Developing linguistics educators: A qualitative study of graduate linguist professional development

IF 1.9 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Language Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1353/lan.2024.a929754
Allison Taylor-Adams, Kaylynn Gunter
{"title":"Developing linguistics educators: A qualitative study of graduate linguist professional development","authors":"Allison Taylor-Adams, Kaylynn Gunter","doi":"10.1353/lan.2024.a929754","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, we report on findings from an ongoing study of graduate students in linguistics regarding the approaches they take to develop as professional educators and how faculty and programs in linguistics can better support graduate student teaching professionalization. In focus groups with current linguistics graduate students, we identified three key themes: formal institutional training, mentor relationships (i.e. instructor and TA relationships), and peer relationships. Mentor relationships provide students with a range of experiences and degrees of support across faculty, which influences how they develop as educators. Peer socialization is also a critical component of growth and well-being, providing graduate student teachers with both practical guidance and ongoing emotional support. We illustrate this point with a case study—a weekly teaching journal club for graduate students within our own Linguistics program, which became an important space for pedagogical development. While our results point to graduate student success and resilience through socialization, they also illustrate a common issue of professionalization in academia: students gain professional skills through noninstitutional mechanisms. Teaching professionalization largely falls to the ‘hidden curriculum’, which puts students at a disadvantage, especially those from minoritized backgrounds (Smith 2013). We join other scholars in our field in calling for greater institutionalized mechanisms for professionalization to promote equitable access to vital skills for graduate students (Calhoun 2020). To that end, we conclude by suggesting ways in which faculty and departments can close this gap in graduate training.","PeriodicalId":17956,"journal":{"name":"Language","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/lan.2024.a929754","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:In this article, we report on findings from an ongoing study of graduate students in linguistics regarding the approaches they take to develop as professional educators and how faculty and programs in linguistics can better support graduate student teaching professionalization. In focus groups with current linguistics graduate students, we identified three key themes: formal institutional training, mentor relationships (i.e. instructor and TA relationships), and peer relationships. Mentor relationships provide students with a range of experiences and degrees of support across faculty, which influences how they develop as educators. Peer socialization is also a critical component of growth and well-being, providing graduate student teachers with both practical guidance and ongoing emotional support. We illustrate this point with a case study—a weekly teaching journal club for graduate students within our own Linguistics program, which became an important space for pedagogical development. While our results point to graduate student success and resilience through socialization, they also illustrate a common issue of professionalization in academia: students gain professional skills through noninstitutional mechanisms. Teaching professionalization largely falls to the ‘hidden curriculum’, which puts students at a disadvantage, especially those from minoritized backgrounds (Smith 2013). We join other scholars in our field in calling for greater institutionalized mechanisms for professionalization to promote equitable access to vital skills for graduate students (Calhoun 2020). To that end, we conclude by suggesting ways in which faculty and departments can close this gap in graduate training.
培养语言学教育工作者:语言学研究生专业发展的定性研究
摘要:在这篇文章中,我们报告了对语言学专业研究生正在进行的一项研究的结果,该研究涉及他们作为专业教育工作者所采取的方法,以及语言学专业的教师和课程如何更好地支持研究生教学专业化。在与在读语言学研究生进行的焦点小组讨论中,我们发现了三个关键主题:正规机构培训、导师关系(即导师与助教关系)以及同行关系。导师关系为学生提供了各种经验和不同程度的支持,从而影响了他们作为教育者的发展。同伴社交也是成长和幸福的重要组成部分,它为研究生教师提供了实际指导和持续的情感支持。我们通过一个案例研究来说明这一点--在我们自己的语言学项目中,研究生每周一次的教学期刊俱乐部成为了教学发展的一个重要空间。我们的研究结果表明,研究生通过社会化获得了成功和适应力,同时也说明了学术界专业化的一个普遍问题:学生通过非机构机制获得专业技能。教学专业化在很大程度上属于 "隐性课程",这使学生处于不利地位,尤其是那些来自少数民族背景的学生(Smith,2013 年)。我们和本领域的其他学者一样,呼吁建立更多的职业化制度化机制,以促进研究生公平地获得重要技能(Calhoun 2020)。为此,我们最后提出了院系缩小研究生培养差距的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Language
Language Multiple-
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
48
期刊介绍: Language, the official journal for the Linguistic Society of America, is published quarterly and contains articles, short reports, book reviews and book notices on all aspects of linguistics, focussing on the area of theoretical linguistics. Edited by Greg Carlson, Language serves a readership of over 5,000 and has been the primary literary vehicle for the Society since 1924.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信