The microbiota in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY
BJU International Pub Date : 2024-12-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-18 DOI:10.1111/bju.16439
Chaowei Fu, Yuwei Zhang, Linghui Liang, Hao Lin, Kai Shan, Fengping Liu, Ninghan Feng
{"title":"The microbiota in patients with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome: a systematic review.","authors":"Chaowei Fu, Yuwei Zhang, Linghui Liang, Hao Lin, Kai Shan, Fengping Liu, Ninghan Feng","doi":"10.1111/bju.16439","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To comprehensively review and critically assess the literature on microbiota differences between patients with interstitial cystitis (IC)/bladder pain syndrome (BPS) and normal controls and to provide clinical practice guidelines.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this systematic review, we evaluated previous research on microbiota disparities between IC/BPS and normal controls, as well as distinctions among IC/BPS subgroups. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Relevant studies were shortlisted based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by quality assessment. The primary focus was identifying specific taxonomic variations among these cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 12 studies met the selection criteria. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Predominantly, the studies focused on disparities in urine microbiota between IC/BPS patients and normal controls, with one study examining gut microbiota differences between the groups, and two studies exploring vaginal microbiota distinctions. Unfortunately, analyses of discrepancies in other microbiota were limited. Our findings revealed evidence of distinct bacterial abundance variations, particularly involving Lactobacillus, alongside variations in specific metabolites among IC/BPS patients compared to controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently, there is evidence suggesting significant variations in the diversity and species composition of the urinary microbiota between individuals diagnosed with IC/BPS and control groups. In the foreseeable future, urologists should consider urine microbiota dysbiosis as a potential aetiology for IC, with potential clinical implications for diagnosis and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":8985,"journal":{"name":"BJU International","volume":" ","pages":"869-880"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJU International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.16439","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/18 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To comprehensively review and critically assess the literature on microbiota differences between patients with interstitial cystitis (IC)/bladder pain syndrome (BPS) and normal controls and to provide clinical practice guidelines.

Materials and methods: In this systematic review, we evaluated previous research on microbiota disparities between IC/BPS and normal controls, as well as distinctions among IC/BPS subgroups. A comprehensive literature search was conducted across PubMed/MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Relevant studies were shortlisted based on predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, followed by quality assessment. The primary focus was identifying specific taxonomic variations among these cohorts.

Results: A total of 12 studies met the selection criteria. Discrepancies were adjudicated by a third reviewer. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess study quality. Predominantly, the studies focused on disparities in urine microbiota between IC/BPS patients and normal controls, with one study examining gut microbiota differences between the groups, and two studies exploring vaginal microbiota distinctions. Unfortunately, analyses of discrepancies in other microbiota were limited. Our findings revealed evidence of distinct bacterial abundance variations, particularly involving Lactobacillus, alongside variations in specific metabolites among IC/BPS patients compared to controls.

Conclusions: Currently, there is evidence suggesting significant variations in the diversity and species composition of the urinary microbiota between individuals diagnosed with IC/BPS and control groups. In the foreseeable future, urologists should consider urine microbiota dysbiosis as a potential aetiology for IC, with potential clinical implications for diagnosis and treatment.

间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征患者的微生物群:系统综述。
摘要全面回顾并严格评估有关间质性膀胱炎(IC)/膀胱疼痛综合征(BPS)患者与正常对照组之间微生物群差异的文献,并提供临床实践指南:在这篇系统性综述中,我们评估了以往关于间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征患者与正常对照组之间微生物群差异的研究,以及间质性膀胱炎/膀胱疼痛综合征亚组之间的区别。我们在 PubMed/MEDLINE、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials 中进行了全面的文献检索。根据预先确定的纳入和排除标准筛选出相关研究,然后进行质量评估。主要重点是确定这些队列中具体的分类差异:共有 12 项研究符合筛选标准。差异由第三位审稿人裁定。纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表用于评估研究质量。这些研究主要关注 IC/BPS 患者与正常对照组之间尿液微生物群的差异,其中一项研究探讨了两组之间肠道微生物群的差异,还有两项研究探讨了阴道微生物群的差异。遗憾的是,对其他微生物群差异的分析非常有限。我们的研究结果表明,与对照组相比,IC/BPS 患者的细菌丰度存在明显差异,尤其是乳酸杆菌,同时特定代谢物也存在差异:目前,有证据表明,IC/BPS 患者和对照组之间的尿液微生物群的多样性和物种组成存在显著差异。在可预见的未来,泌尿科医生应将尿液微生物群失调视为IC的潜在病因,并对诊断和治疗产生潜在的临床影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BJU International
BJU International 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
9.10
自引率
4.40%
发文量
262
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BJUI is one of the most highly respected medical journals in the world, with a truly international range of published papers and appeal. Every issue gives invaluable practical information in the form of original articles, reviews, comments, surgical education articles, and translational science articles in the field of urology. BJUI employs topical sections, and is in full colour, making it easier to browse or search for something specific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信