Estimating a cost-effectiveness threshold for healthcare decision-making in the Greek NHS

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES
{"title":"Estimating a cost-effectiveness threshold for healthcare decision-making in the Greek NHS","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.hlpt.2024.100882","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The introduction of new health technologies improves quality of life and longevity, but also imposes additional strains in the scarce resources of the health system. Consequently, decisions on the adoption of new technologies are typically based, among other criteria, on the difference between costs and outcomes among competing alternatives. This paper aims to estimate a cost-effectiveness threshold that can be used as an input in the decision-making process for the funding (or reimbursement) of health technologies in Greece.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>For a 30-year period, we calculate the Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy (QALE) of the Greek population and regress it against per capita public health expenditure, using an instrumental variable approach and controlling for a set of covariates. The estimated coefficients of expenditure on QALE are used to inform a cost-effectiveness threshold, estimatead as the cost per QALY gained through a permanent increase in per capita spending.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Based on the estimated coefficient of health expenditure, we estimate a base case cost-effectiveness threshold of €27,117 per QALY gained for the Greek healthcare system, from a third-party payer perspective.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>In the Greek healthcare system, which is currently in the stage of establishing a comprehensive health technology assessment process, decision rules which are not based on heuristics or “rules of thumb”, are essential.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48672,"journal":{"name":"Health Policy and Technology","volume":"13 3","pages":"Article 100882"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Policy and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2211883724000455","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The introduction of new health technologies improves quality of life and longevity, but also imposes additional strains in the scarce resources of the health system. Consequently, decisions on the adoption of new technologies are typically based, among other criteria, on the difference between costs and outcomes among competing alternatives. This paper aims to estimate a cost-effectiveness threshold that can be used as an input in the decision-making process for the funding (or reimbursement) of health technologies in Greece.

Methods

For a 30-year period, we calculate the Quality-Adjusted Life Expectancy (QALE) of the Greek population and regress it against per capita public health expenditure, using an instrumental variable approach and controlling for a set of covariates. The estimated coefficients of expenditure on QALE are used to inform a cost-effectiveness threshold, estimatead as the cost per QALY gained through a permanent increase in per capita spending.

Results

Based on the estimated coefficient of health expenditure, we estimate a base case cost-effectiveness threshold of €27,117 per QALY gained for the Greek healthcare system, from a third-party payer perspective.

Conclusions

In the Greek healthcare system, which is currently in the stage of establishing a comprehensive health technology assessment process, decision rules which are not based on heuristics or “rules of thumb”, are essential.

估算希腊国家医疗服务体系医疗决策的成本效益阈值
背景新医疗技术的引入提高了生活质量和寿命,但也给医疗系统稀缺的资源带来了额外的压力。因此,在决定是否采用新技术时,除其他标准外,通常还需考虑竞争替代方案的成本与效果之间的差异。本文旨在估算一个成本效益阈值,该阈值可作为希腊医疗技术资助(或报销)决策过程中的一项投入。方法在 30 年的时间里,我们计算了希腊人口的质量调整后预期寿命(QALE),并利用工具变量法将其与人均公共医疗支出进行回归,同时控制一组协变量。结果基于医疗支出的估计系数,我们从第三方支付者的角度估计出希腊医疗保健系统的基础成本效益阈值为每 QALY 27,117 欧元。结论希腊医疗保健系统目前正处于建立全面医疗技术评估流程的阶段,因此必须制定不以启发式或 "经验法则 "为基础的决策规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Health Policy and Technology
Health Policy and Technology Medicine-Health Policy
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
3.30%
发文量
78
审稿时长
88 days
期刊介绍: Health Policy and Technology (HPT), is the official journal of the Fellowship of Postgraduate Medicine (FPM), a cross-disciplinary journal, which focuses on past, present and future health policy and the role of technology in clinical and non-clinical national and international health environments. HPT provides a further excellent way for the FPM to continue to make important national and international contributions to development of policy and practice within medicine and related disciplines. The aim of HPT is to publish relevant, timely and accessible articles and commentaries to support policy-makers, health professionals, health technology providers, patient groups and academia interested in health policy and technology. Topics covered by HPT will include: - Health technology, including drug discovery, diagnostics, medicines, devices, therapeutic delivery and eHealth systems - Cross-national comparisons on health policy using evidence-based approaches - National studies on health policy to determine the outcomes of technology-driven initiatives - Cross-border eHealth including health tourism - The digital divide in mobility, access and affordability of healthcare - Health technology assessment (HTA) methods and tools for evaluating the effectiveness of clinical and non-clinical health technologies - Health and eHealth indicators and benchmarks (measure/metrics) for understanding the adoption and diffusion of health technologies - Health and eHealth models and frameworks to support policy-makers and other stakeholders in decision-making - Stakeholder engagement with health technologies (clinical and patient/citizen buy-in) - Regulation and health economics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信