Errors in the Auditor’s Report—A Teaching Case

IF 16.4 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Kelsey R. Brasel, Michelle A. Draeger, Eric T. Rapley
{"title":"Errors in the Auditor’s Report—A Teaching Case","authors":"Kelsey R. Brasel, Michelle A. Draeger, Eric T. Rapley","doi":"10.2308/issues-2021-129","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This series of three exercises engages students with experiential learning related to the PCAOB’s unqualified auditor’s report on financial statements. The case can be facilitated either in the classroom or online and is easily customizable for undergraduate and graduate audit courses. The case can provide a 20-minute introduction of the auditor’s report to an entire class period filled with exercises covering different aspects of audit opinion reporting and discussing an ethical decision-making process. During the first two exercises, students analyze auditor’s reports to detect deviations from the PCAOB standard unqualified auditor’s report. During the third exercise, students use the Giving Voice to Values (GVV) approach to plan a strategy for correcting an auditor’s report error, despite their audit manager’s initial instructions to ignore the issue. By applying the GVV ethical decision-making framework in an auditor decision context, the case prompts students to infer and consider different stakeholders’ incentives and biases.\n Data Availability: Data are available upon request.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":16.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2308/issues-2021-129","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This series of three exercises engages students with experiential learning related to the PCAOB’s unqualified auditor’s report on financial statements. The case can be facilitated either in the classroom or online and is easily customizable for undergraduate and graduate audit courses. The case can provide a 20-minute introduction of the auditor’s report to an entire class period filled with exercises covering different aspects of audit opinion reporting and discussing an ethical decision-making process. During the first two exercises, students analyze auditor’s reports to detect deviations from the PCAOB standard unqualified auditor’s report. During the third exercise, students use the Giving Voice to Values (GVV) approach to plan a strategy for correcting an auditor’s report error, despite their audit manager’s initial instructions to ignore the issue. By applying the GVV ethical decision-making framework in an auditor decision context, the case prompts students to infer and consider different stakeholders’ incentives and biases. Data Availability: Data are available upon request.
审计报告中的错误--教学案例
本系列共有三个练习,让学生参与有关 PCAOB 无保留意见财务报表审计报告的体验式学习。该案例既可以在课堂上进行,也可以在网上进行,而且很容易为本科生和研究生审计课程定制。该案例可以提供 20 分钟的审计师报告介绍,也可以提供整节课的练习,涵盖审计意见报告的不同方面,并讨论道德决策过程。在前两个练习中,学生分析审计师报告,以发现与 PCAOB 标准无保留审计师报告的偏差。在第三个练习中,尽管审计经理最初指示学生不要理会审计报告中的错误,但学生们还是使用了 "为价值发声"(GVV)的方法来规划纠正审计报告错误的策略。通过将 GVV 道德决策框架应用于审计师决策环境中,本案例促使学生推断并考虑不同利益相关者的动机和偏见。数据提供:数据可应要求提供。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信