Risk factors for enhanced recovery after surgery failure in patients undergoing lung cancer resection with concomitant cardiovascular disease: A single-center retrospective study
Lili Sun , Yutong Lu , Yanfang Zhang , Chan Jin , Zhenwei Yuan , Renhua Xu
{"title":"Risk factors for enhanced recovery after surgery failure in patients undergoing lung cancer resection with concomitant cardiovascular disease: A single-center retrospective study","authors":"Lili Sun , Yutong Lu , Yanfang Zhang , Chan Jin , Zhenwei Yuan , Renhua Xu","doi":"10.1016/j.apjon.2024.100532","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in patients with lung cancer, and its effectiveness has been confirmed; however, some lung cancers with poor clinical outcomes lead to ERAS failure after radical resection. This study aimed to analyze risk factors associated with ERAS failure after radical resection in patients with lung cancer and concomitant cardiovascular disease.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>In total, 198 patients who underwent ERAS following radical lung cancer surgery for concomitant cardiovascular disease between January 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the definition of ERAS failure: ERAS success group (<em>n</em> = 152) and ERAS failure group (<em>n</em> = 46). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of ERAS failure.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Univariate analysis showed that gender, tumor location, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), suction drainage, and total cholesterol were associated with ERAS failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.015; <em>P</em> = 0.011) and suction drainage (OR = 3.343; <em>P</em> = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ERAS failure.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Operation time and suction drainage were independent risk factors for ERAS failure after radical resection of combined cardiovascular lung cancer. Therefore, improving surgical efficiency and postoperative chest drain management are important for successful ERAS.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001549/pdfft?md5=063fbfa261452ed9b0f2f314a6e1119a&pid=1-s2.0-S2347562524001549-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2347562524001549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has been widely used in patients with lung cancer, and its effectiveness has been confirmed; however, some lung cancers with poor clinical outcomes lead to ERAS failure after radical resection. This study aimed to analyze risk factors associated with ERAS failure after radical resection in patients with lung cancer and concomitant cardiovascular disease.
Methods
In total, 198 patients who underwent ERAS following radical lung cancer surgery for concomitant cardiovascular disease between January 2022 and September 2023 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the definition of ERAS failure: ERAS success group (n = 152) and ERAS failure group (n = 46). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to investigate the risk factors of ERAS failure.
Results
Univariate analysis showed that gender, tumor location, operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), suction drainage, and total cholesterol were associated with ERAS failure. Multivariate analysis showed that operation time (odds ratio [OR] = 1.015; P = 0.011) and suction drainage (OR = 3.343; P = 0.008) were independent risk factors for ERAS failure.
Conclusions
Operation time and suction drainage were independent risk factors for ERAS failure after radical resection of combined cardiovascular lung cancer. Therefore, improving surgical efficiency and postoperative chest drain management are important for successful ERAS.