Occupation and demand for health services in Italy: Ways and means to reduce the opportunity costs imposed on patients

IF 3.1 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Giuliana De Luca , Michela Ponzo
{"title":"Occupation and demand for health services in Italy: Ways and means to reduce the opportunity costs imposed on patients","authors":"Giuliana De Luca ,&nbsp;Michela Ponzo","doi":"10.1016/j.jpolmod.2024.05.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div><span>This paper explores whether and to which extent employment condition and working hours influence individuals’ decision process in consuming primary care. The hypothesis is that the higher the workers’ opportunity cost in terms of earning forgone, the less the demand for General Practitioner (GP) visits. Using survey data provided by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), we estimate a negative binomial regression model of GP visits as a function of employment related variables, controlling for a rich set of individual demographic characteristics, socio-economic variables, health status<span>, supply and geographical factors. We show that self-employed workers, managers and cadres use significantly less primary care services notwithstanding the access is free. We conclude that they have higher opportunity costs than white and blue collars since they suffer more from the loss of earnings related to the </span></span>absence<span><span> from work. Self-employed individuals often face barriers to accessing healthcare services, such as lack of employer-sponsored </span>health insurance and concerns about lost income during time off for medical appointments. As a result, they may delay seeking healthcare until their condition becomes more severe, leading to poorer health outcomes. Managers and cadres, on the other hand, may have greater access to healthcare services due to higher income levels and better job benefits. However, they may still face challenges such as long working hours and job-related stress, which can impact their ability to prioritize their health and seek timely medical care.</span></div><div>From a policy perspective, our results suggest potential policy interventions aimed at addressing barriers to healthcare access for self-employed workers and promoting equitable healthcare utilization across different employment groups. Policy recommendations may include measures to enhance <em>financial support</em><span> (tax deductions for medical expenses, subsidies for health insurance premiums, or grants to cover the costs of healthcare-related absences from work), increase </span><em>healthcare accessibility</em> (enhancing the availability of mobile clinics, and extending operating hours for primary care facilities to accommodate the needs of working individuals) and raise awareness about <em>preventive care</em><span> among self-employed workers (workplace wellness programs, and incentives for regular health check-ups, screenings and healthy lifestyle choices, can encourage managers and self-employed workers to prioritize preventive measures). These policy implications are essential for ensuring equitable and universal access to healthcare services for all workers, regardless of their employment status.</span></div></div>","PeriodicalId":48015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Policy Modeling","volume":"47 3","pages":"Pages 645-661"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Policy Modeling","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0161893824000590","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores whether and to which extent employment condition and working hours influence individuals’ decision process in consuming primary care. The hypothesis is that the higher the workers’ opportunity cost in terms of earning forgone, the less the demand for General Practitioner (GP) visits. Using survey data provided by the Italian National Institute of Statistics (ISTAT), we estimate a negative binomial regression model of GP visits as a function of employment related variables, controlling for a rich set of individual demographic characteristics, socio-economic variables, health status, supply and geographical factors. We show that self-employed workers, managers and cadres use significantly less primary care services notwithstanding the access is free. We conclude that they have higher opportunity costs than white and blue collars since they suffer more from the loss of earnings related to the absence from work. Self-employed individuals often face barriers to accessing healthcare services, such as lack of employer-sponsored health insurance and concerns about lost income during time off for medical appointments. As a result, they may delay seeking healthcare until their condition becomes more severe, leading to poorer health outcomes. Managers and cadres, on the other hand, may have greater access to healthcare services due to higher income levels and better job benefits. However, they may still face challenges such as long working hours and job-related stress, which can impact their ability to prioritize their health and seek timely medical care.
From a policy perspective, our results suggest potential policy interventions aimed at addressing barriers to healthcare access for self-employed workers and promoting equitable healthcare utilization across different employment groups. Policy recommendations may include measures to enhance financial support (tax deductions for medical expenses, subsidies for health insurance premiums, or grants to cover the costs of healthcare-related absences from work), increase healthcare accessibility (enhancing the availability of mobile clinics, and extending operating hours for primary care facilities to accommodate the needs of working individuals) and raise awareness about preventive care among self-employed workers (workplace wellness programs, and incentives for regular health check-ups, screenings and healthy lifestyle choices, can encourage managers and self-employed workers to prioritize preventive measures). These policy implications are essential for ensuring equitable and universal access to healthcare services for all workers, regardless of their employment status.
意大利的职业与医疗服务需求:减少病人机会成本的方法和途径
本文探讨了就业条件和工作时间是否以及在多大程度上影响个体的初级保健消费决策过程。假设工人放弃收入的机会成本越高,对全科医生(GP)就诊的需求越少。利用意大利国家统计局(ISTAT)提供的调查数据,我们估计了GP就诊的负二项回归模型,作为就业相关变量的函数,控制了丰富的个人人口特征、社会经济变量、健康状况、供应和地理因素。我们表明,尽管初级保健服务是免费的,但个体经营者、管理人员和干部使用的初级保健服务明显减少。我们的结论是,他们比白领和蓝领有更高的机会成本,因为他们更容易遭受与失业相关的收入损失。个体经营者往往在获得医疗保健服务方面面临障碍,例如缺乏雇主赞助的健康保险,以及担心因就医而休假期间收入损失。因此,他们可能会推迟寻求医疗保健,直到他们的病情变得更严重,导致更差的健康结果。另一方面,由于较高的收入水平和更好的工作福利,管理人员和干部可能有更多的机会获得保健服务。然而,他们可能仍然面临着诸如长时间工作和与工作相关的压力等挑战,这可能会影响他们优先考虑健康和及时寻求医疗护理的能力。从政策角度来看,我们的研究结果表明,潜在的政策干预措施旨在解决个体经营者获得医疗保健的障碍,并促进不同就业群体公平利用医疗保健。政策建议可包括以下措施:加强财政支持(医疗费用减税、健康保险费补贴或补助,以支付因医疗保健而缺勤的费用)、增加获得医疗保健的机会(增加流动诊所的可用性;延长初级保健设施的营业时间,以满足工作人员的需要),提高个体户工人对预防保健的认识(工作场所健康计划,鼓励定期健康检查、筛查和选择健康的生活方式,可以鼓励管理人员和个体户工人优先采取预防措施)。这些政策影响对于确保所有工人(无论其就业状况如何)公平和普遍获得医疗保健服务至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
11.40%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: The Journal of Policy Modeling is published by Elsevier for the Society for Policy Modeling to provide a forum for analysis and debate concerning international policy issues. The journal addresses questions of critical import to the world community as a whole, and it focuses upon the economic, social, and political interdependencies between national and regional systems. This implies concern with international policies for the promotion of a better life for all human beings and, therefore, concentrates on improved methodological underpinnings for dealing with these problems.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信