Tools to reduce inappropriate drug use in geriatric patients: PRISCUS 2.0 list updates

Şeyma Handan Akyön , Kamile Sılay , Petra A. Thürmann
{"title":"Tools to reduce inappropriate drug use in geriatric patients: PRISCUS 2.0 list updates","authors":"Şeyma Handan Akyön ,&nbsp;Kamile Sılay ,&nbsp;Petra A. Thürmann","doi":"10.1016/j.aggp.2024.100052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medications, poses significant risks to geriatric patients due to increased susceptibility to side effects and interactions. This narrative review addresses the challenges posed by polypharmacy in older adults, emphasizing the importance of reducing adverse effects. The article examines explicit, implicit, and mixed assessment tools used to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and minimize adverse effects in geriatric populations.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>The article underscores the critical need for accurate assessment and intervention to mitigate the negative consequences of polypharmacy in geriatric patients. The PRISCUS 2.0 List, an extensively updated version of the original PRISCUS list, emerges as a comprehensive tool to aid healthcare professionals in identifying PIMs. Its expanded medication list, incorporation of new evaluation criteria, disease-specific considerations, and enhanced classification system contribute to better identification of inappropriate medications. When we compared with other PIM criteria in previous studies, the EU(7)-PIM list was one of the most comprehensive, and with the PRISCUS 2.0 list update, it was determined that it contains partially more drugs that are inappropriate for the elderly in the Turkish pharmaceutical market. Comparisons between various criteria reveal their varying detection rates and strengths, highlighting the significance of using multiple criteria for a more holistic assessment. Additionally, the advent of online applications offers accessible solutions by consolidating multiple explicit criteria into a single platform, aiding practitioners in making well-informed decisions. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing updates, validation, and suitability assessments for these tools in diverse healthcare settings to ensure their effectiveness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100119,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","volume":"1 4","pages":"Article 100052"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000493/pdfft?md5=852d9e280818336d66957d25c461faa8&pid=1-s2.0-S2950307824000493-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Gerontology and Geriatrics Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2950307824000493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Polypharmacy, the concurrent use of multiple medications, poses significant risks to geriatric patients due to increased susceptibility to side effects and interactions. This narrative review addresses the challenges posed by polypharmacy in older adults, emphasizing the importance of reducing adverse effects. The article examines explicit, implicit, and mixed assessment tools used to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and minimize adverse effects in geriatric populations.

Conclusion

The article underscores the critical need for accurate assessment and intervention to mitigate the negative consequences of polypharmacy in geriatric patients. The PRISCUS 2.0 List, an extensively updated version of the original PRISCUS list, emerges as a comprehensive tool to aid healthcare professionals in identifying PIMs. Its expanded medication list, incorporation of new evaluation criteria, disease-specific considerations, and enhanced classification system contribute to better identification of inappropriate medications. When we compared with other PIM criteria in previous studies, the EU(7)-PIM list was one of the most comprehensive, and with the PRISCUS 2.0 list update, it was determined that it contains partially more drugs that are inappropriate for the elderly in the Turkish pharmaceutical market. Comparisons between various criteria reveal their varying detection rates and strengths, highlighting the significance of using multiple criteria for a more holistic assessment. Additionally, the advent of online applications offers accessible solutions by consolidating multiple explicit criteria into a single platform, aiding practitioners in making well-informed decisions. The study emphasizes the need for ongoing updates, validation, and suitability assessments for these tools in diverse healthcare settings to ensure their effectiveness.

减少老年病人不当用药的工具:priscus 2.0 列表更新
导言多重用药,即同时使用多种药物,由于副作用和相互作用的易感性增加,给老年患者带来了极大的风险。这篇叙述性综述探讨了多种药物给老年人带来的挑战,强调了减少不良反应的重要性。文章探讨了显性、隐性和混合评估工具,这些工具可用于识别潜在的不适当用药(PIMs)并最大限度地减少老年群体的不良反应。结论本文强调了准确评估和干预的重要性,以减轻老年患者使用多种药物的不良后果。PRISCUS 2.0 清单是原始 PRISCUS 清单的全面更新版,是帮助医护人员识别 PIMs 的综合工具。它扩充了药物清单,纳入了新的评估标准、特定疾病考虑因素和增强的分类系统,有助于更好地识别不适当的药物。与以往研究中的其他 PIM 标准相比,EU(7)-PIM 清单是最全面的清单之一,而随着 PRISCUS 2.0 清单的更新,我们发现该清单包含了土耳其医药市场中部分更多不适合老年人的药物。对各种标准进行比较后发现,它们的检出率和优势各不相同,这突出表明了使用多种标准进行更全面评估的重要性。此外,在线应用程序的出现通过将多个明确的标准整合到一个平台上,提供了便捷的解决方案,有助于从业人员在充分知情的情况下做出决策。这项研究强调了在不同的医疗环境中对这些工具进行持续更新、验证和适用性评估以确保其有效性的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信