Patient participation in orthopaedic care—a survey on hip surgery patients’ preferences for and experiences of engagement in their health and healthcare

IF 1.5 Q3 NURSING
Patricia Sköld , Maria Hälleberg-Nyman , Eva Joelsson-Alm , Ann Catrine Eldh
{"title":"Patient participation in orthopaedic care—a survey on hip surgery patients’ preferences for and experiences of engagement in their health and healthcare","authors":"Patricia Sköld ,&nbsp;Maria Hälleberg-Nyman ,&nbsp;Eva Joelsson-Alm ,&nbsp;Ann Catrine Eldh","doi":"10.1016/j.ijotn.2024.101118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Quality in health services is increasingly associated with enabling patients to participate in their own health and healthcare by recognising their resources and needs. Despite a growing recognition as to whether such participation is enabled, little is known regarding opportunities for preference-based patient participation in orthopaedic care.</p></div><div><h3>Aims</h3><p>To investigate preference-based participation for patients in orthopaedic care due to hip surgery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Patients across 17 Swedish orthopaedic units who had had hip surgery, due to hip fracture or osteoarthritis, January–April 2021 were invited to complete the validated 4Ps questionnaire. Of 1514 patients, 458 patients returned the questionnaire with reports on their preferences for and experiences of participation. Each of the 4Ps’ 12 items were analysed separately using descriptive and comparative statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A complete match in preferences for, and experiences of, participation was achieved with variation between items for 41%–50% of the patients; if almost matches were included, this occurred for 57%–77% of the patients. Less participation than preferred was most common in terms of having had reciprocal communication, opportunities for partaking in planning, and in learning how to manage symptoms/issues. Hip fracture surgery was significantly associated with experiencing lower levels of participation than preferred.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Though standardised care promotes efficient hip surgery care, our study suggests a need for more person-centred opportunities to engage. A discrepancy was noted between patients’ resources and preparation for their participation in and beyond the hip surgery process, particularly for self-care activities, calling for better use of nursing resources.</p></div><div><h3>Id</h3><p>NCT04700969 with the U.S National Institutes of Health Clinical Registry.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":45099,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","volume":"54 ","pages":"Article 101118"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124124000388/pdfft?md5=03bd720375a5c670eb49b5562014d782&pid=1-s2.0-S1878124124000388-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Orthopaedic and Trauma Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1878124124000388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Quality in health services is increasingly associated with enabling patients to participate in their own health and healthcare by recognising their resources and needs. Despite a growing recognition as to whether such participation is enabled, little is known regarding opportunities for preference-based patient participation in orthopaedic care.

Aims

To investigate preference-based participation for patients in orthopaedic care due to hip surgery.

Methods

Patients across 17 Swedish orthopaedic units who had had hip surgery, due to hip fracture or osteoarthritis, January–April 2021 were invited to complete the validated 4Ps questionnaire. Of 1514 patients, 458 patients returned the questionnaire with reports on their preferences for and experiences of participation. Each of the 4Ps’ 12 items were analysed separately using descriptive and comparative statistics.

Results

A complete match in preferences for, and experiences of, participation was achieved with variation between items for 41%–50% of the patients; if almost matches were included, this occurred for 57%–77% of the patients. Less participation than preferred was most common in terms of having had reciprocal communication, opportunities for partaking in planning, and in learning how to manage symptoms/issues. Hip fracture surgery was significantly associated with experiencing lower levels of participation than preferred.

Conclusion

Though standardised care promotes efficient hip surgery care, our study suggests a need for more person-centred opportunities to engage. A discrepancy was noted between patients’ resources and preparation for their participation in and beyond the hip surgery process, particularly for self-care activities, calling for better use of nursing resources.

Id

NCT04700969 with the U.S National Institutes of Health Clinical Registry.

患者参与骨科护理--关于髋关节手术患者参与其健康和医疗保健的偏好和经验的调查。
导言医疗服务的质量越来越多地与患者的资源和需求挂钩,使患者能够参与到自己的健康和医疗保健中来。方法 邀请 2021 年 1-4 月在瑞典 17 家骨科医院接受髋部手术(髋部骨折或骨关节炎)的患者填写经过验证的 4Ps 问卷。在 1514 名患者中,有 458 名患者返回了调查问卷,并报告了他们的参与偏好和参与体验。结果 41%-50%的患者的参与偏好和参与体验完全吻合,但各项目之间存在差异;如果包括几乎吻合的项目,则57%-77%的患者的参与偏好和参与体验完全吻合。最常见的情况是,患者的参与程度低于其希望参与的程度,如是否有机会进行对等交流、是否有机会参与规划以及是否有机会学习如何处理症状/问题。结论虽然标准化护理能提高髋关节手术护理的效率,但我们的研究表明需要更多以人为本的参与机会。我们注意到,患者在参与髋关节手术过程中及手术后的资源和准备情况之间存在差异,尤其是在自我护理活动方面,因此需要更好地利用护理资源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信