Living Alone With Mild-to-Moderate Dementia Over a Two-Year Period: Longitudinal Findings From the IDEAL Cohort

IF 4.4 2区 医学 Q1 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
{"title":"Living Alone With Mild-to-Moderate Dementia Over a Two-Year Period: Longitudinal Findings From the IDEAL Cohort","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.jagp.2024.05.012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>To compare the experiences of people with dementia living alone or with others and how these may change over two years.</div></div><div><h3>Design</h3><div>We analysed longitudinal data from three assessment waves, one year apart, in the British IDEAL cohort.</div></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><div>Participants with mild-to-moderate dementia were recruited through National Health Service providers, where possible with a family caregiver, and interviewed at home.</div></div><div><h3>Participants</h3><div>The current analyses include 281 people with dementia living alone and 1,244 living with others at baseline; follow-up data were available for 200 and 965 respectively at time 2 and 144 and 696 respectively at time 3. For those living alone, 140 nonresident caregivers contributed at baseline, 102 at time 2 and 81 at time 3. For those living with others, 1,127 family caregivers contributed at baseline, 876 at time 2 and 670 at time 3.</div></div><div><h3>Measurements</h3><div>Assessments covered: cognitive and functional ability; self-reported perceptions of health, mood, social engagement, quality of life, satisfaction with life and well-being; use of in-home and community care; and transitions into residential care.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>People living alone tended to have better cognitive and functional ability and were more frequent users of in-home care. However, they experienced poorer physical, social, and psychological health and reduced quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being. These differences persisted over time and rates of transition into residential care were higher.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>To facilitate continuing in place for people with dementia living alone, a dual focus on supporting functional ability and add ressing psychosocial needs is essential in the context of an enabling policy framework.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":55534,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","volume":"32 11","pages":"Pages 1309-1321"},"PeriodicalIF":4.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S106474812400352X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives

To compare the experiences of people with dementia living alone or with others and how these may change over two years.

Design

We analysed longitudinal data from three assessment waves, one year apart, in the British IDEAL cohort.

Setting

Participants with mild-to-moderate dementia were recruited through National Health Service providers, where possible with a family caregiver, and interviewed at home.

Participants

The current analyses include 281 people with dementia living alone and 1,244 living with others at baseline; follow-up data were available for 200 and 965 respectively at time 2 and 144 and 696 respectively at time 3. For those living alone, 140 nonresident caregivers contributed at baseline, 102 at time 2 and 81 at time 3. For those living with others, 1,127 family caregivers contributed at baseline, 876 at time 2 and 670 at time 3.

Measurements

Assessments covered: cognitive and functional ability; self-reported perceptions of health, mood, social engagement, quality of life, satisfaction with life and well-being; use of in-home and community care; and transitions into residential care.

Results

People living alone tended to have better cognitive and functional ability and were more frequent users of in-home care. However, they experienced poorer physical, social, and psychological health and reduced quality of life, satisfaction with life, and well-being. These differences persisted over time and rates of transition into residential care were higher.

Conclusions

To facilitate continuing in place for people with dementia living alone, a dual focus on supporting functional ability and add ressing psychosocial needs is essential in the context of an enabling policy framework.
轻度至中度痴呆症患者独居两年:IDEAL 队列的纵向研究结果
目标比较痴呆症患者独自生活或与他人共同生活的经历,以及这些经历在两年内可能发生的变化。设计我们分析了英国 IDEAL 队列中相隔一年的三次评估波的纵向数据。参与者目前的分析包括基线时独居的 281 名痴呆患者和与他人同住的 1244 名痴呆患者;分别有 200 人和 965 人在第 2 次和 144 人和 696 人在第 3 次获得了随访数据。对于独居痴呆症患者,140 名非居住地照护者在基线时提供了数据,102 名在第二时间提供了数据,81 名在第三时间提供了数据。评估内容包括:认知和功能能力;对健康、情绪、社会参与、生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感的自我报告;居家和社区护理的使用情况;以及向住宿护理的过渡情况。结果独居者的认知和功能能力往往更好,也更经常使用居家护理。但是,他们的身体、社交和心理健康状况较差,生活质量、生活满意度和幸福感也较低。这些差异会随着时间的推移而持续存在,而且过渡到寄宿护理的比例也更高。结论要促进独居痴呆症患者的居家养老,在有利的政策框架下,必须同时关注支持功能能力和满足社会心理需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.00
自引率
4.20%
发文量
381
审稿时长
26 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry is the leading source of information in the rapidly evolving field of geriatric psychiatry. This esteemed journal features peer-reviewed articles covering topics such as the diagnosis and classification of psychiatric disorders in older adults, epidemiological and biological correlates of mental health in the elderly, and psychopharmacology and other somatic treatments. Published twelve times a year, the journal serves as an authoritative resource for professionals in the field.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信