Impact of demographic and clinical factors on elagolix plus add-back therapy effects on patient-reported nonbleeding symptoms in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids: a post hoc analysis of data from two clinical trials
{"title":"Impact of demographic and clinical factors on elagolix plus add-back therapy effects on patient-reported nonbleeding symptoms in women with heavy menstrual bleeding and uterine fibroids: a post hoc analysis of data from two clinical trials","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.xfre.2024.06.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>To investigate the efficacy of elagolix plus add-back therapy (estradiol [1 mg] and norethindrone acetate [0.5 mg] once daily) on patient-reported nonbleeding symptoms and menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids (UFs) across different subpopulations.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials—Elaris UF-1 and UF-2.</p></div><div><h3>Setting</h3><p>A total of 76 (UF-1) and 77 (UF-2) US clinical sites.</p></div><div><h3>Patient(s)</h3><p>Women (N = 591) with UFs and heavy menstrual bleeding.</p></div><div><h3>Intervention(s)</h3><p>Elagolix (300 mg) twice daily with add-back therapy (the indicated dose for UF-associated heavy menstrual bleeding) vs. placebo for 6 months.</p></div><div><h3>Main Outcome Measure(s)</h3><p>“Very much improved” or “much improved” change in nonbleeding symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, abdominal/pelvic pressure/cramping, back pain, and abdominal bloating) and menstrual bleeding measured using a Patient Global Impression of Change scale. Improvements were assessed in subpopulations stratified using baseline characteristics (age, race [self-reported], body mass index, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics fibroid classification).</p></div><div><h3>Result(s)</h3><p>Across subpopulations, differences favored elagolix plus add-back therapy (vs. placebo) for most symptoms at month 1 and all symptoms at months 3 as well as 6. In patients with characteristics commonly associated with high disease burden (age >40 years, Black/African American), those treated with elagolix plus add-back therapy reported significantly greater improvements vs. placebo at months 1–6 (<em>P</em><.05) for all nonbleeding and bleeding symptoms (<em>P</em>≤.05).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion(s)</h3><p>Premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and UFs receiving elagolix plus add-back therapy experienced significant improvements in nonbleeding as well as bleeding symptoms from months 1–6, regardless of baseline characteristics.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical Trial Registration Number</h3><p>NCT02654054 and NCT02691494.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34409,"journal":{"name":"FS Reports","volume":"5 3","pages":"Pages 285-295"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000734/pdfft?md5=cc38af74c44775138d3bc776b91f6de5&pid=1-s2.0-S2666334124000734-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"FS Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666334124000734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To investigate the efficacy of elagolix plus add-back therapy (estradiol [1 mg] and norethindrone acetate [0.5 mg] once daily) on patient-reported nonbleeding symptoms and menstrual bleeding associated with uterine fibroids (UFs) across different subpopulations.
Design
Post hoc analysis of two phase 3 clinical trials—Elaris UF-1 and UF-2.
Setting
A total of 76 (UF-1) and 77 (UF-2) US clinical sites.
Patient(s)
Women (N = 591) with UFs and heavy menstrual bleeding.
Intervention(s)
Elagolix (300 mg) twice daily with add-back therapy (the indicated dose for UF-associated heavy menstrual bleeding) vs. placebo for 6 months.
Main Outcome Measure(s)
“Very much improved” or “much improved” change in nonbleeding symptoms (abdominal/pelvic pain, abdominal/pelvic pressure/cramping, back pain, and abdominal bloating) and menstrual bleeding measured using a Patient Global Impression of Change scale. Improvements were assessed in subpopulations stratified using baseline characteristics (age, race [self-reported], body mass index, and International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics fibroid classification).
Result(s)
Across subpopulations, differences favored elagolix plus add-back therapy (vs. placebo) for most symptoms at month 1 and all symptoms at months 3 as well as 6. In patients with characteristics commonly associated with high disease burden (age >40 years, Black/African American), those treated with elagolix plus add-back therapy reported significantly greater improvements vs. placebo at months 1–6 (P<.05) for all nonbleeding and bleeding symptoms (P≤.05).
Conclusion(s)
Premenopausal women with heavy menstrual bleeding and UFs receiving elagolix plus add-back therapy experienced significant improvements in nonbleeding as well as bleeding symptoms from months 1–6, regardless of baseline characteristics.