Diagnostic accuracy of CT-based radiomics and deep learning for predicting lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer

IF 1.8 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Payam Jannatdoust , Parya Valizadeh , Mohammad-Taha Pahlevan-Fallahy , Amir Hassankhani , Melika Amoukhteh , Sadra Behrouzieh , Delaram J. Ghadimi , Cem Bilgin , Ali Gholamrezanezhad
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy of CT-based radiomics and deep learning for predicting lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer","authors":"Payam Jannatdoust ,&nbsp;Parya Valizadeh ,&nbsp;Mohammad-Taha Pahlevan-Fallahy ,&nbsp;Amir Hassankhani ,&nbsp;Melika Amoukhteh ,&nbsp;Sadra Behrouzieh ,&nbsp;Delaram J. Ghadimi ,&nbsp;Cem Bilgin ,&nbsp;Ali Gholamrezanezhad","doi":"10.1016/j.clinimag.2024.110225","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Esophageal cancer remains a global challenge due to late diagnoses and limited treatments. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial for prognosis, yet traditional diagnostics fall short. Integrating radiomics and deep learning (DL) with CT imaging for LNM diagnosis could revolutionize prognostic assessment and treatment planning.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 1, 2023. The focus was on studies developing CT-based radiomics and/or DL models for preoperative LNM detection in esophageal cancer. Methodological quality was assessed using the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Twelve studies were reviewed, and seven were included in the meta-analysis, most showing excellent methodological quality. Training sets revealed a pooled AUC of 87 % (95 % CI: 78 %–90 %), and internal validation sets showed an AUC of 85 % (95 % CI: 76 %–89 %), with no significant difference (<em>p</em> = 0.39). Sensitivity and specificity for training sets were 78.7 % and 81.8 %, respectively, with validation sets at 81.2 % and 76.2 %. DL models in training sets showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiomics (<em>p</em> = 0.054), significant after removing outliers (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.01). Incorporating clinical data improved sensitivity in validation sets (<em>p</em> = 0.029). No significant difference was found between models based on CE or non-CE imaging (<em>p</em> = 0.281) or arterial or venous phase imaging (<em>p</em> = 0.927).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Integrating CT-based radiomics and DL improves LNM detection in esophageal cancer. Including clinical data could enhance model performance. Future research should focus on multicenter studies with independent validations to confirm these findings and promote broader clinical adoption.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":50680,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0899707124001554","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Esophageal cancer remains a global challenge due to late diagnoses and limited treatments. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial for prognosis, yet traditional diagnostics fall short. Integrating radiomics and deep learning (DL) with CT imaging for LNM diagnosis could revolutionize prognostic assessment and treatment planning.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted by searching PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase up to October 1, 2023. The focus was on studies developing CT-based radiomics and/or DL models for preoperative LNM detection in esophageal cancer. Methodological quality was assessed using the METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS).

Results

Twelve studies were reviewed, and seven were included in the meta-analysis, most showing excellent methodological quality. Training sets revealed a pooled AUC of 87 % (95 % CI: 78 %–90 %), and internal validation sets showed an AUC of 85 % (95 % CI: 76 %–89 %), with no significant difference (p = 0.39). Sensitivity and specificity for training sets were 78.7 % and 81.8 %, respectively, with validation sets at 81.2 % and 76.2 %. DL models in training sets showed better diagnostic accuracy than radiomics (p = 0.054), significant after removing outliers (p < 0.01). Incorporating clinical data improved sensitivity in validation sets (p = 0.029). No significant difference was found between models based on CE or non-CE imaging (p = 0.281) or arterial or venous phase imaging (p = 0.927).

Conclusion

Integrating CT-based radiomics and DL improves LNM detection in esophageal cancer. Including clinical data could enhance model performance. Future research should focus on multicenter studies with independent validations to confirm these findings and promote broader clinical adoption.

基于 CT 的放射组学和深度学习预测食管癌淋巴结转移的诊断准确性
背景由于诊断较晚和治疗手段有限,食管癌仍然是一项全球性挑战。淋巴结转移(LNM)对预后至关重要,但传统诊断方法并不完善。方法通过检索PubMed、Scopus、Web of Science和Embase(截至2023年10月1日),进行了系统综述和荟萃分析。重点是针对食管癌术前LNM检测开发基于CT的放射组学和/或DL模型的研究。采用METhodological RadiomICs Score (METRICS)对方法学质量进行了评估。训练集显示的集合AUC为87%(95% CI:78%-90%),内部验证集显示的AUC为85%(95% CI:76%-89%),无显著差异(p = 0.39)。训练集的灵敏度和特异度分别为 78.7 % 和 81.8 %,验证集为 81.2 % 和 76.2 %。与放射组学相比,训练集中的 DL 模型显示出更高的诊断准确性(p = 0.054),在剔除异常值(p < 0.01)后,诊断准确性显著提高。结合临床数据提高了验证集的灵敏度(p = 0.029)。基于 CE 或非 CE 成像(p = 0.281)或动脉或静脉相位成像(p = 0.927)的模型之间无明显差异。纳入临床数据可提高模型性能。未来的研究应重点关注具有独立验证的多中心研究,以证实这些发现并促进更广泛的临床应用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Imaging
Clinical Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
265
审稿时长
35 days
期刊介绍: The mission of Clinical Imaging is to publish, in a timely manner, the very best radiology research from the United States and around the world with special attention to the impact of medical imaging on patient care. The journal''s publications cover all imaging modalities, radiology issues related to patients, policy and practice improvements, and clinically-oriented imaging physics and informatics. The journal is a valuable resource for practicing radiologists, radiologists-in-training and other clinicians with an interest in imaging. Papers are carefully peer-reviewed and selected by our experienced subject editors who are leading experts spanning the range of imaging sub-specialties, which include: -Body Imaging- Breast Imaging- Cardiothoracic Imaging- Imaging Physics and Informatics- Molecular Imaging and Nuclear Medicine- Musculoskeletal and Emergency Imaging- Neuroradiology- Practice, Policy & Education- Pediatric Imaging- Vascular and Interventional Radiology
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信