5-day stored platelet in fresh plasma compensated CIPA, but not RIPA. VWF concentration and its activity did not change during storage while they had no correlation with RIPA.

Conclusions: This study identified the irreversible loss of platelet GPIbα, but not VWF status, as the primary cause of the storage-dependent decrease of RIPA. Unlike CIPA, this observation was not compensated by plasma refreshment, suggesting that some evidence of PSL may not be recovered after transfusion.

尽管血浆可以更新,但储存期间利斯托西汀诱导的血小板聚集(RIPA)会降低:GPIbα脱落对止血的重要性证据。
背景:血小板贮存通常会因有害变化而变得复杂,其中利斯托西汀诱导的血小板聚集(RIPA)的减少机制尚不清楚。本研究旨在阐明这一过程中所有可能参与者的机制作用,包括 GPIbα 的状态(其血小板表达/总含量和外域脱落)、VWF 水平或其活性、代谢状态和整合素激活:对 PRP-血小板浓缩物进行 RIPA、胶原诱导血小板聚集(CIPA)和流式细胞计数分析,分析储存第 0 至 5 天的 GPIbα 表达和 PAC-1 结合情况。贫血小板血浆通过比色法评估葡萄糖和 LDH,或通过自动分析仪检测 VWF 抗原和活性:结果:从血小板储存的第三天起,CIPA(而非 RIPA)的降低与代谢状态和整合素活性的降低显著相关。RIPA 的降低与 GPIbα 总含量/表达水平的降低直接相关,而与储存各阶段的脱落水平成反比。将储存 5 天的血小板重新悬浮在新鲜血浆中可补偿 CIPA,但不能补偿 RIPA。VWF 浓度及其活性在储存期间没有变化,而与 RIPA 没有相关性:本研究发现,血小板 GPIbα 的不可逆损失是导致 RIPA 存储依赖性下降的主要原因,而非 VWF 状态。与 CIPA 不同的是,这一观察结果并没有得到血浆更新的补偿,这表明 PSL 的某些证据在输血后可能无法恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
98
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Advanced molecular research techniques have transformed hematology in recent years. With improved understanding of hematologic diseases, we now have the opportunity to research and evaluate new biological therapies, new drugs and drug combinations, new treatment schedules and novel approaches including stem cell transplantation. We can also expect proteomics, molecular genetics and biomarker research to facilitate new diagnostic approaches and the identification of appropriate therapies. Further advances in our knowledge regarding the formation and function of blood cells and blood-forming tissues should ensue, and it will be a major challenge for hematologists to adopt these new paradigms and develop integrated strategies to define the best possible patient care. Expert Review of Hematology (1747-4086) puts these advances in context and explores how they will translate directly into clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信