The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their association with clinical outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 9.6 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Yaowen Zhang , Junru Chen , Haoyang Liu , Jindong Dai , Junjie Zhao , Sha Zhu , Xingming Zhang , Jiayu Liang , Xu Hu , Jinge Zhao , Zhenhua Liu , Pengfei Shen , Guangxi Sun , Hao Zeng
{"title":"The incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and their association with clinical outcomes in advanced renal cell carcinoma and urothelial carcinoma patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Yaowen Zhang ,&nbsp;Junru Chen ,&nbsp;Haoyang Liu ,&nbsp;Jindong Dai ,&nbsp;Junjie Zhao ,&nbsp;Sha Zhu ,&nbsp;Xingming Zhang ,&nbsp;Jiayu Liang ,&nbsp;Xu Hu ,&nbsp;Jinge Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhenhua Liu ,&nbsp;Pengfei Shen ,&nbsp;Guangxi Sun ,&nbsp;Hao Zeng","doi":"10.1016/j.ctrv.2024.102787","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>This study aimed to summarize the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and further evaluate their association with clinical outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2023 was conducted to identify eligible studies. The details of irAEs and data regarding their correlation with clinical outcomes were extracted. R software was used for <em>meta</em>-analysis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 27 studies involving 6148 patients with RCC or UC were included. The pooled overall incidence for any-grade and grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 44.2 % (95 % CI: 38.1 %-50.5 %) and 15.7 % (95 % CI: 11.4 %-21.1 %), respectively. Compared to those without any irAEs, patients with irAEs showed improved PFS (HR = 0.44, 95 % CI: 0.35–0.56, p &lt; 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.42–0.51, p &lt; 0.01), as well as higher ORR (OR = 3.59, 95 % CI: 3.01–4.29, p &lt; 0.01) and DCR (OR = 4.23, 95 % CI: 3.06–5.84, p &lt; 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that clinical outcome improvements were associated with the occurrence of irAEs, regardless of tumor type or ICI agent. Notably, patients with cutaneous irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, and grade ≤ 2 irAEs had a higher probability to achieve better survival benefits from ICI-based therapy, while pulmonary irAEs and grade ≥ 3 irAEs seemed to have a negative impact on OS. Additionally, systemic glucocorticoids administration did not affect survival outcomes.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Our findings suggest that the occurrence of irAEs could be considered as a potential prognostic factor for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced RCC and UC.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":9537,"journal":{"name":"Cancer treatment reviews","volume":"129 ","pages":"Article 102787"},"PeriodicalIF":9.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer treatment reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305737224001154","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

This study aimed to summarize the occurrence of immune-related adverse events (irAEs) and further evaluate their association with clinical outcomes in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and urothelial carcinoma (UC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).

Methods

A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library up to December 2023 was conducted to identify eligible studies. The details of irAEs and data regarding their correlation with clinical outcomes were extracted. R software was used for meta-analysis.

Results

A total of 27 studies involving 6148 patients with RCC or UC were included. The pooled overall incidence for any-grade and grade ≥ 3 irAEs was 44.2 % (95 % CI: 38.1 %-50.5 %) and 15.7 % (95 % CI: 11.4 %-21.1 %), respectively. Compared to those without any irAEs, patients with irAEs showed improved PFS (HR = 0.44, 95 % CI: 0.35–0.56, p < 0.01) and OS (HR = 0.47, 95 % CI: 0.42–0.51, p < 0.01), as well as higher ORR (OR = 3.59, 95 % CI: 3.01–4.29, p < 0.01) and DCR (OR = 4.23, 95 % CI: 3.06–5.84, p < 0.01). Subgroup analysis indicated that clinical outcome improvements were associated with the occurrence of irAEs, regardless of tumor type or ICI agent. Notably, patients with cutaneous irAEs, thyroid dysfunction, and grade ≤ 2 irAEs had a higher probability to achieve better survival benefits from ICI-based therapy, while pulmonary irAEs and grade ≥ 3 irAEs seemed to have a negative impact on OS. Additionally, systemic glucocorticoids administration did not affect survival outcomes.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that the occurrence of irAEs could be considered as a potential prognostic factor for predicting the efficacy of ICIs in patients with advanced RCC and UC.

接受免疫检查点抑制剂治疗的晚期肾细胞癌和尿路上皮癌患者的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)发生率及其与临床结果的关系:系统综述与荟萃分析
背景本研究旨在总结接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)治疗的晚期肾细胞癌(RCC)和尿路上皮癌(UC)患者的免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)的发生情况,并进一步评估其与临床结局的关系。方法对截至2023年12月的PubMed、Embase和Cochrane图书馆进行了全面检索,以确定符合条件的研究。提取了irAEs的详细信息及其与临床结果的相关数据。结果 共纳入27项研究,涉及6148名RCC或UC患者。任何等级和等级≥3的虹膜AE总发生率分别为44.2%(95% CI:38.1%-50.5%)和15.7%(95% CI:11.4%-21.1%)。与没有任何irAEs的患者相比,有irAEs的患者的PFS(HR = 0.44,95 % CI: 0.35-0.56, p <0.01)和OS(HR = 0.47,95 % CI: 0.42-0.51, p <0.01),以及更高的 ORR(OR = 3.59, 95 % CI: 3.01-4.29, p <0.01)和 DCR(OR = 4.23, 95 % CI: 3.06-5.84, p <0.01)。亚组分析表明,无论肿瘤类型或 ICI 药物如何,临床结果的改善都与虹膜睫状体异常的发生有关。值得注意的是,有皮肤虹膜睫状体异常、甲状腺功能障碍和≤2级虹膜睫状体异常的患者更有可能从基于ICI的治疗中获得更好的生存获益,而肺虹膜睫状体异常和≥3级虹膜睫状体异常似乎对OS有负面影响。结论我们的研究结果表明,在晚期RCC和UC患者中,irAEs的发生可被视为预测ICIs疗效的潜在预后因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Cancer treatment reviews
Cancer treatment reviews 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
21.40
自引率
0.80%
发文量
109
审稿时长
13 days
期刊介绍: Cancer Treatment Reviews Journal Overview: International journal focused on developments in cancer treatment research Publishes state-of-the-art, authoritative reviews to keep clinicians and researchers informed Regular Sections in Each Issue: Comments on Controversy Tumor Reviews Anti-tumor Treatments New Drugs Complications of Treatment General and Supportive Care Laboratory/Clinic Interface Submission and Editorial System: Online submission and editorial system for Cancer Treatment Reviews
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信