A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Single-Session Intervention to Reduce Training Psychologists’ Burnout

IF 3.4 2区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY
Briana S. Last , Laura K. Jans , Jessica L. Schleider
{"title":"A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of a Single-Session Intervention to Reduce Training Psychologists’ Burnout","authors":"Briana S. Last ,&nbsp;Laura K. Jans ,&nbsp;Jessica L. Schleider","doi":"10.1016/j.beth.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Professional psychology trainees often experience burnout during their clinical training. In a pilot randomized controlled trial, we tested the feasibility, acceptability, utility, and preliminary efficacy of a 10-minute, online single-session intervention (SSI), designed to address burnout, hopelessness, and perceived agency in psychology trainees. In March 2023, 151 doctoral students with symptoms of stress or burnout in accredited, U.S.-based professional psychology programs were randomized to either the SSI (<em>n</em> = 74) or an active control condition (<em>n</em> = 77). Immediately post-SSI, 98.5% of participants endorsed the SSI as likely helpful for their patients and 92.5% wanted more information on how to deliver it; at 2-week follow-up, 48.4% had used the SSI in their own life, and 16.1%, with a patient. On average, participants rated the SSI as <em>somewhat</em> helpful; feeling <em>somewhat</em> hopeful and <em>somewhat</em> motivated to use their SSI-driven action plan; and that they would <em>mostly</em> recommend the SSI to others. No significant cross-condition differences emerged in participants’ reported burnout, hopelessness, or perceived agency at post-intervention or at follow-up, though effect sizes for these primary outcomes were generally in expected directions (<em>d</em>s = 0.01–0.36). In response to secondary outcome measures, SSI participants (versus control participants) reported <em>perceiving</em> significantly larger immediate improvements in hopelessness (<em>d</em> = 0.87), their problem-solving ability (<em>d</em> = 0.85), and their ability to help patients solve problems (<em>d</em> = 0.71). Overall, findings were inconclusive regarding the SSI’s effects on overall burnout, hopelessness, and agency; however, the SSI appeared to support trainees’ interest in SSI delivery and real-world use, both with themselves and with their patients. Participant feedback provided helpful guidance to inform SSI refinement, and potential best-uses, before larger-scale evaluation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48359,"journal":{"name":"Behavior Therapy","volume":"56 1","pages":"Pages 162-176"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavior Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005789424000947","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Professional psychology trainees often experience burnout during their clinical training. In a pilot randomized controlled trial, we tested the feasibility, acceptability, utility, and preliminary efficacy of a 10-minute, online single-session intervention (SSI), designed to address burnout, hopelessness, and perceived agency in psychology trainees. In March 2023, 151 doctoral students with symptoms of stress or burnout in accredited, U.S.-based professional psychology programs were randomized to either the SSI (n = 74) or an active control condition (n = 77). Immediately post-SSI, 98.5% of participants endorsed the SSI as likely helpful for their patients and 92.5% wanted more information on how to deliver it; at 2-week follow-up, 48.4% had used the SSI in their own life, and 16.1%, with a patient. On average, participants rated the SSI as somewhat helpful; feeling somewhat hopeful and somewhat motivated to use their SSI-driven action plan; and that they would mostly recommend the SSI to others. No significant cross-condition differences emerged in participants’ reported burnout, hopelessness, or perceived agency at post-intervention or at follow-up, though effect sizes for these primary outcomes were generally in expected directions (ds = 0.01–0.36). In response to secondary outcome measures, SSI participants (versus control participants) reported perceiving significantly larger immediate improvements in hopelessness (d = 0.87), their problem-solving ability (d = 0.85), and their ability to help patients solve problems (d = 0.71). Overall, findings were inconclusive regarding the SSI’s effects on overall burnout, hopelessness, and agency; however, the SSI appeared to support trainees’ interest in SSI delivery and real-world use, both with themselves and with their patients. Participant feedback provided helpful guidance to inform SSI refinement, and potential best-uses, before larger-scale evaluation.
减少培训心理学家职业倦怠的单节课干预试点随机对照试验
专业心理学学员在临床培训中经常出现职业倦怠。在一项随机对照试验中,我们测试了10分钟在线单次干预(SSI)的可行性、可接受性、效用和初步效果,旨在解决心理学受训人员的倦怠、绝望和感知代理。在2023年3月,151名来自美国专业心理学专业的有压力或倦怠症状的博士生被随机分配到SSI组(n = 74)或积极对照组(n = 77)。在SSI之后,98.5%的参与者认为SSI可能对他们的病人有帮助,92.5%的参与者希望获得更多关于如何实施SSI的信息;在2周的随访中,48.4%的人在自己的生活中使用过SSI, 16.1%的人在患者身上使用过SSI。平均而言,参与者认为SSI有一定的帮助;感到有希望并有动力使用他们的ssid驱动的行动计划;他们通常会向其他人推荐SSI。在干预后或随访中,参与者报告的倦怠、绝望或感知代理没有显著的跨条件差异,尽管这些主要结果的效应量通常在预期的方向上(ds = 0.01-0.36)。在次要结果测量中,SSI参与者(与对照组相比)报告在绝望(d = 0.87)、解决问题的能力(d = 0.85)和帮助患者解决问题的能力(d = 0.71)方面有明显更大的即时改善。总体而言,关于SSI对整体倦怠、绝望和能动性的影响,研究结果尚无定论;然而,SSI似乎支持受训人员对SSI的传递和实际应用的兴趣,无论是对自己还是对患者。在大规模评估之前,参与者的反馈为SSI的改进和潜在的最佳用途提供了有益的指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Behavior Therapy
Behavior Therapy Multiple-
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
2.70%
发文量
113
审稿时长
121 days
期刊介绍: Behavior Therapy is a quarterly international journal devoted to the application of the behavioral and cognitive sciences to the conceptualization, assessment, and treatment of psychopathology and related clinical problems. It is intended for mental health professionals and students from all related disciplines who wish to remain current in these areas and provides a vehicle for scientist-practitioners and clinical scientists to report the results of their original empirical research. Although the major emphasis is placed upon empirical research, methodological and theoretical papers as well as evaluative reviews of the literature will also be published. Controlled single-case designs and clinical replication series are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信